Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 625 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31201 Fundamental Sports Academy 13 FSA Aces 1404 0-3 0% 13 GA
31202 TX Legends 15 Cobalt 1404 10-14 40% 15 TX
31203 Digtown 12 Elite 1404 15-17 47% 12 IL
31204 NC 16-2 1404 4-5 44% 16 ND
31205 CKVC 11 1404 4-5 44% 11 IN
31206 DE Eagles 18-Blue 1404 9-9 50% 18 MN
31207 Ut Bounce 15-White 1404 15-14 41% 15 UT
31208 Panther 17-2 1404 4-4 50% 17 CO
31209 Colibris 17-Velvet 30 1404 5-10 33% 17 CO
31210 Matrix 14-Kaitlin 2026 1404 2-5 29% 14 AZ
31211 Yessah Volleyball Club 14 1404 3-4 43% 14 NV
31212 MAVS KC Select 11-3 1404 2-2 50% 11 KS
31213 Elite 17 Premier 1404 3-4 43% 17 MO
31214 MAVA 11-Tiger 1404 16-25 39% 11 KY
31215 Lakerz 16 1404 2-3 40% 16 MN
31216 308 Exclusive VBC 14-Black 1404 8-9 44% 14 NE
31217 NMB 15-Regional nyasia 1404 1-3 25% 15 FL
31218 Jays 14-White 1404 0-2 0% 14 ND
31219 Temecula Viper 14-2 justin 1404 14-17 45% 14 CA
31220 SADDLEBACK 14-Lily 1404 9-12 43% 14 CA
31221 SVA 14-2 1404 10-15 40% 14 CA
31222 Horizonvbc 14-1 1404 13-13 50% 14 CA
31223 SVC NGV 12-Brian 1404 7-9 44% 12 GA
31224 Club Unite 12-Lw gray 1404 10-15 36% 12 TN
31225 Five:1 16-White 1404 28-52 35% 16 MI
31226 LA Diggers 17-S 1404 8-10 44% 17 MN
31227 EVBCS 17-National 1404 2-5 29% 17 MN
31228 Wisconsin Attack 17-Red 1404 20-33 38% 17 WI
31229 Mass Impact 18-Mike 1404 24-28 46% 18 MA
31230 SLAM 16-P white 1404 25-27 48% 16 MA
31231 PV 16-National 1404 9-33 21% 16 MA
31232 SLAM 16-N 1404 3-8 27% 16 MA
31233 UV 18-Lili 1404 21-20 51% 18 AR
31234 IVBA SOAR 11-Ren 1404 6-10 38% 11 MS
31235 Alliance 13-Red 1404 17-25 40% 13 CA
31236 Mid Coast 13-1 1404 5-11 31% 13 CA
31237 Thrive 13 Teal 1404 15-25 38% 13 CA
31238 SLV Proffitt 18U 1404 10-11 48% 18 VA
31239 SKEVA EAST 18-1 1404 13-16 45% 18 KY
31240 FL Conquer 14 State 1404 12-16 43% 14 FL
31241 Tsunami 15-1n leann 1404 13-15 46% 15 GA
31242 606 United VBC 16 UNITED INFERNO (PR) 1404 8-10 44% 16 KY
31243 AVA 16-1 1404 9-17 35% 16 KS
31244 EU 16-Platinum 1404 23-30 43% 16 IN
31245 KW Club 14-2 1404 1-3 25% 14 MN
31246 NE D-League 17-Black 1404 3-7 30% 17 IA
31247 LIV 12-S 1404 3-5 38% 12 CA
31248 XP 16-National 2 1404 23-21 50% 16 IL
31249 Valley Flames 12-Red 1404 11-14 44% 12 TX
31250 SABIDURIA 18 1404 0-0 0% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.