Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 659 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32901 Lady Rebels 18-1 1388 0-3 0% 18 NC
32902 PV SPARTANS 12 1388 0-3 0% 12 IA
32903 Potlatch Timber Volleyball Club 14-Green 1388 0-3 0% 14 WA
32904 Rogue 14-Violet 1388 0-3 0% 14 OH
32905 Cpac 17-Black 1388 0-4 0% 17 SD
32906 Wentzville Heat 10-Orange 1388 0-4 0% 10 MO
32907 MAC 15 1388 0-3 0% 15 MA
32908 Club 1 SS 15 1388 0-3 0% 15 IL
32909 HW 16-Black 1388 0-5 0% 16 NJ
32910 CSVC 13-3 1388 0-3 0% 13 IN
32911 Tstreet 13-Melane 1388 0-5 0% 13 CA
32912 Club Phoenix Volleyball G14-1 1388 4-2 57% 14 OH
32913 Belles 13-1 blue 1387 7-13 32% 13 PA
32914 Tsunami 14-2a 1387 15-10 60% 14 GA
32915 MT. MORRIS 15-1 1387 5-5 50% 15 MI
32916 Pratt Impact VBC 15-1 1387 9-7 50% 15 KS
32917 Force 16-Adidas sel bl1 1387 20-19 51% 16 MI
32918 Desert Sports 16 Elite 1387 14-13 52% 16 CA
32919 A-Town Volley 16-Red 1387 0-3 0% 16 AR
32920 South 10-White 1387 0-3 0% 10 TX
32921 Texas Coastal 13-Navy 1387 0-3 0% 13 TX
32922 Sideout VA 12 1387 0-4 0% 12 NV
32923 DFW Elite 12-Blue 1387 0-3 0% 12 TX
32924 Mineral Area 11-Force 1387 0-3 0% 11 MO
32925 HP Illinois 14-Emerald 1387 0-3 0% 14 MO
32926 Sideout VBC 16-2 1387 1-7 13% 16 WA
32927 NWVBC 16-1 1387 2-10 17% 16 WI
32928 Montana Club 14-1 1387 8-26 19% 14 MT
32929 Lomanview 12-Valerie 1387 1-4 20% 12 PR
32930 319 United 12-Dan 1387 2-7 20% 12 IA
32931 Legacy KY 17-Pink 1387 1-4 20% 17 KY
32932 Wrecking Crew 12-3 1387 1-4 20% 12 TX
32933 K1 Volley 15-Elvin 1387 1-4 20% 15 PR
32934 Woodburn 14-Black 1387 3-8 23% 14 OR
32935 Jellys 13-Ext 1387 1-3 25% 13 FL
32936 Phoenix Force 16 1387 1-3 25% 16 NY
32937 Moorhead Juniors 14-3 1387 4-8 25% 14 ND
32938 Lincoln 17-1 1387 1-3 25% 17 IN
32939 NYC Juniors 16-Bk 1387 5-13 28% 16 NY
32940 208VBC 16-Spokane blue 1387 2-5 29% 16 ID
32941 Burns Volleyball Club 12 Burns VBC (CE) (8) 1387 2-5 29% 12 OR
32942 DENVER JUNIORS VC 17-Caitlin 1387 9-22 29% 17 CO
32943 Oak Creek 13 Oak Creek 1387 6-15 29% 13 AZ
32944 Dynamite 14-Girls 1387 2-5 29% 14 MI
32945 AZ REV 14-Green 1387 16-39 29% 14 AZ
32946 CVVC 17-2 1387 8-19 30% 17 UT
32947 FWFIRE 16-2w 1387 6-10 30% 16 TX
32948 LAVA North 14-Elite 1387 8-19 30% 14 CA
32949 Alpha 16-2 1387 19-42 31% 16 KY
32950 1W 17-Red 1387 4-9 31% 17 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.