2025-2026 Season — Page 658 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32851 | LEGACY 15-Premier ernesto | 1388 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | FL |
| 32852 | Fusion 13 Titanium | 1388 | 10-16 | 38% | 13 | CA |
| 32853 | Veritas Volleyball Club 17-Dottie | 1388 | 24-40 | 38% | 17 | AL |
| 32854 | TDV 17Elite | 1388 | 16-26 | 38% | 17 | OH |
| 32855 | Prism 17 Aquamarine | 1388 | 26-42 | 38% | 17 | WA |
| 32856 | oe 17-1 | 1388 | 11-18 | 38% | 17 | OH |
| 32857 | VESTA 16-1 | 1388 | 10-16 | 38% | 16 | CA |
| 32858 | Synergy 15 Calcium | 1388 | 19-31 | 37% | 15 | PA |
| 32859 | VIPERS 14-Elite | 1388 | 18-31 | 37% | 14 | FL |
| 32860 | FWFIRE 16-1w | 1388 | 7-11 | 37% | 16 | TX |
| 32861 | DG Warriors 16-Gold | 1388 | 18-31 | 37% | 16 | OH |
| 32862 | 212 15-1 | 1388 | 18-26 | 37% | 15 | TX |
| 32863 | AEV 16 American | 1388 | 4-7 | 36% | 16 | TX |
| 32864 | Dayton Jrs 18-Blue | 1388 | 9-16 | 36% | 18 | OH |
| 32865 | Absolute Zero BVC 18-Rankine | 1388 | 4-7 | 36% | 18 | WA |
| 32866 | MT NW 14-3 madi | 1388 | 11-14 | 34% | 14 | MT |
| 32867 | MVC Panthers 14-Black | 1388 | 6-12 | 33% | 14 | IL |
| 32868 | Princeton 14-White | 1388 | 10-20 | 33% | 14 | NJ |
| 32869 | Tribe Doral 14 Premier | 1388 | 17-34 | 33% | 14 | FL |
| 32870 | 1United 14-Texoma | 1388 | 10-15 | 33% | 14 | TX |
| 32871 | STOCKDALE RVC 12 | 1388 | 5-10 | 33% | 12 | TX |
| 32872 | JJVA Club 16-E | 1388 | 4-8 | 33% | 16 | FL |
| 32873 | Elite Juniors 12-2 | 1388 | 3-6 | 33% | 12 | OH |
| 32874 | New Haven Juniors 14-1 | 1388 | 8-15 | 32% | 14 | CT |
| 32875 | LIVBC Girls 16-Red | 1388 | 6-13 | 32% | 16 | NY |
| 32876 | WGVA 16-Red | 1388 | 17-38 | 31% | 16 | GA |
| 32877 | Iowa Impact 18-1 elite | 1388 | 11-26 | 30% | 18 | IA |
| 32878 | Rise 12-1 | 1388 | 4-10 | 29% | 12 | WV |
| 32879 | Ignition 16-1 | 1388 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | WA |
| 32880 | Lewistown 12-1 | 1388 | 6-11 | 26% | 12 | MT |
| 32881 | SVBC 15-Teal | 1388 | 6-15 | 26% | 15 | IA |
| 32882 | MPV 15-Elite green | 1388 | 8-18 | 25% | 15 | UT |
| 32883 | Pipeline VC 16-Skyline | 1388 | 2-6 | 25% | 16 | IL |
| 32884 | Peach City Volleyball Club 14 14U WHITE PCVC | 1388 | 2-6 | 22% | 14 | AL |
| 32885 | Vipers VBC 16-S | 1388 | 2-4 | 22% | 16 | FL |
| 32886 | MN Attack 12-Purple | 1388 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | MN |
| 32887 | CVH SELECT 10-1 | 1388 | 1-4 | 20% | 10 | PR |
| 32888 | MVP 17-Green | 1388 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | OH |
| 32889 | KC Surge VBC 13-1 | 1388 | 1-3 | 20% | 13 | KS |
| 32890 | Flyers 15-Usa-john | 1388 | 2-8 | 20% | 15 | TX |
| 32891 | Chewblocka 15 | 1388 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | NV |
| 32892 | Petite Elite 12 Stevi | 1388 | 3-9 | 19% | 12 | TX |
| 32893 | NU Breed 13-Reedley | 1388 | 1-5 | 17% | 13 | CA |
| 32894 | Monti Club 15-1 | 1388 | 1-5 | 17% | 15 | MN |
| 32895 | Six Pack Flight 14 | 1388 | 1-5 | 17% | 14 | IA |
| 32896 | Western Saratoga 14 | 1388 | 1-4 | 17% | 14 | NY |
| 32897 | Shockwave VB Academy 11-1 | 1388 | 1-6 | 14% | 11 | KS |
| 32898 | RIZE 13-Heather | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | ID |
| 32899 | Vaqueras 10-F iralis | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | PR |
| 32900 | Lancers 11-White | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 11 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.