Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 657 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32801 ProPlay 12-Deanna 1389 15-19 44% 12 CA
32802 SA Force 13 Teal 1389 11-12 44% 13 TX
32803 BRYC 13 Royal 1389 22-27 44% 13 VA
32804 AZ REV 12-Hype squad 1389 12-15 44% 12 AZ
32805 Stumptown 12-1 blue 1389 7-9 44% 12 OR
32806 BVA - Lions 13-Aspire 1389 15-17 43% 13 IL
32807 Dynamite 15-1 1389 13-17 43% 15 TN
32808 MGA 18-White 1389 16-22 42% 18 MA
32809 Force 14-Adidas sel bl 1388 20-15 57% 14 MI
32810 WW 16 1388 1-4 20% 16
32811 Oakville Thunder Volleyball Club 15 15u Strike 1388 1-4 20% 15 ON
32812 Chicago Elite 15 Max 1388 22-17 56% 15 IL
32813 CGVOS 16 1388 16-13 55% 16 AZ
32814 Velocity 219 18-National 1388 24-20 55% 18 IN
32815 Oakland Volleyball 14-S - eta 1388 27-23 54% 14 CA
32816 PCVBC 14-Lightning 1388 8-7 53% 14 OH
32817 Stingray 14-Regional 1388 6-6 50% 14 CA
32818 Elevate 15-Queen 1388 25-27 48% 15 SC
32819 DCVA 16 Victor 1388 14-15 48% 16 NM
32820 Rockwood Thunder 12-Blue 1388 14-15 48% 12 MO
32821 Va Wave 15 Surge 1388 23-26 47% 15 VA
32822 WVC 13-Green-1 1388 24-27 47% 13 VA
32823 Empower VBC 15-1 1388 27-31 47% 15 WI
32824 RAV 14-Blue 1388 14-14 47% 14 GA
32825 MANGO TIDE 15-Breeze 1388 26-29 47% 15 CA
32826 305VBC 17-N ledesma 1388 19-22 46% 17 FL
32827 HEAT 10-Bryan 1388 9-11 45% 10 FL
32828 ECVC 18-Pink 1388 19-23 45% 18 VA
32829 Titanas 14-3 1388 4-5 44% 14 PR
32830 Barnum Impact 17-1 1388 4-5 44% 17 MN
32831 FC United 15-Teal 1388 7-9 44% 15 MO
32832 AVA 15-K 1388 8-9 44% 15 LA
32833 Highlands Performance VB 14-2 1388 3-3 43% 14 MO
32834 Reign 15-S 1388 17-21 43% 15 TX
32835 METRO Elite 17-Blue 1388 6-8 43% 17 GA
32836 VCN 14-Navy 1388 3-4 43% 14 NE
32837 Panther 14-2 1388 3-4 43% 14 CO
32838 Altitude 11-Black 1388 10-13 43% 11 AZ
32839 H2 15-Illinois_warren 1388 17-23 43% 15 MO
32840 Strive 14-1 1388 13-18 42% 14 PA
32841 LEGACY 15-Premier vince 1388 11-15 42% 15 FL
32842 Reign 15-Black 1388 31-37 42% 15 FL
32843 New WaveS 14-Kale 1388 5-7 42% 14 FL
32844 SKEVA 12-Blue 1388 13-18 42% 12 KY
32845 Miami Hype 15-Power1 1388 31-44 41% 15 FL
32846 Southwest Arkansas Storm 18 1388 4-6 40% 18 AR
32847 NASA BHM 12-BLACK 1388 14-21 40% 12 AL
32848 Rev 14-2 cobras 1388 22-33 40% 14 IN
32849 Rev 15-3 warriors 1388 14-22 39% 15 IN
32850 Prospects VBA 11-Aspire b 1388 9-15 38% 11 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.