Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 681 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34001 SFSVC 13-2 alyssa 1377 12-14 46% 13 NM
34002 Club Fusion 13-Fire 1376 4-7 36% 13 IL
34003 ESVBC 17-Tsunami 1376 10-16 36% 17 MD
34004 Top Flight 15-Chi 1376 2-3 40% 15 IL
34005 Shock 15-Strike 1376 12-13 48% 15 IL
34006 Momentum 15-4 1376 3-4 43% 15 IN
34007 Iowa Heart 15-Red 1376 9-16 36% 15 IA
34008 319 United 15 Jaidyn 1376 4-6 40% 15 IA
34009 Landshark 15-Blue 1376 5-13 28% 15 KS
34010 PointBreakVBC 15-1 santos 1376 2-6 25% 15 HI
34011 LA6 15-Destini 1376 9-12 43% 15 LA
34012 SSWolfpack 15-Bluewolves 1376 6-8 32% 15 MA
34013 Roots 18-2 blue 1376 11-29 28% 18 TX
34014 nmdiggers 15-1 1376 1-4 20% 15 MI
34015 MDJRS 13-Regional yellow 1376 10-13 36% 13 MD
34016 808 Athletic Club 10-Co-ed blue 1376 2-8 20% 10 HI
34017 Chelsea Piers Volleyball Club 15 U15 National 1376 1-6 14% 15 CT
34018 Freeze 15-Black 1376 25-28 47% 15 MN
34019 North Coast 15-Orange 1376 12-21 34% 15 CA
34020 C3VB 15-1 1376 18-22 45% 15 NH
34021 E3VB 15-Empower blue 1376 16-21 42% 15 NM
34022 Rose City Netters 14-Hitz 1376 1-3 25% 14 WY
34023 ATHENA VB 10-1 gold 1376 9-23 28% 10 OR
34024 DaKine 14-Regional white 1376 20-19 51% 14 WA
34025 KVA Kelly 10 1376 0-4 0% 10 TX
34026 BVC 11 Lacy 1376 7-7 50% 11 AL
34027 Iron VC 11-1 1376 3-5 30% 11 AL
34028 Queen City 14 Freedom 1376 5-8 33% 14 PA
34029 Athlete HQ 14-Rightnowar 1376 14-21 40% 14 OH
34030 NE Elite 14-Vortex 1376 3-4 43% 14 NE
34031 NWAS VBC 15 Alpha 1376 20-37 35% 15 WA
34032 Perryville Volleyball Academy 14-Blue 1376 7-9 39% 14 MO
34033 Cincy Crush 11-2 1376 5-9 36% 11 OH
34034 MVC 11-2 1376 2-7 20% 11 OH
34035 FORZA1 NORTH 16-Nat black 1376 6-12 33% 16 CA
34036 SMASH Volleyball 14-Galaxy 1376 1-6 14% 14 MA
34037 Lex United 14-White 1376 38-41 48% 14 KY
34038 Lake Cumberland Splash 14 Lake Cumberland Splash Blue (PR) 1376 0-4 0% 14 KY
34039 Southern Heat 11 1376 2-7 22% 11 WI
34040 SVBC Spirit 16-Navy 1376 1-4 20% 16 IA
34041 OCR 18-Black 1376 15-14 52% 18 CA
34042 METRO Elite 14-Blue 1376 6-9 40% 14 GA
34043 630 Volleyball 16-2 1376 24-25 49% 16 IL
34044 Mountain View Volleyball Club 12 MVVC Youth G 4/5-Jamie 1376 2-6 25% 12 CA
34045 Rev 16-3 thunder 1376 16-20 44% 16 IN
34046 VoltageVB 14-Blue-kj 1376 18-23 44% 14 FL
34047 Elevate AK 18-Blue 1376 4-12 25% 18 AK
34048 NBVBC 16 1376 8-11 42% 16 MI
34049 SVE 12-1 1376 10-23 29% 12 GA
34050 Red Rock 14-Andrea - san francisco 1376 14-31 31% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.