Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 647 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32301 VoltageVB 15-Blue 1394 6-7 46% 15 FL
32302 Club Koa 16-Blue 1393 18-20 47% 16 CA
32303 OPVBC 15 Voltage 1393 25-22 53% 15 WA
32304 MOVA UA 11-Black 1393 14-17 44% 11 MO
32305 Mid-Michigan ACES 15 Maddie 1393 5-10 33% 15 MI
32306 VAVA 15-1 1393 2-11 15% 15 VA
32307 Lineshot Volleyball Club 17 17 Purple American Plus 1393 2-7 22% 17 OH
32308 Metrowest VBC 15-Red 1393 7-9 30% 15 MA
32309 LBK 14-4 1393 6-11 35% 14 OH
32310 Preds 14-Girls ignite 1393 1-4 20% 14 OH
32311 Outbreak 14-Black 1393 18-22 45% 14 VA
32312 XP 13-Spring red 1393 0-2 0% 13 IL
32313 Moffat County Aces 13 Moffat County Aces 1393 2-8 20% 13 CO
32314 EDVC 14-Travel team c 1393 11-12 48% 14 NC
32315 Rally Point 12 1393 14-23 38% 12 HI
32316 SSWolfpack 13-Thetas 1393 6-12 32% 13 MA
32317 STVA 13-White 1393 16-19 44% 13 TX
32318 TAV Houston 13-Silver 1393 13-14 46% 13 TX
32319 Rose City 14-3 1393 1-2 20% 14 MT
32320 TVV 18-1 1393 16-26 38% 18 TN
32321 Emerald Force 18 1393 9-17 35% 18 TN
32322 A5 West 15-4 1393 2-3 40% 15 GA
32323 Aggression 15-2 premier 1393 3-3 50% 15 IL
32324 IVC 18U 1393 7-9 37% 18 ND
32325 Rise Elite VC 14-Enijah 1393 23-20 53% 14 FL
32326 Jax Skyline 14-Silver 1393 28-33 46% 14 FL
32327 IEV 14-U orange 1393 9-24 27% 14 FL
32328 Jammers 14-Red 1393 1-4 20% 14 NC
32329 Crossfire 15-Black 1393 21-32 40% 15 MN
32330 MN Premier 16-blue 1393 12-14 46% 16 MN
32331 3CVBC 18 Premier 1393 25-22 53% 18 TX
32332 NEA Tomahawks 15-Pink 1393 11-23 32% 15 TN
32333 C-Force VBC 15-Black 1393 24-23 51% 15 TN
32334 Impact 13-Ellie 1393 5-5 50% 13 MI
32335 Boston United 12-Select 1393 7-12 37% 12 MA
32336 SDVBC 15-AJ 1393 18-28 39% 15 CA
32337 Academy West 17-Hp-1 1393 13-39 25% 17 CA
32338 PVA 14-Yellow 1393 11-13 46% 14 SC
32339 Five Star 16-Pink 1393 18-26 41% 16 CO
32340 BVA 15 1393 15-24 34% 15 NY
32341 Set Above Volleyball Academy 15 SAVA Fireball 1393 2-3 40% 15 NY
32342 Athena 12-Black 1393 12-21 36% 12 CA
32343 Frenchtown 17 1393 3-6 27% 17
32344 KCE Supreme G17-1 1393 4-2 57% 17
32345 LAVA 15 1393 15-25 38% 15 KY
32346 EAA 15-Black 1393 9-15 38% 15 KY
32347 IVC 15-National mindy 1393 5-8 36% 15 TX
32348 TN Heat 14-Tesa 1393 7-6 39% 14 TN
32349 Panther 15-3 1393 4-5 44% 15 CO
32350 Emerge Volleyball Club 14 Emerge -BLACK 1393 10-17 37% 14 LA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.