Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 655 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32701 HPVBC Forge 16 1390 16-19 46% 16 TX
32702 Diablo 14-4 white 1390 20-24 45% 14 CA
32703 Elevate 14 Preslee 1390 15-19 44% 14 SC
32704 Allegro 18-Scarlet 1390 17-22 44% 18 NJ
32705 MDJRS 13-Regional black 1390 15-15 44% 13 MD
32706 Next Gen 13-Black 1390 23-29 44% 13 MO
32707 NW Jrs 15-White 1390 20-26 43% 15 WA
32708 CEV Onyx 16-3 1390 6-8 43% 16 OH
32709 CJVA 15-Red 1390 10-13 43% 15 NJ
32710 C2K Volleyball Club 15 15 TLauth (OV) 1390 2-4 33% 15
32711 Xcel 14-Armour kiele 1390 12-15 44% 14 NC
32712 SVC 14-Pink 1390 17-24 41% 14 GA
32713 Playeros 13-5 garressa 1390 4-6 40% 13 FL
32714 Star Aquila 17-1 1390 2-2 40% 17
32715 SG Elite 11-Excel 1390 13-15 46% 11 CA
32716 VIBE Volleyball 15-U peters 1390 2-6 25% 15 CA
32717 Dynamite 15-Lexy 1389 11-13 46% 15 FL
32718 Dig Deep 14-Sapphire 1389 11-13 42% 14 NH
32719 RVA 14-Grinley 1389 13-18 42% 14 IA
32720 Actsports 14-Knox 1389 5-7 42% 14 VA
32721 SEVA 17-Navy jazmine 1389 11-15 42% 17 NC
32722 ACT 15-Corey 1389 14-20 41% 15 CA
32723 NRG 12-Bolt navy 1389 9-12 41% 12 TX
32724 Crush 13-S 1389 17-24 41% 13 CA
32725 MN CORE 13-2 1389 7-10 41% 13 MN
32726 Velocity 12-Red 2 1389 6-9 40% 12 MS
32727 SMBV 14-2 1389 4-6 40% 14 NC
32728 ZONA 14 1389 4-6 40% 14 AZ
32729 Rose City 17-1 1389 4-6 40% 17 MI
32730 Rogue 15-White 1389 4-6 40% 15 OH
32731 Matchbox 15-Black 1389 4-6 40% 15 SD
32732 Salty 15-Pacific 1389 17-24 40% 15 TX
32733 Net Force 12-3 orange 1389 8-12 40% 12 IA
32734 CE LFT - Lite 12-Cathryn 1389 4-6 40% 12 LA
32735 Stormbreaker 16 Valkyrie 1389 15-23 39% 16 CA
32736 HRVC 17-National black 1389 18-28 39% 17 NC
32737 Red Storm 14-Elite white 1389 14-22 39% 14 LA
32738 Herederas 17-Rickie 1389 3-5 38% 17 NV
32739 A4 Volley 15-Daniel 1389 19-31 38% 15 CA
32740 Legends 16-2 eggy 1389 3-5 38% 16 PR
32741 Mission Trails 14-Gabriela 1389 3-5 38% 14 CA
32742 Chicago Red Stars 14 Red Stars Second City 1389 11-18 38% 14 IL
32743 Nassau Elite Volleyball Club 16 U16 Silver (FL) (2) 1389 5-8 38% 16 FL
32744 Game Day 16-2 1389 15-26 37% 16 OR
32745 LTX SELECT 17-Blue 1389 11-19 37% 17 TX
32746 Texas Diamonds 14 Teal 1389 10-12 36% 14 TX
32747 Milwaukee Jr's 17-Elite 1389 52-93 36% 17 WI
32748 Royal Digs Volleyball 17 RDVC Gold (BY) 1389 6-11 35% 17 LA
32749 RVC 18-Black 1389 9-16 35% 18 TX
32750 Kansas Krush 15-1 1389 6-7 35% 15 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.