Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 632 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31551 Aim High 18 Aim High Katie (MI) 1401 8-17 32% 18
31552 Rise 14-National 1401 0-3 0% 14 CA
31553 UVA 12 1401 0-2 0% 12 LA
31554 Enid IMPACT 16-1 1401 11-16 41% 16 OK
31555 SPVC 13-Girls jadon/aaahil 1401 0-3 0% 13 CA
31556 Invasion Volleyball Club 14-2 1401 1-4 17% 14 MO
31557 Storm 13-1 1401 2-3 40% 13 SD
31558 Crossfire 12 Kir 1401 16-24 40% 12 SC
31559 YSVC 17-2 1401 5-8 38% 17 NC
31560 SC Legends 15-White 1401 10-16 38% 15 CA
31561 AEV 13 American 1401 15-26 37% 13 TX
31562 CVC 17-Grey 1401 7-12 37% 17 OH
31563 Digtown 13-Fire 1401 8-16 33% 13 IL
31564 Rogue 13-Violet 1401 3-6 33% 13 OH
31565 RWYVA 14-White 1401 3-6 33% 14 MN
31566 MAVS KC 16-Regional 1401 7-14 33% 16 KS
31567 417 Juniors G17-4 1401 2-4 33% 17 MO
31568 DYNASTY 13-3 stripe 1401 8-16 33% 13 KS
31569 Dinamite Volleyball 18-Cyclone 1401 2-5 29% 18 CA
31570 Patriots 13 1401 2-5 25% 13 MN
31571 Volley Pro 15-Silver 1401 3-8 25% 15 TX
31572 FRVBC 14-3 white 1400 3-4 43% 14 CO
31573 Dynasty Spring 13 1400 15-25 36% 13 TX
31574 Spa City 17-Coral 1400 13-23 36% 17 NY
31575 Indiana South VBC 12U White 1400 11-19 37% 12 IN
31576 Atomic VC 14 1400 13-15 37% 14 AZ
31577 MOJO Volleyball Academy 14-Pink 1400 3-5 38% 14 MD
31578 LCVC 16-2 (NC) 1400 6-9 40% 16 CA
31579 AV IMPACT 14-Leah 1400 10-15 40% 14 CA
31580 Beach Elite 14-Red 1400 11-13 41% 14 UT
31581 Legacy 14-Elite south 1400 18-26 41% 14 MI
31582 Courthouse 18-1 1400 7-10 41% 18 OR
31583 Net Force 13-5 white 1400 13-16 42% 13 IA
31584 305VBC 15-N bruno 1400 26-36 42% 15 FL
31585 Forward 12-Red 1400 11-15 42% 12 FL
31586 RSVBC 14 1400 7-10 35% 14 NV
31587 FIGSV 14-2 1400 13-17 43% 14 CA
31588 Havoc 18-Black 1400 24-32 43% 18 AZ
31589 CINCY EAST 16-3 white 1400 18-24 43% 16 OH
31590 Alliance 18-Hurricanes 1400 14-15 44% 18 MA
31591 FEVA 13-Briana 1400 24-30 44% 13 FL
31592 IGNITE 17-Black 1400 13-16 45% 17 OH
31593 Providence Junior Pilots Volleyball Club 15-Girls navy 1400 2-5 29% 15
31594 Image 17-National 1400 6-12 32% 17
31595 TEVA 11-1 1400 3-6 33% 11 OH
31596 SEIVB 14-Elite 1400 13-10 57% 14 IN
31597 DVC 17-1 1400 4-4 50% 17 NV
31598 LBVC 15-Alan 1400 25-26 49% 15 CA
31599 Laredo Premier 16-Force 1400 10-12 45% 16 TX
31600 TCU Titans 15 1400 0-4 0% 15 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.