Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 622 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31051 LVC 14-1 1405 13-8 62% 14 NY
31052 Panther Pride VBC 18 1405 9-10 39% 18 NY
31053 Strike Force 14-Black 1405 14-24 37% 14 WA
31054 White Cross Elite 14-Izzy 1405 1-4 20% 14 NC
31055 Lakas 16-Power 2 1405 15-20 43% 16 CA
31056 Club Gold 15-Black 1405 12-24 33% 15 WA
31057 Velocity 17-Black 1405 4-8 33% 17 AZ
31058 Atlanta Extreme 13 Meredith 1405 23-29 44% 13 GA
31059 Club GSL 14-Elite - vernon 1405 13-20 34% 14 UT
31060 Wisconsin Ice 17 National 1405 18-28 39% 17 WI
31061 ERAA 11-2 1405 3-7 30% 11 MN
31062 Pipeline 16-Boost vaaj 1405 20-21 49% 16 CA
31063 SVBC Blazers 15 Mackenzie 1405 12-15 44% 15 SC
31064 85 South VBC 15-Black 1405 15-10 60% 15 GA
31065 Pipeline 16-2 1405 23-21 52% 16 CA
31066 Falcon Fire 11-1 1405 4-9 31% 11 MN
31067 KIVA 13 KIVA Brooke (PR) (31) 1405 1-3 25% 13 KY
31068 208vbc 16 208 U15/16 SB (EV) 1405 10-16 38% 16 ID
31069 Emerald Raindrops 13-3 1405 7-7 50% 13 WA
31070 LuMaDe 16-Yellow 1405 11-18 38% 16 FL
31071 MPV 16-Elite green 1405 11-16 37% 16 UT
31072 Kershaw Spark Volleyball Club 16 Kershaw Spark VC (PM) (19) 1405 2-3 40% 16 SC
31073 Rev 16-Blue 1405 21-19 53% 16 IL
31074 RISE 712 12-2 1405 2-7 22% 12 IA
31075 Slam VBC 12-Maroon 1405 1-4 20% 12 WI
31076 Ozark Juniors 10-White 1405 12-16 41% 10 AR
31077 Epic United 15 Excel 1405 29-23 56% 15 IL
31078 Metrowest VBC 15-Garnet 1405 6-16 21% 15 MA
31079 Aspire NW 10-1 empire 1405 5-12 29% 10 OR
31080 C-Force VBC 16-2 1405 1-4 20% 16 TN
31081 Havoc Volleyball 14-Black 1405 23-30 43% 14 AZ
31082 PowerPlex Iowa Heart 14-Black 1405 0-5 0% 14 IA
31083 Iowa Matrix 14 1405 1-3 20% 14 IA
31084 SVC NG ACES 17-Select 1405 17-24 41% 17 GA
31085 Aggression 11-1 premier 1405 4-6 40% 11 IL
31086 Apex NW 13-Elevate 1405 11-16 41% 13 WA
31087 Elite Juniors 14-2 1405 5-5 50% 14 OH
31088 Next 14-Silver 1405 9-11 45% 14 OH
31089 VOLT 14-Charge 1405 7-12 37% 14 ND
31090 Diamond Volleyball Academy 15 DVA GOLD 1405 0-3 0% 15 FL
31091 Top-Tier 16U 1405 9-9 45% 16 TX
31092 Skyline Club Volleyball 16-Silver 1405 19-26 38% 16 CO
31093 RVC 16-Grind 1405 22-28 44% 16 CO
31094 Hawaiian Style 12 1405 2-3 40% 12 HI
31095 TEVA 12-2 1405 4-10 29% 12 OH
31096 LTVA 15 1405 9-12 43% 15 NV
31097 Chi City Elite 13-2 1405 20-28 42% 13 IL
31098 Elite Juniors 12-1 1405 4-6 40% 12 OH
31099 T4VBC 12-Royal 1405 1-5 14% 12 TX
31100 NWAS VBC 16-Alpha 1405 18-35 34% 16 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.