Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 685 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34201 JTown Juniors 15-Black 1375 11-21 34% 15 AR
34202 Sun City Raptors Rise 14 1375 13-14 46% 14 TX
34203 OT 11-O shaniah 1374 6-13 32% 11 FL
34204 Wolfpack 15-Elite black 1374 0-3 0% 15 MA
34205 FVBC 15-Regional black 1374 13-23 33% 15 MD
34206 315VB 16-1 1374 5-7 42% 16 NY
34207 BRAVO 12-White 1374 9-11 45% 12 KY
34208 Goldfish 18-Teal 1374 13-24 35% 18 CO
34209 Faribault Red 17-1 1374 0-4 0% 17 MN
34210 Kodiak 14-Black 1374 0-3 0% 14 WA
34211 ROX 18 1374 14-16 47% 18 NC
34212 Philly Starlings 15-1 1374 1-4 11% 15 PA
34213 LAVA West 15-Premier sj 1374 23-29 44% 15 CA
34214 Adira 16-Saunders 1374 11-18 32% 16 TN
34215 Send Me 14-2b ricardo 1374 2-7 22% 14 AL
34216 SHVBC 12-2 green 1374 6-9 40% 12 OR
34217 Next 12-Blue 1374 7-12 37% 12 OH
34218 Gators 17-Black 1374 17-40 30% 17 MA
34219 CAVE 17 Gold 1374 12-18 40% 17 PA
34220 Southland 10-Red 1374 6-11 32% 10 LA
34221 Elevate Academy 14 EAVC Gray 1374 6-14 30% 14 NC
34222 Nox 18-Solar 1374 8-9 44% 18 PA
34223 Top Flight 15-Rho 1374 2-3 40% 15 IL
34224 IPV 15 Royal 1374 24-19 56% 15 IL
34225 MN Premier 14-1 1374 14-16 47% 14 MN
34226 WPA 17-Zacherl 1374 3-9 25% 17 PA
34227 Northern Impact 14-Ub 1374 4-5 44% 14 MN
34228 Air Capital Aces 17-1 1374 0-4 0% 17 KS
34229 ABV Flash 14-S - katie 1374 8-15 35% 14 CA
34230 Apex 10 Predators 1374 5-10 29% 10 IL
34231 Miami Bombers 18-Gabriela 1374 16-14 53% 18 FL
34232 Mindset Regional 18 1374 2-3 40% 18 IL
34233 United 12-Blue 1374 10-17 37% 12 AL
34234 SWVA Elite 15-Kaylee 1374 10-16 38% 15 VA
34235 Mission 12-Green 1374 2-9 18% 12 IL
34236 CJ Heat 16-Black 2 1374 1-4 20% 16 NJ
34237 SNVF 15 ECLIPSE 1374 22-43 34% 15 WA
34238 Cloud 17-Phet/chalee 1374 0-6 0% 17 NV
34239 Princeton JO 15-2 1374 6-13 32% 15 MN
34240 GHVBC 15-1 1374 0-4 0% 15 MN
34241 Hunters Creek Volleyball Academy 16 16 Windermere 1374 10-13 43% 16 FL
34242 OCVC 10-Taylor 1374 14-23 37% 10 WY
34243 Southern Focus Volleyball Club 17 Extreme Focus 1374 9-16 36% 17
34244 OYA 16-6-7 1374 1-5 17% 16 CA
34245 Left Coast 12-Blue 1374 12-15 44% 12 CA
34246 Thunder 15-1 1374 13-21 34% 15 AL
34247 New Heights Volleyball Club 15-1 1374 5-8 38% 15 WY
34248 Squad 12-Premier 1374 6-13 32% 12 NV
34249 NEVA 14-Blue maliyah 1374 9-12 32% 14 UT
34250 Mintonette Sports 13-3 1374 17-38 31% 13 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.