2025-2026 Season — Page 652 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32551 | Boiler Jrs 12-M iron | 1391 | 6-11 | 35% | 12 | IN |
| 32552 | EC Power KOP 13-Black | 1391 | 13-24 | 35% | 13 | PA |
| 32553 | Idaho LUV 13-Holly/riley | 1391 | 7-10 | 35% | 13 | ID |
| 32554 | Sky High Adidas 14-White | 1391 | 17-32 | 35% | 14 | IL |
| 32555 | MDJRS 15-Open yellow | 1391 | 16-26 | 36% | 15 | MD |
| 32556 | Outsiders 14 Outsiders | 1391 | 5-9 | 36% | 14 | VA |
| 32557 | JJVA Club 15-A | 1391 | 9-16 | 36% | 15 | FL |
| 32558 | Mt. Hood 14-2 meadows | 1391 | 17-29 | 37% | 14 | OR |
| 32559 | CTX Juniors 11-Mizuno | 1391 | 11-19 | 37% | 11 | TX |
| 32560 | CHAVC 16-Purple | 1391 | 20-34 | 37% | 16 | NC |
| 32561 | ENCORE 13-Premier navy | 1391 | 3-5 | 38% | 13 | CA |
| 32562 | ATHENA VB 15-6 white regional | 1391 | 17-28 | 38% | 15 | OR |
| 32563 | Vaqueras 15-F luis | 1391 | 5-8 | 38% | 15 | PR |
| 32564 | La Jolla 15-2 allison | 1391 | 13-21 | 38% | 15 | CA |
| 32565 | Academy 14-R inferno | 1391 | 17-28 | 38% | 14 | IN |
| 32566 | Conquerors 13 | 1391 | 6-9 | 38% | 13 | FL |
| 32567 | Manhattan Mayhem 16-3 | 1391 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | KS |
| 32568 | Wisconsin Ice 13-Purple | 1391 | 11-17 | 39% | 13 | WI |
| 32569 | TORCH 12-Ameera | 1391 | 12-19 | 39% | 12 | CA |
| 32570 | Lady Raiders 14-Maroon | 1391 | 9-14 | 39% | 14 | IL |
| 32571 | LRJ 11-Regional | 1391 | 11-16 | 39% | 11 | AR |
| 32572 | PEVC 13-Sally | 1391 | 11-17 | 39% | 13 | SC |
| 32573 | Cleveland Chaos 17U | 1391 | 10-13 | 40% | 17 | NC |
| 32574 | EVA 17-1 | 1391 | 6-9 | 40% | 17 | CO |
| 32575 | Dynamite 13-Club | 1391 | 8-12 | 40% | 13 | TN |
| 32576 | Tstreet IE 15-Shell | 1391 | 14-21 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 32577 | Liberty 14-Red | 1391 | 17-19 | 40% | 14 | TX |
| 32578 | Wisconsin Elite 18-Debbie | 1391 | 25-37 | 40% | 18 | WI |
| 32579 | Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 16 16-Jones/Price | 1391 | 22-33 | 40% | 16 | OH |
| 32580 | Rev 14-Sil (GL) | 1391 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | IL |
| 32581 | Windom Zeds 12-2 maras | 1391 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | SD |
| 32582 | Village Juniors 17-S | 1391 | 6-9 | 40% | 17 | AR |
| 32583 | Elevate 14-Party peacocks | 1391 | 14-21 | 40% | 14 | WI |
| 32584 | 516 Elite 16-Ruby | 1391 | 14-20 | 41% | 16 | NY |
| 32585 | Fearless Elite 14-3 | 1391 | 16-23 | 41% | 14 | AR |
| 32586 | RVC 15-Relentless | 1391 | 26-37 | 41% | 15 | CO |
| 32587 | UPTEMPO 16-Crystal | 1391 | 7-10 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 32588 | MN Attack 15-2 | 1391 | 8-11 | 42% | 15 | MN |
| 32589 | Topeka Fury Volleyball Club 13-2 | 1391 | 5-6 | 42% | 13 | KS |
| 32590 | MUSVB 14-Black | 1391 | 9-13 | 38% | 14 | |
| 32591 | TeamD 15-Liberty | 1391 | 13-9 | 59% | 15 | MI |
| 32592 | VIBE 11-White state | 1391 | 13-10 | 57% | 11 | FL |
| 32593 | Infinity 13 Regional | 1391 | 18-15 | 55% | 13 | CO |
| 32594 | Legacy 16-Cristian | 1391 | 37-30 | 55% | 16 | SC |
| 32595 | Aftershock 14-Jazmyn | 1391 | 14-12 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 32596 | AVB Fire 14-2 | 1391 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 32597 | Flying Fish 11 | 1391 | 8-8 | 50% | 11 | FL |
| 32598 | GVJ 16-Rylee & nayomi | 1391 | 10-10 | 50% | 16 | AZ |
| 32599 | Desert Stars 14 | 1391 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | NM |
| 32600 | Webfoot 14-Force | 1391 | 20-21 | 49% | 14 | OR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.