2025-2026 Season — Page 644 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32151 | Mets 17-Issalex | 1395 | 7-8 | 47% | 17 | PR |
| 32152 | Cyclones 16-E chaparrals | 1395 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | IL |
| 32153 | VC United 16-2 premier | 1395 | 4-11 | 27% | 16 | IL |
| 32154 | AJV 12 Toro | 1395 | 18-22 | 45% | 12 | TX |
| 32155 | JEV 13-Black | 1395 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | ID |
| 32156 | DVBC Defiance 15-S - lisa | 1395 | 0-3 | 0% | 15 | CO |
| 32157 | SR 16-1 | 1395 | 13-14 | 48% | 16 | MN |
| 32158 | Volleyball Academy Unlimited 16-1 | 1395 | 10-12 | 37% | 16 | |
| 32159 | Mountain1 16-3 keegan | 1395 | 12-16 | 33% | 16 | MT |
| 32160 | Playeros 15-2 erick | 1395 | 17-19 | 47% | 15 | FL |
| 32161 | Lake Erie Crush 14-Black | 1395 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | |
| 32162 | Chi City Elite 17-2 | 1395 | 12-26 | 32% | 17 | IL |
| 32163 | PL Extreme Volleyball 12-2 | 1395 | 13-16 | 45% | 12 | MN |
| 32164 | Club 1 17 Skronkstrong | 1395 | 21-32 | 40% | 17 | IL |
| 32165 | Raleigh 15 Royal | 1395 | 17-37 | 31% | 15 | NC |
| 32166 | Carolina Pro Perfomance 13 | 1395 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | PR |
| 32167 | MCV 15-1 | 1395 | 12-12 | 50% | 15 | KY |
| 32168 | Vortex 14-Black | 1395 | 15-21 | 42% | 14 | MO |
| 32169 | Independent 10-Ally | 1395 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | IN |
| 32170 | 417 Juniors 13-2 | 1395 | 1-5 | 17% | 13 | MO |
| 32171 | Kokoro Volleyball 12-2 | 1395 | 9-19 | 29% | 12 | MN |
| 32172 | WI Shock 12 | 1395 | 5-8 | 38% | 12 | WI |
| 32173 | Cajun Coast Athletics 17 | 1395 | 6-7 | 46% | 17 | LA |
| 32174 | CRUSH Volleyball Club 11-Blue | 1395 | 11-19 | 37% | 11 | KY |
| 32175 | Windom Zeds 12-3 foy | 1395 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | SD |
| 32176 | NE D-League 14-White | 1395 | 3-5 | 30% | 14 | IA |
| 32177 | Black Swamp 14-3 | 1395 | 6-10 | 38% | 14 | OH |
| 32178 | Hammerin' Hawks 13-2 | 1395 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | IA |
| 32179 | Apex Volleyball Club 15-Gsv | 1395 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | MO |
| 32180 | SOCO Swift 13-Teal | 1395 | 1-5 | 17% | 13 | CO |
| 32181 | EnERgy 13-1 | 1395 | 8-9 | 47% | 13 | MN |
| 32182 | NJVBC 13-Hurricanes | 1395 | 6-7 | 46% | 13 | NJ |
| 32183 | XP 11-2 spring white | 1395 | 0-3 | 0% | 11 | IL |
| 32184 | Galaxy 15-1 | 1395 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | MO |
| 32185 | PVA 15-Gray - ohana | 1395 | 3-11 | 20% | 15 | MO |
| 32186 | Ozark Storm 15-S | 1395 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | MO |
| 32187 | LHVA 14-White regional | 1395 | 9-10 | 47% | 14 | NY |
| 32188 | Ka Ulukoa 14-R joe | 1395 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | HI |
| 32189 | Munciana 13-R bears | 1395 | 7-12 | 37% | 13 | IN |
| 32190 | KVA 12-Shelby | 1395 | 0-3 | 0% | 12 | HI |
| 32191 | Victorium 12-Black | 1395 | 20-20 | 50% | 12 | AZ |
| 32192 | Central Alberta Queens Volleyball Club 15-Ultimate | 1395 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | |
| 32193 | Action 15 | 1395 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | BC |
| 32194 | MVP 13-2 | 1395 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | OH |
| 32195 | Aim High 16 Aim High Curisa | 1395 | 3-7 | 30% | 16 | |
| 32196 | WVC Eagles 15-Girls | 1394 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | |
| 32197 | Eastern Shore Volleyball Club 15-Storm | 1394 | 12-19 | 39% | 15 | MD |
| 32198 | Premier Volleyball 15 Premier Pulse | 1394 | 9-9 | 47% | 15 | DE |
| 32199 | PSVA Tri County 14-S | 1394 | 8-9 | 47% | 14 | FL |
| 32200 | Phoenix Energy Volleyball Club 14 Phoenix (11) | 1394 | 2-4 | 25% | 14 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.