Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 654 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32651 Capitals 14-National 1390 15-32 32% 14 NJ
32652 Surge 14-3 eb os 1390 8-17 32% 14 AL
32653 Greenwich Volleyball Club 12-1 1390 11-25 31% 12 CT
32654 Inspire CLE 12 Twilight 1390 4-9 31% 12 OH
32655 MN Attack 17-2 1390 7-16 30% 17 MN
32656 Rampage 16-1 1390 2-5 29% 16 WA
32657 Slammers 17-Cameron 1390 2-5 29% 17 NC
32658 H. Prep Dev 11-Navy 1390 4-8 27% 11 TX
32659 RVC 16-Black 1390 13-31 27% 16 TX
32660 Maui Mana 16-Girls 1390 9-24 27% 16 HI
32661 Burley 13 1390 1-3 25% 13 UT
32662 Velocity 11-Red 1390 5-15 25% 11 MS
32663 Strive 17-1 1390 13-18 42% 17 PA
32664 South County 13-Kate/skylin 1390 5-9 24% 13 UT
32665 LES 15 Cynthia 1390 5-13 24% 15 AL
32666 Dogie VB 12-2 1390 2-5 22% 12 MT
32667 Waco Lightning 13-Blue 1390 4-11 22% 13 TX
32668 SPVA 12-Eclipse 1390 1-4 20% 12 DE
32669 Independent 12-Deckert 1390 1-4 20% 12 IN
32670 Absolute Zero BVC 14-Big macs 1390 1-4 20% 14 WA
32671 Flight 13-Raftery 1390 1-4 20% 13 MI
32672 Blue Water Wave Volleyball Club 13-2 1390 1-4 20% 13 MI
32673 Wolfpack 17-Elite black 1390 1-3 20% 17 MA
32674 Champion 17-R purple 1390 1-4 20% 17 NC
32675 GSVC 16-Gold 1390 1-4 20% 16 NH
32676 NC 12-2 1390 1-5 13% 12 ND
32677 Monti Club JO 11-2 1390 1-7 13% 11 MN
32678 Jimtown 10-Jimtownvolleygirls 1390 0-3 0% 10 IN
32679 Boston United 16-Sky 1390 0-3 0% 16 MA
32680 Mets 16-Andy 1390 0-11 0% 16 PR
32681 TMB 13-S 1390 0-4 0% 13 MN
32682 FUNdamentals Mytics 17 1390 0-3 0% 17 CO
32683 ESO 12-2 1390 0-4 0% 12 OH
32684 SWMVB 10 1390 0-3 0% 10 MT
32685 Mojo 13 1390 0-3 0% 13 TX
32686 Aim High 17 Aim High Liz (MI) 1390 19-28 40% 17
32687 VL 15-Kali 1390 10-16 38% 15
32688 Island Breeze Taika 15 1390 2-5 29% 15
32689 SVA 15 Warriors 1390 31-23 57% 15 AZ
32690 GENX 18-1 1390 5-4 56% 18 FL
32691 Vail VBC 13-Black 1390 18-15 55% 13 CO
32692 Blacktooth Volleyball Club 14-White 1390 18-15 55% 14 WY
32693 The Shore 16-Black 1390 34-31 52% 16 MI
32694 York Replay 13 York Replay 1390 6-6 50% 13 NE
32695 MN North 14-2 gray 1390 24-25 49% 14 MN
32696 WPVC 17-Armour white 1390 35-36 49% 17 FL
32697 Next Gen 16-Black 1390 39-40 49% 16 MO
32698 Coqui Pop 13 1390 7-8 47% 13 AL
32699 NUF 15-Black 1390 21-24 47% 15 IN
32700 Dakine 17-Regional pink 1390 19-22 46% 17 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.