Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 653 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32601 TEAM Kiwi 13-Columbia 1391 24-26 48% 13 FL
32602 SPARK 15-1 1391 8-9 47% 15 OK
32603 Reef Volleyball Club 16-Regional 1391 15-17 47% 16 CA
32604 Next Level 18-Rhonda 1391 7-8 47% 18 MI
32605 Notorious 18-Jose 1391 7-8 47% 18 CA
32606 MVA 13-Blue 1391 13-15 46% 13 MI
32607 Diablos 12-S 1391 13-16 45% 12 AZ
32608 M2 Volleyball 14-R1 1391 11-14 44% 14 GA
32609 NVA 16-Premier ricardo 1391 20-25 44% 16 FL
32610 PSVBC 16-Diamond 1391 8-10 44% 16 WV
32611 UNION 10-In white 1391 20-25 44% 10 IN
32612 GVJ 17-Ana & stevie 1391 8-10 44% 17 AZ
32613 G3 12-National ashley 1391 23-31 43% 12 MO
32614 TW Skyline 15-Silver 1391 9-12 43% 15 TX
32615 RockCity 15 A4 1391 6-8 43% 15 OH
32616 Platform 18-Adidas 1391 17-23 43% 18 IA
32617 IVC 16-Crush 1390 2-6 25% 16 AK
32618 Balance 17-Black 1390 31-43 42% 17 IL
32619 CKVC 12 1390 8-11 42% 12 IN
32620 Magic 13 Apex 1390 14-20 41% 13 TX
32621 WBLVC 13-2 1390 15-21 41% 13 MN
32622 VEVA Brave 17-Orange 1390 51-74 41% 17 PA
32623 Elite 15-Premier - deana 1390 9-13 41% 15 MO
32624 Eureka Sting 12 Eureka Sting Green 1390 4-6 40% 12 IL
32625 Tamales Volleyball Club G14-2 1390 2-2 40% 14 MO
32626 SCVC L 12-3 1390 4-6 40% 12 TN
32627 Cleveland Elite 17-Grella 1390 11-17 39% 17 OH
32628 Goldfish 15-Teal 1390 9-14 39% 15 CO
32629 LIBERO 10-Huskies 1390 3-5 38% 10 VA
32630 NCVBC 14-1 - cole 1390 5-8 38% 14 CA
32631 True to Form Athletics 18 TTF ELITE 1390 13-21 38% 18 NY
32632 Club 801 13-Club zane 1390 11-12 38% 13 UT
32633 Vienna Elite 16 Travel 1390 26-42 38% 16 VA
32634 Koru VB 14-1 1390 7-10 37% 14 MS
32635 Boss CLE 12-2 1390 18-31 37% 12 OH
32636 SoDak Juniors 16 Windom 1390 18-31 37% 16 MN
32637 TVCG 13-1s 1390 8-14 36% 13 IN
32638 FTL 14-Nuclear janelle 1390 12-21 36% 14 FL
32639 Valley 16 1390 5-9 36% 16 OR
32640 OMNI Volleyball Club 12 OMNI Orange (NC) 1390 7-13 35% 12 CA
32641 RWYVA 15 1390 6-11 35% 15 MN
32642 Surfside Volleyball Club 13-Mb jenny 1390 12-22 35% 13 CA
32643 TX Legends 16-Blue 1390 6-8 35% 16 TX
32644 SF Elite 11 Lynn 1390 14-27 34% 11 CA
32645 SF Juniors 14-White 1390 11-21 34% 14 CA
32646 Surfside Volleyball Club 12-Mb legends 1390 15-29 34% 12 CA
32647 Academy North 15-Hp-2 1390 28-56 33% 15 CA
32648 H2 13-Longhorns _ courtney and caitlyn 1390 15-29 33% 13 MO
32649 SCVC L 12-4 huntre & addi 1390 3-6 33% 12 TN
32650 Whiteout 14-Purple 1390 2-4 33% 14 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.