2025-2026 Season — Page 646 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32251 | S STORM 13 | 1394 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | MI |
| 32252 | AVC CLE 11-White | 1394 | 10-27 | 27% | 11 | OH |
| 32253 | BYVA 12-1 | 1394 | 3-8 | 25% | 12 | MN |
| 32254 | Junior Mints 10-White | 1394 | 3-6 | 23% | 10 | TX |
| 32255 | 1915 Excel VC 18-1 | 1394 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | FL |
| 32256 | NHVB Youth-Purple 12 White | 1394 | 2-4 | 33% | 12 | MN |
| 32257 | MVP 14 Silver | 1394 | 19-44 | 30% | 14 | WI |
| 32258 | WSRVC 12-Williams | 1394 | 14-10 | 58% | 12 | WY |
| 32259 | Panther 10-Turquoise | 1394 | 6-8 | 38% | 10 | CO |
| 32260 | 316VBC 15-1 | 1394 | 4-6 | 40% | 15 | KS |
| 32261 | MCV 14 14 | 1394 | 8-10 | 44% | 14 | NY |
| 32262 | WVBA 14-State purple | 1394 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | FL |
| 32263 | 575 Volleyball 14 575 WSL Kathryn | 1394 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | GA |
| 32264 | EJVBC 14-Ohana | 1394 | 22-19 | 54% | 14 | WA |
| 32265 | CVC 13-Green | 1394 | 14-24 | 32% | 13 | ND |
| 32266 | SLPVC 17-1 | 1394 | 25-28 | 47% | 17 | IN |
| 32267 | EVL 13-1 | 1394 | 2-5 | 29% | 13 | CA |
| 32268 | Apex NW 13-Summit | 1394 | 18-20 | 47% | 13 | WA |
| 32269 | OFVA Bulldogs 10-S | 1394 | 0-4 | 0% | 10 | OH |
| 32270 | Legacy 13-Regional | 1394 | 5-8 | 38% | 13 | NY |
| 32271 | Maine Jrs 16-Navy | 1394 | 7-12 | 32% | 16 | ME |
| 32272 | ACE 15-1 | 1394 | 17-24 | 41% | 15 | TN |
| 32273 | IVBA SOAR 16-Black | 1394 | 11-14 | 44% | 16 | MS |
| 32274 | PAC 12-Astro | 1394 | 14-10 | 56% | 12 | TX |
| 32275 | Hype VB 15-Howard | 1394 | 5-9 | 23% | 15 | MS |
| 32276 | Starlings S-N-P 14-Coach alondra | 1394 | 4-9 | 31% | 14 | CA |
| 32277 | PCVBC 13-Combs | 1394 | 8-11 | 42% | 13 | OH |
| 32278 | MVC Panthers 10-Black | 1394 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | IL |
| 32279 | SSWolfpack 14-Direwolves | 1394 | 10-16 | 36% | 14 | MA |
| 32280 | Piedmont VBC 16-Swoosh | 1394 | 27-32 | 46% | 16 | NC |
| 32281 | RCVC 14-2 | 1394 | 9-11 | 41% | 14 | AL |
| 32282 | MN Select 14-Black | 1394 | 34-34 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 32283 | Northern Heat 14-3 | 1394 | 11-9 | 55% | 14 | MN |
| 32284 | ONE Volleyball 13-3 | 1394 | 27-26 | 51% | 13 | GA |
| 32285 | Five:1 16-Blue | 1394 | 17-28 | 38% | 16 | MI |
| 32286 | Kingdom KC Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1394 | 7-8 | 41% | 17 | MO |
| 32287 | MW Shock 12-Diamond | 1394 | 14-15 | 48% | 12 | MO |
| 32288 | Falcon Fire 10-1 | 1394 | 3-9 | 23% | 10 | MN |
| 32289 | Elite 14 Premier | 1394 | 10-13 | 43% | 14 | MO |
| 32290 | Hot Shots 17 | 1394 | 9-15 | 33% | 17 | NY |
| 32291 | NW Elite 18-2 black | 1394 | 16-22 | 42% | 18 | OR |
| 32292 | GSJ West 14 Regional | 1394 | 14-21 | 40% | 14 | SC |
| 32293 | Magnitude VBC 14-2 | 1394 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 32294 | Premier Volleyball 15 Premier Ultra | 1394 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | DE |
| 32295 | Sicangu 15-Black | 1394 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | SD |
| 32296 | Wrecking Crew 11-1 | 1394 | 0-4 | 0% | 11 | TX |
| 32297 | Indianola 17-Black | 1394 | 2-6 | 22% | 17 | IA |
| 32298 | NIL - Ha'aheo 10-S | 1394 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | WA |
| 32299 | Apex VBTC 16-Summit red | 1394 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | OH |
| 32300 | Aspire 13-Black | 1394 | 9-26 | 26% | 13 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.