2025-2026 Season — Page 655 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32701 | HPVBC Forge 16 | 1390 | 16-19 | 46% | 16 | TX |
| 32702 | Diablo 14-4 white | 1390 | 20-24 | 45% | 14 | CA |
| 32703 | Elevate 14 Preslee | 1390 | 15-19 | 44% | 14 | SC |
| 32704 | Allegro 18-Scarlet | 1390 | 17-22 | 44% | 18 | NJ |
| 32705 | MDJRS 13-Regional black | 1390 | 15-15 | 44% | 13 | MD |
| 32706 | Next Gen 13-Black | 1390 | 23-29 | 44% | 13 | MO |
| 32707 | NW Jrs 15-White | 1390 | 20-26 | 43% | 15 | WA |
| 32708 | CEV Onyx 16-3 | 1390 | 6-8 | 43% | 16 | OH |
| 32709 | CJVA 15-Red | 1390 | 10-13 | 43% | 15 | NJ |
| 32710 | C2K Volleyball Club 15 15 TLauth (OV) | 1390 | 2-4 | 33% | 15 | |
| 32711 | Xcel 14-Armour kiele | 1390 | 12-15 | 44% | 14 | NC |
| 32712 | SVC 14-Pink | 1390 | 17-24 | 41% | 14 | GA |
| 32713 | Playeros 13-5 garressa | 1390 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | FL |
| 32714 | Star Aquila 17-1 | 1390 | 2-2 | 40% | 17 | |
| 32715 | SG Elite 11-Excel | 1390 | 13-15 | 46% | 11 | CA |
| 32716 | VIBE Volleyball 15-U peters | 1390 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | CA |
| 32717 | Dynamite 15-Lexy | 1389 | 11-13 | 46% | 15 | FL |
| 32718 | Dig Deep 14-Sapphire | 1389 | 11-13 | 42% | 14 | NH |
| 32719 | RVA 14-Grinley | 1389 | 13-18 | 42% | 14 | IA |
| 32720 | Actsports 14-Knox | 1389 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | VA |
| 32721 | SEVA 17-Navy jazmine | 1389 | 11-15 | 42% | 17 | NC |
| 32722 | ACT 15-Corey | 1389 | 14-20 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 32723 | NRG 12-Bolt navy | 1389 | 9-12 | 41% | 12 | TX |
| 32724 | Crush 13-S | 1389 | 17-24 | 41% | 13 | CA |
| 32725 | MN CORE 13-2 | 1389 | 7-10 | 41% | 13 | MN |
| 32726 | Velocity 12-Red 2 | 1389 | 6-9 | 40% | 12 | MS |
| 32727 | SMBV 14-2 | 1389 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | NC |
| 32728 | ZONA 14 | 1389 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | AZ |
| 32729 | Rose City 17-1 | 1389 | 4-6 | 40% | 17 | MI |
| 32730 | Rogue 15-White | 1389 | 4-6 | 40% | 15 | OH |
| 32731 | Matchbox 15-Black | 1389 | 4-6 | 40% | 15 | SD |
| 32732 | Salty 15-Pacific | 1389 | 17-24 | 40% | 15 | TX |
| 32733 | Net Force 12-3 orange | 1389 | 8-12 | 40% | 12 | IA |
| 32734 | CE LFT - Lite 12-Cathryn | 1389 | 4-6 | 40% | 12 | LA |
| 32735 | Stormbreaker 16 Valkyrie | 1389 | 15-23 | 39% | 16 | CA |
| 32736 | HRVC 17-National black | 1389 | 18-28 | 39% | 17 | NC |
| 32737 | Red Storm 14-Elite white | 1389 | 14-22 | 39% | 14 | LA |
| 32738 | Herederas 17-Rickie | 1389 | 3-5 | 38% | 17 | NV |
| 32739 | A4 Volley 15-Daniel | 1389 | 19-31 | 38% | 15 | CA |
| 32740 | Legends 16-2 eggy | 1389 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | PR |
| 32741 | Mission Trails 14-Gabriela | 1389 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | CA |
| 32742 | Chicago Red Stars 14 Red Stars Second City | 1389 | 11-18 | 38% | 14 | IL |
| 32743 | Nassau Elite Volleyball Club 16 U16 Silver (FL) (2) | 1389 | 5-8 | 38% | 16 | FL |
| 32744 | Game Day 16-2 | 1389 | 15-26 | 37% | 16 | OR |
| 32745 | LTX SELECT 17-Blue | 1389 | 11-19 | 37% | 17 | TX |
| 32746 | Texas Diamonds 14 Teal | 1389 | 10-12 | 36% | 14 | TX |
| 32747 | Milwaukee Jr's 17-Elite | 1389 | 52-93 | 36% | 17 | WI |
| 32748 | Royal Digs Volleyball 17 RDVC Gold (BY) | 1389 | 6-11 | 35% | 17 | LA |
| 32749 | RVC 18-Black | 1389 | 9-16 | 35% | 18 | TX |
| 32750 | Kansas Krush 15-1 | 1389 | 6-7 | 35% | 15 | KS |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.