Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 652 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32551 Boiler Jrs 12-M iron 1391 6-11 35% 12 IN
32552 EC Power KOP 13-Black 1391 13-24 35% 13 PA
32553 Idaho LUV 13-Holly/riley 1391 7-10 35% 13 ID
32554 Sky High Adidas 14-White 1391 17-32 35% 14 IL
32555 MDJRS 15-Open yellow 1391 16-26 36% 15 MD
32556 Outsiders 14 Outsiders 1391 5-9 36% 14 VA
32557 JJVA Club 15-A 1391 9-16 36% 15 FL
32558 Mt. Hood 14-2 meadows 1391 17-29 37% 14 OR
32559 CTX Juniors 11-Mizuno 1391 11-19 37% 11 TX
32560 CHAVC 16-Purple 1391 20-34 37% 16 NC
32561 ENCORE 13-Premier navy 1391 3-5 38% 13 CA
32562 ATHENA VB 15-6 white regional 1391 17-28 38% 15 OR
32563 Vaqueras 15-F luis 1391 5-8 38% 15 PR
32564 La Jolla 15-2 allison 1391 13-21 38% 15 CA
32565 Academy 14-R inferno 1391 17-28 38% 14 IN
32566 Conquerors 13 1391 6-9 38% 13 FL
32567 Manhattan Mayhem 16-3 1391 3-5 38% 16 KS
32568 Wisconsin Ice 13-Purple 1391 11-17 39% 13 WI
32569 TORCH 12-Ameera 1391 12-19 39% 12 CA
32570 Lady Raiders 14-Maroon 1391 9-14 39% 14 IL
32571 LRJ 11-Regional 1391 11-16 39% 11 AR
32572 PEVC 13-Sally 1391 11-17 39% 13 SC
32573 Cleveland Chaos 17U 1391 10-13 40% 17 NC
32574 EVA 17-1 1391 6-9 40% 17 CO
32575 Dynamite 13-Club 1391 8-12 40% 13 TN
32576 Tstreet IE 15-Shell 1391 14-21 40% 15 CA
32577 Liberty 14-Red 1391 17-19 40% 14 TX
32578 Wisconsin Elite 18-Debbie 1391 25-37 40% 18 WI
32579 Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 16 16-Jones/Price 1391 22-33 40% 16 OH
32580 Rev 14-Sil (GL) 1391 2-3 40% 14 IL
32581 Windom Zeds 12-2 maras 1391 2-3 40% 12 SD
32582 Village Juniors 17-S 1391 6-9 40% 17 AR
32583 Elevate 14-Party peacocks 1391 14-21 40% 14 WI
32584 516 Elite 16-Ruby 1391 14-20 41% 16 NY
32585 Fearless Elite 14-3 1391 16-23 41% 14 AR
32586 RVC 15-Relentless 1391 26-37 41% 15 CO
32587 UPTEMPO 16-Crystal 1391 7-10 41% 16 CA
32588 MN Attack 15-2 1391 8-11 42% 15 MN
32589 Topeka Fury Volleyball Club 13-2 1391 5-6 42% 13 KS
32590 MUSVB 14-Black 1391 9-13 38% 14
32591 TeamD 15-Liberty 1391 13-9 59% 15 MI
32592 VIBE 11-White state 1391 13-10 57% 11 FL
32593 Infinity 13 Regional 1391 18-15 55% 13 CO
32594 Legacy 16-Cristian 1391 37-30 55% 16 SC
32595 Aftershock 14-Jazmyn 1391 14-12 52% 14 CA
32596 AVB Fire 14-2 1391 5-5 50% 14 MN
32597 Flying Fish 11 1391 8-8 50% 11 FL
32598 GVJ 16-Rylee & nayomi 1391 10-10 50% 16 AZ
32599 Desert Stars 14 1391 6-6 50% 14 NM
32600 Webfoot 14-Force 1391 20-21 49% 14 OR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.