Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 682 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
34051 OYA 14-Premier 1376 8-17 32% 14 CA
34052 KVBC 16-S 1376 13-21 38% 16 MN
34053 Prime Volleyball 17 Prime WHITE 1376 5-9 33% 17 UT
34054 Aspire 14-Teal 1376 3-6 33% 14 AZ
34055 417 Juniors 16-5 1376 2-2 50% 16 MO
34056 Bolts 12-S 1376 0-4 0% 12 IA
34057 Ark Volley 14-Local plus- navy 1376 1-4 20% 14 AR
34058 Truepoint 17-S 1376 1-4 20% 17 TX
34059 Moxie 17 1376 0-3 0% 17 TX
34060 River City 13-Blue 1376 10-18 36% 13 WI
34061 Alpha Performance Volleyball Club 12 Alpha Teal 1376 1-4 20% 12 KY
34062 UBVBC 16-Teal 1376 0-3 0% 16 NY
34063 PV 12-Silver 1376 0-4 0% 12 MA
34064 Dragons 12-Ami/emma 1376 9-12 38% 12 MA
34065 Avoli 17-F carly 1376 3-5 38% 17 PR
34066 NPJ Salem 16-Black 1376 20-41 33% 16 OR
34067 Dynamic 17-Kay 1376 1-3 20% 17 PA
34068 Rosemount Irish 12-1 1376 7-17 27% 12 MN
34069 Crossfire 12-2 1376 9-9 50% 12 MN
34070 TEV 16-Alyssa/caleb 1376 12-17 41% 16 TN
34071 Raleigh 13-White 1376 3-7 30% 13 NC
34072 Ohana Volleyball 16-Blue 1376 3-7 30% 16 TX
34073 Laredo Infinity 16-Black 1376 12-13 48% 16 TX
34074 ASVC 14-N1 1376 25-24 51% 14 AZ
34075 FVC 13-Tide 1376 20-32 38% 13 MD
34076 Laulima 16-Pink 1376 20-23 44% 16 UT
34077 LAVA West 17-Molten er 1376 23-26 47% 17 CA
34078 417 MoJrs 17-Reg royal 1376 2-8 20% 17 MO
34079 HEAT 13-Morgan 1376 17-24 41% 13 FL
34080 Redline Zia VBC 13-1 1376 0-0 0% 13 CO
34081 FORM 13-Blue 1376 17-25 40% 13 CO
34082 Emerald Force 12 1376 10-14 42% 12 TN
34083 TEV 12-M morgan 1376 2-3 29% 12 TN
34084 Winona 17 1376 2-6 25% 17 MN
34085 Zuma Bay 13 Rogue 1376 10-17 37% 13 CA
34086 Presidío Vortex 12 1376 9-19 32% 12 TX
34087 NIVBC 12-Luke 1376 1-4 20% 12 WA
34088 MOJO Elite Volleyball 12-Pink 1376 13-21 38% 12 VA
34089 Generations vbc 17-1 1376 24-32 41% 17 MA
34090 ADK DIG 13 1376 1-4 14% 13 NY
34091 Apex VBTC 14-Peak white 1376 5-9 36% 14 OH
34092 PAVC - NC 15-Onyx 1376 30-28 52% 15 NC
34093 Tyler Jrs 16 1376 5-9 29% 16
34094 RVC318 17-Shr 1376 1-4 20% 17
34095 iCrush 11-White 1375 2-5 25% 11
34096 Architects 14-Black 1375 1-4 13% 14
34097 Momentum 15-Black 1375 16-15 52% 15 FL
34098 SSVA 15-Black 1375 9-9 50% 15 PA
34099 Warrior 15-Ruby 1375 19-19 50% 15 FL
34100 CSRA Heat 12-Red 1375 11-14 44% 12 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.