Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 658 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32851 LEGACY 15-Premier ernesto 1388 3-5 38% 15 FL
32852 Fusion 13 Titanium 1388 10-16 38% 13 CA
32853 Veritas Volleyball Club 17-Dottie 1388 24-40 38% 17 AL
32854 TDV 17Elite 1388 16-26 38% 17 OH
32855 Prism 17 Aquamarine 1388 26-42 38% 17 WA
32856 oe 17-1 1388 11-18 38% 17 OH
32857 VESTA 16-1 1388 10-16 38% 16 CA
32858 Synergy 15 Calcium 1388 19-31 37% 15 PA
32859 VIPERS 14-Elite 1388 18-31 37% 14 FL
32860 FWFIRE 16-1w 1388 7-11 37% 16 TX
32861 DG Warriors 16-Gold 1388 18-31 37% 16 OH
32862 212 15-1 1388 18-26 37% 15 TX
32863 AEV 16 American 1388 4-7 36% 16 TX
32864 Dayton Jrs 18-Blue 1388 9-16 36% 18 OH
32865 Absolute Zero BVC 18-Rankine 1388 4-7 36% 18 WA
32866 MT NW 14-3 madi 1388 11-14 34% 14 MT
32867 MVC Panthers 14-Black 1388 6-12 33% 14 IL
32868 Princeton 14-White 1388 10-20 33% 14 NJ
32869 Tribe Doral 14 Premier 1388 17-34 33% 14 FL
32870 1United 14-Texoma 1388 10-15 33% 14 TX
32871 STOCKDALE RVC 12 1388 5-10 33% 12 TX
32872 JJVA Club 16-E 1388 4-8 33% 16 FL
32873 Elite Juniors 12-2 1388 3-6 33% 12 OH
32874 New Haven Juniors 14-1 1388 8-15 32% 14 CT
32875 LIVBC Girls 16-Red 1388 6-13 32% 16 NY
32876 WGVA 16-Red 1388 17-38 31% 16 GA
32877 Iowa Impact 18-1 elite 1388 11-26 30% 18 IA
32878 Rise 12-1 1388 4-10 29% 12 WV
32879 Ignition 16-1 1388 2-5 29% 16 WA
32880 Lewistown 12-1 1388 6-11 26% 12 MT
32881 SVBC 15-Teal 1388 6-15 26% 15 IA
32882 MPV 15-Elite green 1388 8-18 25% 15 UT
32883 Pipeline VC 16-Skyline 1388 2-6 25% 16 IL
32884 Peach City Volleyball Club 14 14U WHITE PCVC 1388 2-6 22% 14 AL
32885 Vipers VBC 16-S 1388 2-4 22% 16 FL
32886 MN Attack 12-Purple 1388 1-4 20% 12 MN
32887 CVH SELECT 10-1 1388 1-4 20% 10 PR
32888 MVP 17-Green 1388 1-4 20% 17 OH
32889 KC Surge VBC 13-1 1388 1-3 20% 13 KS
32890 Flyers 15-Usa-john 1388 2-8 20% 15 TX
32891 Chewblocka 15 1388 1-4 20% 15 NV
32892 Petite Elite 12 Stevi 1388 3-9 19% 12 TX
32893 NU Breed 13-Reedley 1388 1-5 17% 13 CA
32894 Monti Club 15-1 1388 1-5 17% 15 MN
32895 Six Pack Flight 14 1388 1-5 17% 14 IA
32896 Western Saratoga 14 1388 1-4 17% 14 NY
32897 Shockwave VB Academy 11-1 1388 1-6 14% 11 KS
32898 RIZE 13-Heather 1388 0-3 0% 13 ID
32899 Vaqueras 10-F iralis 1388 0-3 0% 10 PR
32900 Lancers 11-White 1388 0-3 0% 11 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.