2025-2026 Season — Page 659 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32901 | Lady Rebels 18-1 | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 18 | NC |
| 32902 | PV SPARTANS 12 | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | IA |
| 32903 | Potlatch Timber Volleyball Club 14-Green | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | WA |
| 32904 | Rogue 14-Violet | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | OH |
| 32905 | Cpac 17-Black | 1388 | 0-4 | 0% | 17 | SD |
| 32906 | Wentzville Heat 10-Orange | 1388 | 0-4 | 0% | 10 | MO |
| 32907 | MAC 15 | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | MA |
| 32908 | Club 1 SS 15 | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | IL |
| 32909 | HW 16-Black | 1388 | 0-5 | 0% | 16 | NJ |
| 32910 | CSVC 13-3 | 1388 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | IN |
| 32911 | Tstreet 13-Melane | 1388 | 0-5 | 0% | 13 | CA |
| 32912 | Club Phoenix Volleyball G14-1 | 1388 | 4-2 | 57% | 14 | OH |
| 32913 | Belles 13-1 blue | 1387 | 7-13 | 32% | 13 | PA |
| 32914 | Tsunami 14-2a | 1387 | 15-10 | 60% | 14 | GA |
| 32915 | MT. MORRIS 15-1 | 1387 | 5-5 | 50% | 15 | MI |
| 32916 | Pratt Impact VBC 15-1 | 1387 | 9-7 | 50% | 15 | KS |
| 32917 | Force 16-Adidas sel bl1 | 1387 | 20-19 | 51% | 16 | MI |
| 32918 | Desert Sports 16 Elite | 1387 | 14-13 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 32919 | A-Town Volley 16-Red | 1387 | 0-3 | 0% | 16 | AR |
| 32920 | South 10-White | 1387 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | TX |
| 32921 | Texas Coastal 13-Navy | 1387 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | TX |
| 32922 | Sideout VA 12 | 1387 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | NV |
| 32923 | DFW Elite 12-Blue | 1387 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 32924 | Mineral Area 11-Force | 1387 | 0-3 | 0% | 11 | MO |
| 32925 | HP Illinois 14-Emerald | 1387 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | MO |
| 32926 | Sideout VBC 16-2 | 1387 | 1-7 | 13% | 16 | WA |
| 32927 | NWVBC 16-1 | 1387 | 2-10 | 17% | 16 | WI |
| 32928 | Montana Club 14-1 | 1387 | 8-26 | 19% | 14 | MT |
| 32929 | Lomanview 12-Valerie | 1387 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | PR |
| 32930 | 319 United 12-Dan | 1387 | 2-7 | 20% | 12 | IA |
| 32931 | Legacy KY 17-Pink | 1387 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | KY |
| 32932 | Wrecking Crew 12-3 | 1387 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | TX |
| 32933 | K1 Volley 15-Elvin | 1387 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | PR |
| 32934 | Woodburn 14-Black | 1387 | 3-8 | 23% | 14 | OR |
| 32935 | Jellys 13-Ext | 1387 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | FL |
| 32936 | Phoenix Force 16 | 1387 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | NY |
| 32937 | Moorhead Juniors 14-3 | 1387 | 4-8 | 25% | 14 | ND |
| 32938 | Lincoln 17-1 | 1387 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | IN |
| 32939 | NYC Juniors 16-Bk | 1387 | 5-13 | 28% | 16 | NY |
| 32940 | 208VBC 16-Spokane blue | 1387 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | ID |
| 32941 | Burns Volleyball Club 12 Burns VBC (CE) (8) | 1387 | 2-5 | 29% | 12 | OR |
| 32942 | DENVER JUNIORS VC 17-Caitlin | 1387 | 9-22 | 29% | 17 | CO |
| 32943 | Oak Creek 13 Oak Creek | 1387 | 6-15 | 29% | 13 | AZ |
| 32944 | Dynamite 14-Girls | 1387 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | MI |
| 32945 | AZ REV 14-Green | 1387 | 16-39 | 29% | 14 | AZ |
| 32946 | CVVC 17-2 | 1387 | 8-19 | 30% | 17 | UT |
| 32947 | FWFIRE 16-2w | 1387 | 6-10 | 30% | 16 | TX |
| 32948 | LAVA North 14-Elite | 1387 | 8-19 | 30% | 14 | CA |
| 32949 | Alpha 16-2 | 1387 | 19-42 | 31% | 16 | KY |
| 32950 | 1W 17-Red | 1387 | 4-9 | 31% | 17 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.