2025-2026 Season — Page 643 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32101 | SVBC Spirit 18-Navy | 1395 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | IA |
| 32102 | Hype VB 17-Tatum | 1395 | 3-5 | 33% | 17 | MS |
| 32103 | 757 14-J megan/allie | 1395 | 1-5 | 17% | 14 | VA |
| 32104 | PO1NT 17-1 premier | 1395 | 3-5 | 38% | 17 | OH |
| 32105 | OT 12-T jayla | 1395 | 13-19 | 41% | 12 | FL |
| 32106 | DIG 15-Blue | 1395 | 13-27 | 28% | 15 | TX |
| 32107 | Sky High 13-Murawski | 1395 | 5-9 | 36% | 13 | IL |
| 32108 | Diablo VBC 17-2 | 1395 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | NV |
| 32109 | Mission Trails 16-Brian | 1395 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | CA |
| 32110 | Evolution Volleyball Academy 13 13U SS | 1395 | 6-9 | 40% | 13 | IL |
| 32111 | City 11-Blue east - nicole | 1395 | 15-19 | 44% | 11 | CA |
| 32112 | Dig It VBC 14-3 | 1395 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | IL |
| 32113 | Apex 15-Regional girls | 1395 | 13-14 | 48% | 15 | SC |
| 32114 | ECVC 14-Reg sowal - beth | 1395 | 13-18 | 42% | 14 | AL |
| 32115 | Legacy 11-Orange | 1395 | 9-12 | 43% | 11 | MI |
| 32116 | Mission Trails 16-Lucy | 1395 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | CA |
| 32117 | CROI ELITE 15 | 1395 | 14-23 | 38% | 15 | IN |
| 32118 | TX Legends 17-Blue | 1395 | 3-4 | 38% | 17 | TX |
| 32119 | ZUMAZ 14-1 | 1395 | 2-9 | 17% | 14 | MN |
| 32120 | Stars 14-S red | 1395 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | MN |
| 32121 | GSI 13-Teal | 1395 | 12-19 | 39% | 13 | FL |
| 32122 | 575 17-Wsnb troy | 1395 | 27-35 | 44% | 17 | GA |
| 32123 | Club Idaho 14-White | 1395 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | UT |
| 32124 | PVA 10-2 | 1395 | 1-3 | 20% | 10 | MO |
| 32125 | St. Pete 13-Black | 1395 | 26-30 | 46% | 13 | FL |
| 32126 | Dragons 12-Lexi/ alexis | 1395 | 9-12 | 43% | 12 | MA |
| 32127 | Black Canyon 15-Leslie | 1395 | 12-13 | 41% | 15 | CO |
| 32128 | Ichiban 12-Phoenix | 1395 | 15-15 | 45% | 12 | GA |
| 32129 | NE Velocity 16-1 | 1395 | 4-14 | 22% | 16 | MN |
| 32130 | JRBISON 13 | 1395 | 14-15 | 48% | 13 | WY |
| 32131 | Apex Volleyball Academy 18 APEX Neville Pink (OV) | 1395 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | OH |
| 32132 | London Elite 18-Black | 1395 | 9-14 | 39% | 18 | OH |
| 32133 | AP 11-Lite atomic | 1395 | 4-8 | 31% | 11 | TX |
| 32134 | OVA 13-White | 1395 | 19-26 | 42% | 13 | FL |
| 32135 | Newfield 12 | 1395 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | NY |
| 32136 | Apex NW 17-Ascent | 1395 | 3-7 | 30% | 17 | WA |
| 32137 | OWV 15-Purple | 1395 | 21-23 | 48% | 15 | FL |
| 32138 | Athlete HQ 12-Polefko | 1395 | 6-17 | 26% | 12 | OH |
| 32139 | Impact 15-Red | 1395 | 12-13 | 46% | 15 | NY |
| 32140 | W Pride 12-1 | 1395 | 4-7 | 36% | 12 | NY |
| 32141 | Xtreme 16-Regional poppy | 1395 | 16-18 | 47% | 16 | NJ |
| 32142 | Cardinal Club Volleyball 17 | 1395 | 0-3 | 0% | 17 | IA |
| 32143 | NWE 18-2 | 1395 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | WA |
| 32144 | WACO VBC 15-Ua white | 1395 | 15-18 | 41% | 15 | TX |
| 32145 | Shockwave 17-Gold | 1395 | 9-11 | 45% | 17 | KS |
| 32146 | KMS 16-1 | 1395 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | MN |
| 32147 | Phoenix 16-Yellow | 1395 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | OH |
| 32148 | Red Rock 13-Scott - sf | 1395 | 18-28 | 39% | 13 | CA |
| 32149 | CID 15-Black | 1395 | 10-12 | 45% | 15 | ID |
| 32150 | High Elevation Volleyball Club 14 HEVC Meghan | 1395 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | WY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.