2025-2026 Season — Page 626 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31251 | AV Coach Justin / Coach Miller 16 | 1404 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | CA |
| 31252 | CCVBC 16-Armanie | 1404 | 15-21 | 42% | 16 | CA |
| 31253 | FORZA1 16-National black | 1404 | 19-22 | 46% | 16 | CA |
| 31254 | Stingray VBC 16-1 | 1404 | 5-9 | 36% | 16 | CA |
| 31255 | Next Level Volleyball Academy - NLVA 16-Joleen | 1404 | 10-23 | 30% | 16 | CA |
| 31256 | PRECISION ONE 16-Instate green | 1404 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | IA |
| 31257 | All In 14-Black | 1404 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | IL |
| 31258 | OD VOLLEYBALL 14 OD Blue (GL) | 1404 | 5-6 | 45% | 14 | IL |
| 31259 | Mid State Force 14 Blac | 1404 | 3-5 | 33% | 14 | IL |
| 31260 | Rolling Thunder 14 Ruby | 1404 | 18-20 | 46% | 14 | IL |
| 31261 | KIVA 14 Anna | 1404 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | KY |
| 31262 | Chicago Premier VBC 18 18 GOLD (GL) | 1404 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | |
| 31263 | FEVA 18-Ally | 1404 | 18-24 | 43% | 18 | FL |
| 31264 | BIG ISLAND GIRLS 18 | 1404 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | HI |
| 31265 | RBA 16-0range | 1404 | 3-6 | 33% | 16 | FL |
| 31266 | Horns 16-K1 | 1404 | 12-11 | 52% | 16 | FL |
| 31267 | LEGACY 16-Premier martina | 1404 | 18-21 | 46% | 16 | FL |
| 31268 | New Waves 16-Tomas | 1404 | 12-15 | 44% | 16 | FL |
| 31269 | KOKUA 14-Development | 1404 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | WA |
| 31270 | Alliance 16-R | 1403 | 5-9 | 36% | 16 | PA |
| 31271 | Coastal 14-Elite | 1403 | 16-33 | 33% | 14 | FL |
| 31272 | AZ 3 16-Goddard | 1403 | 5-7 | 42% | 16 | AZ |
| 31273 | CLUB STEEL 15-Llanek | 1403 | 17-17 | 50% | 15 | FL |
| 31274 | Intense 15-S -sarah | 1403 | 23-21 | 52% | 15 | LA |
| 31275 | KNVBC 15-Crossfire | 1403 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | KS |
| 31276 | PNW VBC 14-4 grey | 1403 | 13-13 | 50% | 14 | OR |
| 31277 | Central City 11 | 1403 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | IA |
| 31278 | Southern Pines Volleyball Club 14 SPVC Stone Pine | 1403 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | GA |
| 31279 | DASH VB 11-Red | 1403 | 7-6 | 54% | 11 | WI |
| 31280 | ATX Aces White 11 | 1403 | 17-21 | 45% | 11 | TX |
| 31281 | NW Jrs 14-White | 1403 | 23-32 | 42% | 14 | WA |
| 31282 | Show 18-1vanderkooy | 1403 | 10-14 | 42% | 18 | ID |
| 31283 | PR Arsenal 10 | 1403 | 1-4 | 20% | 10 | PR |
| 31284 | Metro VBC 12-Black | 1403 | 17-26 | 40% | 12 | IN |
| 31285 | ReignVBA 14-1 | 1403 | 1-5 | 13% | 14 | CO |
| 31286 | Mt. Hood 12-2 meadows | 1403 | 12-19 | 39% | 12 | OR |
| 31287 | PROZONE FL 13-Red | 1403 | 10-13 | 43% | 13 | FL |
| 31288 | NASA 16-White la | 1403 | 13-16 | 45% | 16 | AL |
| 31289 | DE Eagles 16-Blue | 1403 | 9-11 | 45% | 16 | MN |
| 31290 | DSV 17-1 | 1403 | 7-12 | 35% | 17 | AZ |
| 31291 | Faribault Red 16-1 | 1403 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | MN |
| 31292 | Buckeyefire 14-3 pamer | 1403 | 16-17 | 48% | 14 | OH |
| 31293 | Outsiders 14-Z | 1403 | 15-14 | 52% | 14 | IN |
| 31294 | Sideout VBC 12-1 | 1403 | 3-5 | 38% | 12 | WA |
| 31295 | Houston Force 14-Jedi | 1403 | 6-8 | 33% | 14 | TX |
| 31296 | River City Jrs 13-Red | 1403 | 24-25 | 49% | 13 | IA |
| 31297 | Parker VC 14-S | 1403 | 4-14 | 22% | 14 | AZ |
| 31298 | PEVC 12-Zaylee | 1403 | 4-12 | 24% | 12 | SC |
| 31299 | QVA 17-Hydrogen | 1403 | 22-30 | 42% | 17 | FL |
| 31300 | Fearless Elite 12-2 | 1403 | 9-16 | 36% | 12 | AR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.