Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 646 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32251 S STORM 13 1394 0-3 0% 13 MI
32252 AVC CLE 11-White 1394 10-27 27% 11 OH
32253 BYVA 12-1 1394 3-8 25% 12 MN
32254 Junior Mints 10-White 1394 3-6 23% 10 TX
32255 1915 Excel VC 18-1 1394 8-7 53% 18 FL
32256 NHVB Youth-Purple 12 White 1394 2-4 33% 12 MN
32257 MVP 14 Silver 1394 19-44 30% 14 WI
32258 WSRVC 12-Williams 1394 14-10 58% 12 WY
32259 Panther 10-Turquoise 1394 6-8 38% 10 CO
32260 316VBC 15-1 1394 4-6 40% 15 KS
32261 MCV 14 14 1394 8-10 44% 14 NY
32262 WVBA 14-State purple 1394 4-5 44% 14 FL
32263 575 Volleyball 14 575 WSL Kathryn 1394 2-3 40% 14 GA
32264 EJVBC 14-Ohana 1394 22-19 54% 14 WA
32265 CVC 13-Green 1394 14-24 32% 13 ND
32266 SLPVC 17-1 1394 25-28 47% 17 IN
32267 EVL 13-1 1394 2-5 29% 13 CA
32268 Apex NW 13-Summit 1394 18-20 47% 13 WA
32269 OFVA Bulldogs 10-S 1394 0-4 0% 10 OH
32270 Legacy 13-Regional 1394 5-8 38% 13 NY
32271 Maine Jrs 16-Navy 1394 7-12 32% 16 ME
32272 ACE 15-1 1394 17-24 41% 15 TN
32273 IVBA SOAR 16-Black 1394 11-14 44% 16 MS
32274 PAC 12-Astro 1394 14-10 56% 12 TX
32275 Hype VB 15-Howard 1394 5-9 23% 15 MS
32276 Starlings S-N-P 14-Coach alondra 1394 4-9 31% 14 CA
32277 PCVBC 13-Combs 1394 8-11 42% 13 OH
32278 MVC Panthers 10-Black 1394 0-3 0% 10 IL
32279 SSWolfpack 14-Direwolves 1394 10-16 36% 14 MA
32280 Piedmont VBC 16-Swoosh 1394 27-32 46% 16 NC
32281 RCVC 14-2 1394 9-11 41% 14 AL
32282 MN Select 14-Black 1394 34-34 50% 14 MN
32283 Northern Heat 14-3 1394 11-9 55% 14 MN
32284 ONE Volleyball 13-3 1394 27-26 51% 13 GA
32285 Five:1 16-Blue 1394 17-28 38% 16 MI
32286 Kingdom KC Volleyball Club 17-1 1394 7-8 41% 17 MO
32287 MW Shock 12-Diamond 1394 14-15 48% 12 MO
32288 Falcon Fire 10-1 1394 3-9 23% 10 MN
32289 Elite 14 Premier 1394 10-13 43% 14 MO
32290 Hot Shots 17 1394 9-15 33% 17 NY
32291 NW Elite 18-2 black 1394 16-22 42% 18 OR
32292 GSJ West 14 Regional 1394 14-21 40% 14 SC
32293 Magnitude VBC 14-2 1394 4-4 50% 14 AZ
32294 Premier Volleyball 15 Premier Ultra 1394 1-4 20% 15 DE
32295 Sicangu 15-Black 1394 1-4 20% 15 SD
32296 Wrecking Crew 11-1 1394 0-4 0% 11 TX
32297 Indianola 17-Black 1394 2-6 22% 17 IA
32298 NIL - Ha'aheo 10-S 1394 0-3 0% 10 WA
32299 Apex VBTC 16-Summit red 1394 1-3 25% 16 OH
32300 Aspire 13-Black 1394 9-26 26% 13 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.