Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 631 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31501 SRS 14-Red 1401 13-11 54% 14 SC
31502 AVBC 13-S spades 1401 23-20 53% 13 AZ
31503 ENCORE 12-Premier navy 1401 3-4 43% 12 CA
31504 NCVC 15-Rush - black 1401 7-11 32% 15 NY
31505 Drive Girls 16-Blue 1401 23-23 50% 16 IL
31506 Rapid Fire 16-Purple 1401 2-3 40% 16 IL
31507 Antietam Avengers 13u 1401 21-38 36% 13 PA
31508 Arete 12-Steel ethos 1401 18-25 35% 12 TX
31509 TX VISION 12 TARA 1401 8-12 40% 12 TX
31510 TX Flames 12-Fireballs 1401 0-3 0% 12 TX
31511 Texas One 12-Cobalt 1401 4-12 22% 12 TX
31512 UNION 13-Purple 1401 30-38 44% 13 IN
31513 Amarillo Xtreme 14 Velocity 1401 13-17 43% 14 TX
31514 Lineshot 13-Black regional 1401 5-9 36% 13 OH
31515 Eastside 13-R imler 1401 1-4 20% 13 OH
31516 RJS Sports 15-1 1401 7-11 37% 15 NJ
31517 Tstreet LV 16-Savannah 1401 14-16 47% 16 CA
31518 Sequoia Crush 16-Orange 1401 1-3 20% 16 CA
31519 Beach Cities 18-Smack 1401 10-20 33% 18 CA
31520 EMV 11-Black m?kayla 1401 9-25 24% 11 TX
31521 WGVBA 11-Calm khaos 1401 5-9 36% 11 TX
31522 TC ELITE 14 BARBARA 1401 5-9 33% 14 LA
31523 Future 14-Elite 1401 11-18 38% 14 IL
31524 X-Factor Volleyball 12-1 1401 12-21 35% 12 VA
31525 RCVA Girls 12-Va 1401 5-7 42% 12 VA
31526 Roanoke United 12-Blue 1401 3-8 27% 12 VA
31527 Va Wave 14 Rogue 1401 24-33 42% 14 VA
31528 Coastal Bend Juniors 16 WAVE 1401 10-10 50% 16 TX
31529 AJV 16-Cedar park 1401 18-27 40% 16 TX
31530 ACCEL 16-Black drever 1401 11-25 27% 16 TX
31531 MoCo Volleyball Club 12 MOCO Maestros (CH) 1401 0-3 0% 12
31532 All Out 14 1401 23-27 46% 14 WA
31533 Bear Paw 12 1401 7-7 35% 12 MT
31534 Red Viper Volleyball 17 1401 2-4 33% 17 CO
31535 CJVA 14-Ruby 1401 12-18 40% 14 NJ
31536 Stars 12 Daniel 1401 14-20 41% 12 SC
31537 FORZA1 12-Elite 1401 14-19 42% 12 CA
31538 C1VB 15-Select grvl 1401 16-21 43% 15 SC
31539 Central Kansas Rampage 15-1 1401 4-9 25% 15 KS
31540 Juggernaut 14-Regional 2 1401 22-27 45% 14 CO
31541 DENVER JUNIORS 14-Madeline 1401 13-16 45% 14 CO
31542 Rival 17 Teal 1401 18-26 41% 17 NY
31543 Tsunami 17-1n 1401 12-17 41% 17 GA
31544 Kansas Phantoms 13-1 1401 2-2 40% 13 KS
31545 SOL 15-2 1401 1-4 20% 15 TX
31546 Infinity 14-Gray 1401 9-8 53% 14 OH
31547 AVA TX 15-Extreme 1401 9-9 50% 15 TX
31548 Cyclones Arctic 15 1401 1-6 14% 15
31549 St. Croix Select 17 SC Select Pink 1401 7-8 47% 17 WI
31550 NNVC 14 1401 12-11 48% 14 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.