Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 684 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34151 TAV 16-Graham 1375 5-12 25% 16 TX
34152 573 Missouri Juniors 18-2 1375 0-4 0% 18 MO
34153 Swarm 14-Black 1375 5-9 36% 14 MO
34154 MN North 12-2 black 1375 17-24 41% 12 MN
34155 Academy 12-Jade 1375 12-25 32% 12 NC
34156 Ascent 13-1 1375 2-5 29% 13 AZ
34157 Flight 16 Pratt 1375 17-23 43% 16 MI
34158 SCWave 18-Wave 1375 14-17 45% 18 IN
34159 414 13-White 1375 0-4 0% 13 WI
34160 Aspire 15 1375 2-3 40% 15 OK
34161 KVA 14 Angels (NE) (96) 1375 0-9 0% 14 HI
34162 MN Attack 16-3 1375 7-11 39% 16 MN
34163 Headlines VBC 13-Navy 1375 21-31 40% 13 OH
34164 St. George Aces 13-Brittany 1375 0-3 0% 13 UT
34165 Sidewinder 16-1 1375 25-32 44% 16 AZ
34166 Alpha Performance Volleyball Club 13 Alpha Grey (PR) 1375 9-13 41% 13 KY
34167 Elevate Ak 15-Blue 1375 7-10 41% 15 AK
34168 REDLINE 13-Black 1375 10-16 38% 13 MI
34169 Ignite 15-Blaze 1375 14-37 27% 15 TX
34170 DBQ Insanity 10 1375 2-9 17% 10 IA
34171 Angels 16-Vanessa 1375 14-19 38% 16 NM
34172 Hawaiian Time AZ Ohai Ali'i 18 1375 3-4 43% 18 CA
34173 913Athletics 15-Black 1375 4-11 27% 15 KS
34174 949 G16 Gold 1375 16-21 43% 16 CA
34175 Aftershock 16-Red 1375 15-21 42% 16 CA
34176 Mountain1 17-2 kylee 1375 11-24 28% 17 MT
34177 Legacy 17-Elite west 1375 23-24 49% 17 MI
34178 HP 17-Elite gray 1375 13-17 43% 17 MI
34179 Legacy Elite VBA 15-E 1375 17-27 39% 15 OH
34180 OCVC 12 1375 5-10 33% 12 KY
34181 Red Rock 12-Premier lucas - rwc 1375 8-13 38% 12 CA
34182 Jr Vikings 14-White 1375 15-22 41% 14 WI
34183 WWVA 16-Aces 1375 1-4 20% 16 CO
34184 SGJO 10-1 1375 0-4 0% 10 MN
34185 CenTX Next Level 12-White 1375 5-9 36% 12 TX
34186 LAVA West 12-Premier 1375 15-27 36% 12 CA
34187 DaKine 16-Regional pink 1375 16-31 34% 16 WA
34188 WVBA 16-Black 1375 32-34 48% 16 WA
34189 Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mcchickens 1375 1-4 20% 16 WA
34190 CO Force 15 Teal 1375 25-30 45% 15 CO
34191 Watertown JO 15 1375 0-4 0% 15 MN
34192 Solon 13-White 1375 3-6 33% 13 IA
34193 K Elites VBC STL U 13-Royal 1375 17-16 47% 13 MO
34194 Kansas Rise VBC G13-2 1375 5-6 45% 13 KS
34195 Rapid Fire 11-Blue 1375 9-12 43% 11 IL
34196 GPVBC 16-2 1375 3-6 33% 16 OK
34197 WVBA 14-Regional purple 1375 0-3 0% 14 FL
34198 Tribe 14-Regional blue 1375 11-24 31% 14 FL
34199 Copper State 15-1 1375 13-15 46% 15 AZ
34200 Dynasty 16 10 1375 4-9 31% 10 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.