Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 627 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31301 Country Fire 15-2 1403 13-16 43% 15 TX
31302 CUVB 15-White 1403 1-3 20% 15 TX
31303 Catalyst 15-Black 1403 8-16 33% 15 TX
31304 Xcel 16 1403 6-7 46% 16 FL
31305 Goldenwest 14-Tower zero 1403 8-14 36% 14 CA
31306 UVA 14 Power 1403 25-29 46% 14 CA
31307 LAVA West 14-Flame 1403 13-15 46% 14 CA
31308 2L 16-Hybrid 1403 1-3 25% 16 FL
31309 Carolina CHAOS 17-White 1403 5-9 36% 17 NC
31310 KC Dominance G16-1 1403 10-15 36% 16
31311 WPVC 15-Armour white 1403 25-43 37% 15 FL
31312 DCVA 13-N1 1403 2-5 29% 13 CO
31313 Monsters 12-Blue 1403 14-13 52% 12 MI
31314 Underwood Slammers 15-1 1403 0-4 0% 15 MN
31315 ATHENAVB 15-Gold select 1403 1-6 14% 15 MN
31316 NC Elite 14-Black 1403 14-30 32% 14 NC
31317 LHV Girls 17-2 origin 1403 24-25 49% 17 MA
31318 Mission 15-Elite 1403 18-16 53% 15 IL
31319 NXGVB 14 1403 16-21 43% 14 TN
31320 Stanly Extreme 16 Celeste 1403 1-4 20% 16 NC
31321 JoCo 16-Black 1403 7-15 32% 16 NC
31322 Courthouse 18-Blue 1403 18-24 42% 18 OR
31323 Park City Juniors 16 1403 7-10 26% 16 UT
31324 PEVC 12-Jianna 1403 11-17 39% 12 SC
31325 OMNI 12 Elite 1403 19-24 44% 12 CA
31326 LA STORM 12-Blue 1403 10-17 37% 12 CA
31327 MAVA 14-GreatWhite 1403 16-23 41% 14 KY
31328 Empire 16-Power jordan 1403 30-29 51% 16 CA
31329 Downstate 15-Panthers 1403 14-15 48% 15 NY
31330 FoothillVBC 15-Blue hooper 1403 20-20 50% 15 CA
31331 RVC Force 14-S 1403 35-41 45% 14 MN
31332 TxACES 12-1 1403 13-16 41% 12 TX
31333 Atlanta Extreme 11-Alyssa 1403 13-12 52% 11 GA
31334 Yorktowne VB 14-White 1403 16-23 41% 14 PA
31335 Next Level 13-Nikki 1403 3-7 30% 13 MI
31336 ARAA 17-Maroon 1403 8-10 42% 17 MN
31337 Mass Pats 13-1 commitment 1403 10-11 45% 13 MA
31338 Boston United 18-Northeast 1403 23-24 49% 18 MA
31339 White Stone Volleyball Club 14 White Stone U13/14 1403 4-4 50% 14 CA
31340 Rocky Mountain Mavericks Volleyball Club 15-Girls 1403 1-6 14% 15
31341 WI Shock 13-Pink 1403 4-10 29% 13 WI
31342 Academy 13-Ruby 1403 3-6 33% 13 NC
31343 Tribe 13-1 1403 2-6 25% 13 OH
31344 ADREN 14-2 1403 2-7 22% 14 OH
31345 Eastlake 14-Kamryn 1403 2-4 33% 14 CA
31346 Roanoke United 17-White 1403 9-19 32% 17 VA
31347 NUF 14-Black 1403 22-27 45% 14 IN
31348 Torrance Volleyball Club 14 1403 8-26 24% 14 CA
31349 Hermantown 11-S 1403 1-3 25% 11 MN
31350 Red Volleyball Club 13 * RED VBC Travis 1403 0-3 0% 13 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.