Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 626 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31251 AV Coach Justin / Coach Miller 16 1404 2-4 33% 16 CA
31252 CCVBC 16-Armanie 1404 15-21 42% 16 CA
31253 FORZA1 16-National black 1404 19-22 46% 16 CA
31254 Stingray VBC 16-1 1404 5-9 36% 16 CA
31255 Next Level Volleyball Academy - NLVA 16-Joleen 1404 10-23 30% 16 CA
31256 PRECISION ONE 16-Instate green 1404 1-3 25% 16 IA
31257 All In 14-Black 1404 4-2 67% 14 IL
31258 OD VOLLEYBALL 14 OD Blue (GL) 1404 5-6 45% 14 IL
31259 Mid State Force 14 Blac 1404 3-5 33% 14 IL
31260 Rolling Thunder 14 Ruby 1404 18-20 46% 14 IL
31261 KIVA 14 Anna 1404 0-3 0% 14 KY
31262 Chicago Premier VBC 18 18 GOLD (GL) 1404 4-4 50% 18
31263 FEVA 18-Ally 1404 18-24 43% 18 FL
31264 BIG ISLAND GIRLS 18 1404 1-4 20% 18 HI
31265 RBA 16-0range 1404 3-6 33% 16 FL
31266 Horns 16-K1 1404 12-11 52% 16 FL
31267 LEGACY 16-Premier martina 1404 18-21 46% 16 FL
31268 New Waves 16-Tomas 1404 12-15 44% 16 FL
31269 KOKUA 14-Development 1404 2-5 29% 14 WA
31270 Alliance 16-R 1403 5-9 36% 16 PA
31271 Coastal 14-Elite 1403 16-33 33% 14 FL
31272 AZ 3 16-Goddard 1403 5-7 42% 16 AZ
31273 CLUB STEEL 15-Llanek 1403 17-17 50% 15 FL
31274 Intense 15-S -sarah 1403 23-21 52% 15 LA
31275 KNVBC 15-Crossfire 1403 2-5 29% 15 KS
31276 PNW VBC 14-4 grey 1403 13-13 50% 14 OR
31277 Central City 11 1403 1-3 25% 11 IA
31278 Southern Pines Volleyball Club 14 SPVC Stone Pine 1403 3-4 43% 14 GA
31279 DASH VB 11-Red 1403 7-6 54% 11 WI
31280 ATX Aces White 11 1403 17-21 45% 11 TX
31281 NW Jrs 14-White 1403 23-32 42% 14 WA
31282 Show 18-1vanderkooy 1403 10-14 42% 18 ID
31283 PR Arsenal 10 1403 1-4 20% 10 PR
31284 Metro VBC 12-Black 1403 17-26 40% 12 IN
31285 ReignVBA 14-1 1403 1-5 13% 14 CO
31286 Mt. Hood 12-2 meadows 1403 12-19 39% 12 OR
31287 PROZONE FL 13-Red 1403 10-13 43% 13 FL
31288 NASA 16-White la 1403 13-16 45% 16 AL
31289 DE Eagles 16-Blue 1403 9-11 45% 16 MN
31290 DSV 17-1 1403 7-12 35% 17 AZ
31291 Faribault Red 16-1 1403 1-3 25% 16 MN
31292 Buckeyefire 14-3 pamer 1403 16-17 48% 14 OH
31293 Outsiders 14-Z 1403 15-14 52% 14 IN
31294 Sideout VBC 12-1 1403 3-5 38% 12 WA
31295 Houston Force 14-Jedi 1403 6-8 33% 14 TX
31296 River City Jrs 13-Red 1403 24-25 49% 13 IA
31297 Parker VC 14-S 1403 4-14 22% 14 AZ
31298 PEVC 12-Zaylee 1403 4-12 24% 12 SC
31299 QVA 17-Hydrogen 1403 22-30 42% 17 FL
31300 Fearless Elite 12-2 1403 9-16 36% 12 AR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.