Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 656 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32751 K1 16-Ruben 1389 7-13 35% 16 PR
32752 Lomanview 11-Keisha 1389 5-10 33% 11 PR
32753 ND Elite 17-Emery 1389 9-16 33% 17 ND
32754 Grandview VBC 14-Crimson 1389 3-6 33% 14 WA
32755 ATOMIC 11-Smack premier 1389 25-50 33% 11 AZ
32756 SVC NGV 17-Bogdan 1389 10-21 32% 17 GA
32757 Girls 17u Elite 1389 13-29 31% 17 NV
32758 Touch 3 16 1389 4-9 31% 16 CA
32759 VoltageVB 16-Blue-bree 1389 4-9 31% 16 FL
32760 WSA Gators 15-Elite 1389 14-31 31% 15 FL
32761 No Coast 11-Seaside 1389 9-21 30% 11 MO
32762 Metrowest VBC 15-Maroon 1389 6-10 30% 15 MA
32763 West Side 16-S. monita 1389 4-10 29% 16 MN
32764 BSVBC 17-Blue 1389 9-22 28% 17 IL
32765 Tstreet IE 15-Cesar 1389 13-35 27% 15 CA
32766 Power 15-White 1389 11-25 26% 15 TX
32767 MCJO 16-S 1389 1-3 25% 16 MN
32768 CROI VBC 12 CROI VBC Farrell (HO) 1389 1-3 25% 12 IN
32769 PVA Select 14-1 1389 4-10 24% 14 KS
32770 Oneonta 16-2 1389 7-14 24% 16 AL
32771 Memphis Volleyball Academy 14-Blue 1389 1-4 20% 14 MS
32772 Anthracite Attack 17U BLACK 1389 1-4 20% 17 PA
32773 Six Pack Flight 16 1389 1-5 17% 16 IA
32774 EC Volley 13 1389 2-7 15% 13 IA
32775 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 13 SWVC RS13-MURRAY 1389 0-7 0% 13 WY
32776 SOCO Swift 13 1389 0-3 0% 13 CO
32777 WVBA 12-Regional black 1389 0-3 0% 12 FL
32778 NIVBC 14-Shaina 1389 0-4 0% 14 WA
32779 TX IMPACT 14-3 white 1389 0-3 0% 14 TX
32780 WPA 15-S 1389 0-4 0% 15 PA
32781 West County 15-S 1389 0-3 0% 15 CA
32782 Club Serve 12-White 1389 0-3 0% 12 MO
32783 Oakville Thunder Volleyball Club 15 Bolts (CA) 1389 0-3 0% 15 ON
32784 CGY Bulls 15 1389 1-6 14% 15
32785 Prolink 12 Deb 1389 26-23 53% 12 GA
32786 LCVC 18-Red 1389 12-12 50% 18 IN
32787 Mass Power VB 15-Pink 1389 20-20 50% 15 MA
32788 Madtown 15-Red 1389 5-4 50% 15 WI
32789 Magnitude VBC 13-R 1389 18-17 50% 13 AZ
32790 PSVBA 15-Elite 1 1389 35-36 49% 15 WA
32791 Top Select 16-Top yellow 1389 33-36 48% 16 FL
32792 Voodoo Volleyball Club 14 Voodoo Stars (BY) 1389 15-16 48% 14 LA
32793 GP 15-Local black 1389 20-22 48% 15 FL
32794 Force Volleyball Club 15-1 1389 16-17 48% 15 MS
32795 TAV 15-Glen rose red 1389 8-8 47% 15 TX
32796 Dynamite 18-1 1389 18-20 47% 18 TN
32797 WPVC 13-Elite black 1389 29-33 47% 13 FL
32798 KCJV 16-Blue 1389 12-14 46% 16 SC
32799 Mintonette Sports 13-4 1389 19-23 45% 13 OH
32800 TEV 12-Cb lucy 1389 9-11 45% 12 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.