Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 633 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31601 Red Viper 17-S 1400 0-3 0% 17 CO
31602 Vernal Velocity 12-Black 1400 1-5 17% 12 UT
31603 Northwood 14-Raasch 1400 1-4 20% 14 IN
31604 GW.Parkway Lightning 13-1 adidas 1400 2-6 22% 13 MO
31605 Top Flight 13-Nu sp 1400 1-3 25% 13 IL
31606 NtroIN 13-3 1400 1-3 25% 13 IN
31607 Vikings 13-Red 1400 3-9 25% 13 MN
31608 LVC 14-Purple 1400 5-11 28% 14 NY
31609 Train4F 18-1 1400 7-18 28% 18 OH
31610 Octane Volleyball Club 17 OCTANE TERRORS 1400 4-10 29% 17 NY
31611 RSVBC 13 1400 6-9 30% 13 NV
31612 Voltage 17 1400 3-6 30% 17 PA
31613 Lake Country Storm 14u 1400 4-6 31% 14 VA
31614 OnSite Coyotes 17u 1400 11-18 35% 17 TX
31615 NWVBC 13-1 1400 3-5 38% 13 WI
31616 OCVC 16-Red 1400 15-25 38% 16 CA
31617 KVA 10-Kelly 1400 0-3 0% 10 TX
31618 Flyers 13-Usa-rico 1400 14-32 30% 13 TX
31619 CAVA 16-Thornton 1400 8-11 42% 16 IN
31620 MVP 12-Black 1400 8-13 38% 12 SC
31621 Storm 12 1400 2-9 14% 12 NY
31622 Legacy 15-1 (FL) 1400 2-12 14% 15 FL
31623 Rhythm 17 Elite 1400 16-21 43% 17 TN
31624 Flyers 15-Usa-margo 1400 14-29 32% 15 TX
31625 Club Esco 17-S 1400 13-14 48% 17 CA
31626 Vision 15-Exv gray 1400 17-24 40% 15 TX
31627 RZVC 16-1 valor 1400 5-14 26% 16 TX
31628 West Coast 15-Sharks 1400 1-6 14% 15 CA
31629 O2VBC 16-Green 1400 10-12 45% 16 NY
31630 Burl Elite 14-Orange 1400 6-14 30% 14 WI
31631 Kap City 14 1400 0-3 0% 14 HI
31632 A4 Volley 12-Bri 1400 12-21 36% 12 CA
31633 United 15-Black 1400 47-28 63% 15 VA
31634 Alliance 16-Lightning 1400 14-20 38% 16 MA
31635 785 Volley 14-National 1400 1-6 14% 14 NE
31636 Club Fusion 13-Phoenix 1400 5-5 50% 13 IL
31637 CPU CVB Storm 11 1400 0-3 0% 11 IA
31638 WI Flight 15-Blue 1400 8-13 38% 15 WI
31639 Underrated VBC 14-1 black 1400 2-5 29% 14 NV
31640 LES 15-Ice 1400 9-12 35% 15 NY
31641 Ark Volley 14-Regional 1400 12-16 43% 14 AR
31642 BCVC 12-Black 1400 9-16 36% 12 AL
31643 VC United SP 12-Navy regional 1400 13-24 34% 12 IL
31644 RRIV 12-Winter 1400 3-7 27% 12 ND
31645 Apex VBTC 12-Peak white 1400 4-6 40% 12 OH
31646 Metrowest VBC 13-Purple 1400 11-12 48% 13 MA
31647 VVA-Butte 14-Jaycee 1400 12-10 40% 14 MT
31648 757 15-Teal 1400 32-37 46% 15 VA
31649 SJVC 13-Black 1400 1-5 17% 13 FL
31650 clubSAV 15-National chandler 1400 8-24 25% 15 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.