Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 621 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31001 NCA Elite 13-S 1406 4-6 40% 13 AR
31002 316VBC 14-1 1406 7-12 28% 14 KS
31003 VOLT 15-2 1406 28-31 47% 15 ND
31004 Independent Volleyball Club 14-1 1406 1-3 25% 14
31005 Next Level 18 Naupaka 1406 17-25 40% 18 NV
31006 RBA 14-Orange 1406 3-5 38% 14 FL
31007 SC Elite 15-Navy-audrey 1406 16-19 46% 15 SC
31008 M2 Volleyball 15-N3 1406 23-21 52% 15 GA
31009 NYC Volley Verse 14 Gold 1406 15-22 41% 14 NY
31010 O2VBC 14-White 1406 4-6 40% 14 NY
31011 MVC 12-Thomsen 1406 9-9 50% 12 UT
31012 XP 16-National 1 1406 30-25 55% 16 IL
31013 Inside Out 12-Black 1406 16-16 50% 12 MI
31014 Illini Elite 16-L navy 1406 16-16 50% 16 IL
31015 Inside Out 12-Purple 1406 1-3 25% 12 MI
31016 797 Empire 13-S 1406 10-16 38% 13 TX
31017 TW Skyline 13-Black 1406 14-28 33% 13 TX
31018 BHJ NH 17-1 1406 2-3 40% 17 SD
31019 Prime 15 Molten 1406 15-25 38% 15 CA
31020 SoCal VBC 15-Playa 1406 10-17 37% 15 CA
31021 SPRING Mini 407 11-Maya adriana 1406 1-3 25% 11 FL
31022 Outlaw 18 1406 16-26 36% 18 TX
31023 TopSpin 13-Blue 1406 10-15 40% 13 KY
31024 MOXIE COQUI TUPELO 17-Blue 1406 7-17 28% 17 MS
31025 207VBC 15-3 1406 8-8 36% 15 ME
31026 JET 11 BUNDY 1406 5-8 38% 11 TX
31027 Train4F 15-1 1406 10-16 38% 15 OH
31028 HOVA 15-A white 1406 9-14 39% 15 OH
31029 FAVBC CO 15 1406 0-3 0% 15 CO
31030 St. Charles Heat 10-1 1406 0-4 0% 10 MN
31031 CONQUERORS 14-1 1405 1-3 25% 14 OK
31032 Monarch 13 1405 0-3 0% 13 NE
31033 Rise 14-2 1405 21-21 47% 14 OK
31034 Hometown Heat 13-Spark 1405 8-11 42% 13 WI
31035 Delano 12-Orange 1405 1-3 25% 12 MN
31036 ICA 13-1 1405 13-21 38% 13 CA
31037 GSVC 17-Gold 1405 1-4 20% 17 NH
31038 WPVC 12-Mini black 1405 0-0 0% 12 FL
31039 Smash 14-2s 1405 8-11 42% 14 WI
31040 FVA 18-1 1405 14-15 48% 18 MO
31041 G1 14-1 1405 8-11 42% 14 AR
31042 MCVC Green 12-1 1405 3-5 38% 12 IN
31043 EVRC DEV RED 12 1405 1-3 25% 12 IN
31044 ForceVC 13-3 1405 5-10 33% 13 OH
31045 Riptide Volleyball Club 17 Riptide - Haleigh 1405 5-10 33% 17 CA
31046 AppVC 14-Zonal 1405 5-10 33% 14 NC
31047 OVA 11-Prime 1405 1-4 20% 11 CA
31048 FTL UTD Volleyball 14 FTLUTD Fusion Kayla (FL) 1405 5-6 45% 14 FL
31049 Panthers 14 1405 1-3 25% 14 FL
31050 Winnerz Circle 14-2 1405 1-4 20% 14 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.