Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 642 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32051 ECC 13-South red 1396 4-8 27% 13 NJ
32052 BoCo VAC 13-Red 1396 10-12 45% 13 CO
32053 CinciVB Acad 13-4 1396 10-16 38% 13 OH
32054 Hollywood 16-2 rise 1396 5-12 25% 16 OH
32055 CPU Storm 11 1396 0-3 0% 11 IA
32056 Hype VB 15-Waldrop 1396 5-11 23% 15 MS
32057 Tenacity 14 National 1396 17-28 38% 14 TN
32058 Cajun Coast Athletics 15 1396 4-8 31% 15 LA
32059 FVC 13-Tango 1396 1-4 20% 13 NE
32060 Park City Juniors 14 1396 9-14 36% 14 UT
32061 HIC 16-R jalyn 1396 3-7 23% 16 UT
32062 PVA 14 REGIONAL 1396 7-14 29% 14 PA
32063 Club GSL 13-Elite - brooklyn 1396 12-20 31% 13 UT
32064 ONE Volleyball Academy G16-2 1396 8-10 44% 16 KS
32065 PR Select 17 1396 6-7 46% 17 PR
32066 Aftershock 16-Jimmy/mark 1396 1-4 20% 16 CA
32067 RC3VC 15 1396 1-4 20% 15 TN
32068 Essex 12-1 1396 7-13 35% 12 NJ
32069 SoFLO 15 1396 28-28 50% 15 FL
32070 City Juniors 12-Red 1396 12-16 43% 12 TX
32071 OK Charge 12-West 1396 10-12 38% 12 OK
32072 Downstate 14-White 1396 6-10 38% 14 NY
32073 GCVA 17-Black 1396 17-23 43% 17 TX
32074 RVC 17 Zonal 1396 27-39 41% 17 VA
32075 NOH 10-Red 1396 1-4 20% 10 OH
32076 Mintonette Sports 14-6 1396 17-24 41% 14 OH
32077 BVC 16 Ashley 1396 15-19 44% 16 CA
32078 RVC 13 Royal 1396 17-18 46% 13 IL
32079 Sonshine 15 1396 4-6 40% 15 CO
32080 Avidity 14-Jade 1396 16-20 44% 14 MA
32081 Nestor Starlings 16-Alex 1396 24-25 49% 16 CA
32082 WNY Elite 14 1396 0-4 0% 14 NY
32083 Dead Frog 13-Aubrey 1396 9-7 56% 13 MI
32084 Ridgeland Reds 18-Red 1396 4-5 44% 18 MN
32085 Pacific 15-Red 1396 0-7 0% 15 WA
32086 Club Dive 17-1 1395 9-10 47% 17 MN
32087 Academy 12-Pearl 1395 1-4 20% 12 NC
32088 Forge For Families Volleyball 14 Forge For Families (LS) 1395 0-3 0% 14 TX
32089 Warren Sixpack 14-Local 1395 5-5 50% 14 NJ
32090 Ho'opa 18-1 1395 1-4 20% 18 HI
32091 Velocity 18-Red 1395 9-12 43% 18 MS
32092 Waco Lightning 14-White 1395 7-8 44% 14 TX
32093 PJVBC 13-Select 1395 14-13 52% 13 WA
32094 MiElite 13-Alyssa west 1395 18-22 41% 13 MI
32095 MDJRS 14-Regional 1395 2-5 29% 14 MD
32096 CSF 14-Teal 1395 1-5 17% 14 NC
32097 CE Stars 16-S 1395 20-27 43% 16 IN
32098 Southern Heat 14-Purple 1395 0-4 0% 14 WI
32099 STL Crossfire B 16 R1 1395 22-23 48% 16 MO
32100 Shawano Storm 16 1395 3-10 23% 16 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.