2025-2026 Season — Page 647 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32301 | VoltageVB 15-Blue | 1394 | 6-7 | 46% | 15 | FL |
| 32302 | Club Koa 16-Blue | 1393 | 18-20 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 32303 | OPVBC 15 Voltage | 1393 | 25-22 | 53% | 15 | WA |
| 32304 | MOVA UA 11-Black | 1393 | 14-17 | 44% | 11 | MO |
| 32305 | Mid-Michigan ACES 15 Maddie | 1393 | 5-10 | 33% | 15 | MI |
| 32306 | VAVA 15-1 | 1393 | 2-11 | 15% | 15 | VA |
| 32307 | Lineshot Volleyball Club 17 17 Purple American Plus | 1393 | 2-7 | 22% | 17 | OH |
| 32308 | Metrowest VBC 15-Red | 1393 | 7-9 | 30% | 15 | MA |
| 32309 | LBK 14-4 | 1393 | 6-11 | 35% | 14 | OH |
| 32310 | Preds 14-Girls ignite | 1393 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | OH |
| 32311 | Outbreak 14-Black | 1393 | 18-22 | 45% | 14 | VA |
| 32312 | XP 13-Spring red | 1393 | 0-2 | 0% | 13 | IL |
| 32313 | Moffat County Aces 13 Moffat County Aces | 1393 | 2-8 | 20% | 13 | CO |
| 32314 | EDVC 14-Travel team c | 1393 | 11-12 | 48% | 14 | NC |
| 32315 | Rally Point 12 | 1393 | 14-23 | 38% | 12 | HI |
| 32316 | SSWolfpack 13-Thetas | 1393 | 6-12 | 32% | 13 | MA |
| 32317 | STVA 13-White | 1393 | 16-19 | 44% | 13 | TX |
| 32318 | TAV Houston 13-Silver | 1393 | 13-14 | 46% | 13 | TX |
| 32319 | Rose City 14-3 | 1393 | 1-2 | 20% | 14 | MT |
| 32320 | TVV 18-1 | 1393 | 16-26 | 38% | 18 | TN |
| 32321 | Emerald Force 18 | 1393 | 9-17 | 35% | 18 | TN |
| 32322 | A5 West 15-4 | 1393 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | GA |
| 32323 | Aggression 15-2 premier | 1393 | 3-3 | 50% | 15 | IL |
| 32324 | IVC 18U | 1393 | 7-9 | 37% | 18 | ND |
| 32325 | Rise Elite VC 14-Enijah | 1393 | 23-20 | 53% | 14 | FL |
| 32326 | Jax Skyline 14-Silver | 1393 | 28-33 | 46% | 14 | FL |
| 32327 | IEV 14-U orange | 1393 | 9-24 | 27% | 14 | FL |
| 32328 | Jammers 14-Red | 1393 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | NC |
| 32329 | Crossfire 15-Black | 1393 | 21-32 | 40% | 15 | MN |
| 32330 | MN Premier 16-blue | 1393 | 12-14 | 46% | 16 | MN |
| 32331 | 3CVBC 18 Premier | 1393 | 25-22 | 53% | 18 | TX |
| 32332 | NEA Tomahawks 15-Pink | 1393 | 11-23 | 32% | 15 | TN |
| 32333 | C-Force VBC 15-Black | 1393 | 24-23 | 51% | 15 | TN |
| 32334 | Impact 13-Ellie | 1393 | 5-5 | 50% | 13 | MI |
| 32335 | Boston United 12-Select | 1393 | 7-12 | 37% | 12 | MA |
| 32336 | SDVBC 15-AJ | 1393 | 18-28 | 39% | 15 | CA |
| 32337 | Academy West 17-Hp-1 | 1393 | 13-39 | 25% | 17 | CA |
| 32338 | PVA 14-Yellow | 1393 | 11-13 | 46% | 14 | SC |
| 32339 | Five Star 16-Pink | 1393 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | CO |
| 32340 | BVA 15 | 1393 | 15-24 | 34% | 15 | NY |
| 32341 | Set Above Volleyball Academy 15 SAVA Fireball | 1393 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | NY |
| 32342 | Athena 12-Black | 1393 | 12-21 | 36% | 12 | CA |
| 32343 | Frenchtown 17 | 1393 | 3-6 | 27% | 17 | |
| 32344 | KCE Supreme G17-1 | 1393 | 4-2 | 57% | 17 | |
| 32345 | LAVA 15 | 1393 | 15-25 | 38% | 15 | KY |
| 32346 | EAA 15-Black | 1393 | 9-15 | 38% | 15 | KY |
| 32347 | IVC 15-National mindy | 1393 | 5-8 | 36% | 15 | TX |
| 32348 | TN Heat 14-Tesa | 1393 | 7-6 | 39% | 14 | TN |
| 32349 | Panther 15-3 | 1393 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | CO |
| 32350 | Emerge Volleyball Club 14 Emerge -BLACK | 1393 | 10-17 | 37% | 14 | LA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.