Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 644 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
32151 Mets 17-Issalex 1395 7-8 47% 17 PR
32152 Cyclones 16-E chaparrals 1395 2-4 33% 16 IL
32153 VC United 16-2 premier 1395 4-11 27% 16 IL
32154 AJV 12 Toro 1395 18-22 45% 12 TX
32155 JEV 13-Black 1395 1-4 20% 13 ID
32156 DVBC Defiance 15-S - lisa 1395 0-3 0% 15 CO
32157 SR 16-1 1395 13-14 48% 16 MN
32158 Volleyball Academy Unlimited 16-1 1395 10-12 37% 16
32159 Mountain1 16-3 keegan 1395 12-16 33% 16 MT
32160 Playeros 15-2 erick 1395 17-19 47% 15 FL
32161 Lake Erie Crush 14-Black 1395 7-6 54% 14
32162 Chi City Elite 17-2 1395 12-26 32% 17 IL
32163 PL Extreme Volleyball 12-2 1395 13-16 45% 12 MN
32164 Club 1 17 Skronkstrong 1395 21-32 40% 17 IL
32165 Raleigh 15 Royal 1395 17-37 31% 15 NC
32166 Carolina Pro Perfomance 13 1395 2-3 40% 13 PR
32167 MCV 15-1 1395 12-12 50% 15 KY
32168 Vortex 14-Black 1395 15-21 42% 14 MO
32169 Independent 10-Ally 1395 0-3 0% 10 IN
32170 417 Juniors 13-2 1395 1-5 17% 13 MO
32171 Kokoro Volleyball 12-2 1395 9-19 29% 12 MN
32172 WI Shock 12 1395 5-8 38% 12 WI
32173 Cajun Coast Athletics 17 1395 6-7 46% 17 LA
32174 CRUSH Volleyball Club 11-Blue 1395 11-19 37% 11 KY
32175 Windom Zeds 12-3 foy 1395 1-3 25% 12 SD
32176 NE D-League 14-White 1395 3-5 30% 14 IA
32177 Black Swamp 14-3 1395 6-10 38% 14 OH
32178 Hammerin' Hawks 13-2 1395 0-3 0% 13 IA
32179 Apex Volleyball Club 15-Gsv 1395 2-6 25% 15 MO
32180 SOCO Swift 13-Teal 1395 1-5 17% 13 CO
32181 EnERgy 13-1 1395 8-9 47% 13 MN
32182 NJVBC 13-Hurricanes 1395 6-7 46% 13 NJ
32183 XP 11-2 spring white 1395 0-3 0% 11 IL
32184 Galaxy 15-1 1395 3-5 38% 15 MO
32185 PVA 15-Gray - ohana 1395 3-11 20% 15 MO
32186 Ozark Storm 15-S 1395 2-3 40% 15 MO
32187 LHVA 14-White regional 1395 9-10 47% 14 NY
32188 Ka Ulukoa 14-R joe 1395 1-4 20% 14 HI
32189 Munciana 13-R bears 1395 7-12 37% 13 IN
32190 KVA 12-Shelby 1395 0-3 0% 12 HI
32191 Victorium 12-Black 1395 20-20 50% 12 AZ
32192 Central Alberta Queens Volleyball Club 15-Ultimate 1395 2-6 25% 15
32193 Action 15 1395 2-6 25% 15 BC
32194 MVP 13-2 1395 4-6 40% 13 OH
32195 Aim High 16 Aim High Curisa 1395 3-7 30% 16
32196 WVC Eagles 15-Girls 1394 2-5 29% 15
32197 Eastern Shore Volleyball Club 15-Storm 1394 12-19 39% 15 MD
32198 Premier Volleyball 15 Premier Pulse 1394 9-9 47% 15 DE
32199 PSVA Tri County 14-S 1394 8-9 47% 14 FL
32200 Phoenix Energy Volleyball Club 14 Phoenix (11) 1394 2-4 25% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.