2025-2026 Season — Page 685 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34201 | JTown Juniors 15-Black | 1375 | 11-21 | 34% | 15 | AR |
| 34202 | Sun City Raptors Rise 14 | 1375 | 13-14 | 46% | 14 | TX |
| 34203 | OT 11-O shaniah | 1374 | 6-13 | 32% | 11 | FL |
| 34204 | Wolfpack 15-Elite black | 1374 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | MA |
| 34205 | FVBC 15-Regional black | 1374 | 13-23 | 33% | 15 | MD |
| 34206 | 315VB 16-1 | 1374 | 5-7 | 42% | 16 | NY |
| 34207 | BRAVO 12-White | 1374 | 9-11 | 45% | 12 | KY |
| 34208 | Goldfish 18-Teal | 1374 | 13-24 | 35% | 18 | CO |
| 34209 | Faribault Red 17-1 | 1374 | 0-4 | 0% | 17 | MN |
| 34210 | Kodiak 14-Black | 1374 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | WA |
| 34211 | ROX 18 | 1374 | 14-16 | 47% | 18 | NC |
| 34212 | Philly Starlings 15-1 | 1374 | 1-4 | 11% | 15 | PA |
| 34213 | LAVA West 15-Premier sj | 1374 | 23-29 | 44% | 15 | CA |
| 34214 | Adira 16-Saunders | 1374 | 11-18 | 32% | 16 | TN |
| 34215 | Send Me 14-2b ricardo | 1374 | 2-7 | 22% | 14 | AL |
| 34216 | SHVBC 12-2 green | 1374 | 6-9 | 40% | 12 | OR |
| 34217 | Next 12-Blue | 1374 | 7-12 | 37% | 12 | OH |
| 34218 | Gators 17-Black | 1374 | 17-40 | 30% | 17 | MA |
| 34219 | CAVE 17 Gold | 1374 | 12-18 | 40% | 17 | PA |
| 34220 | Southland 10-Red | 1374 | 6-11 | 32% | 10 | LA |
| 34221 | Elevate Academy 14 EAVC Gray | 1374 | 6-14 | 30% | 14 | NC |
| 34222 | Nox 18-Solar | 1374 | 8-9 | 44% | 18 | PA |
| 34223 | Top Flight 15-Rho | 1374 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | IL |
| 34224 | IPV 15 Royal | 1374 | 24-19 | 56% | 15 | IL |
| 34225 | MN Premier 14-1 | 1374 | 14-16 | 47% | 14 | MN |
| 34226 | WPA 17-Zacherl | 1374 | 3-9 | 25% | 17 | PA |
| 34227 | Northern Impact 14-Ub | 1374 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | MN |
| 34228 | Air Capital Aces 17-1 | 1374 | 0-4 | 0% | 17 | KS |
| 34229 | ABV Flash 14-S - katie | 1374 | 8-15 | 35% | 14 | CA |
| 34230 | Apex 10 Predators | 1374 | 5-10 | 29% | 10 | IL |
| 34231 | Miami Bombers 18-Gabriela | 1374 | 16-14 | 53% | 18 | FL |
| 34232 | Mindset Regional 18 | 1374 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | IL |
| 34233 | United 12-Blue | 1374 | 10-17 | 37% | 12 | AL |
| 34234 | SWVA Elite 15-Kaylee | 1374 | 10-16 | 38% | 15 | VA |
| 34235 | Mission 12-Green | 1374 | 2-9 | 18% | 12 | IL |
| 34236 | CJ Heat 16-Black 2 | 1374 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | NJ |
| 34237 | SNVF 15 ECLIPSE | 1374 | 22-43 | 34% | 15 | WA |
| 34238 | Cloud 17-Phet/chalee | 1374 | 0-6 | 0% | 17 | NV |
| 34239 | Princeton JO 15-2 | 1374 | 6-13 | 32% | 15 | MN |
| 34240 | GHVBC 15-1 | 1374 | 0-4 | 0% | 15 | MN |
| 34241 | Hunters Creek Volleyball Academy 16 16 Windermere | 1374 | 10-13 | 43% | 16 | FL |
| 34242 | OCVC 10-Taylor | 1374 | 14-23 | 37% | 10 | WY |
| 34243 | Southern Focus Volleyball Club 17 Extreme Focus | 1374 | 9-16 | 36% | 17 | |
| 34244 | OYA 16-6-7 | 1374 | 1-5 | 17% | 16 | CA |
| 34245 | Left Coast 12-Blue | 1374 | 12-15 | 44% | 12 | CA |
| 34246 | Thunder 15-1 | 1374 | 13-21 | 34% | 15 | AL |
| 34247 | New Heights Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1374 | 5-8 | 38% | 15 | WY |
| 34248 | Squad 12-Premier | 1374 | 6-13 | 32% | 12 | NV |
| 34249 | NEVA 14-Blue maliyah | 1374 | 9-12 | 32% | 14 | UT |
| 34250 | Mintonette Sports 13-3 | 1374 | 17-38 | 31% | 13 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.