Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 623 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
31101 Sunset West 10-Stars 1405 0-3 0% 10 NE
31102 Seal Beach 12-White 1405 11-22 33% 12 CA
31103 Prism 16 Emerald 1405 28-35 44% 16 WA
31104 Texas Fury 16-Fusion 1405 20-25 44% 16 TX
31105 NCWVBC 12-2 black 1405 6-10 38% 12 WA
31106 Cape Coast 10-Explorer 1405 3-7 30% 10 FL
31107 SSVC 18 1405 2-3 40% 18 NC
31108 Wisconsin Blaze 13-Red 1405 10-13 43% 13 WI
31109 Farmington Force 10 1405 3-5 33% 10 MO
31110 Memphis Volleyball Academy 17 MemphisVBAcademy17/18Pink 1405 22-27 45% 17 MS
31111 Momentum One 14-Tsunami 1405 11-23 32% 14 WA
31112 Coalfield Xtreme 14 1405 10-18 36% 14 VA
31113 Legends 13-3 eggy 1405 2-3 40% 13 PR
31114 Tell City Volleyball Club Crimson Crushers 13 1405 5-13 28% 13 IN
31115 Sideout 16-Elite-2 1405 14-21 40% 16 FL
31116 QC Panthers 11-Pink 1405 1-3 25% 11 IA
31117 A5 Volleyball Club 14 A5 West D 1405 20-21 49% 14 GA
31118 Fard Academy 18 1405 0-4 0% 18 FL
31119 North Point 15-Regional 1405 8-11 40% 15 TX
31120 Crush 18-S 1405 18-26 41% 18 CA
31121 VIP Academy 18-1 1405 3-11 21% 18 TX
31122 Rockwood Thunder 15-Gray 1405 20-23 44% 15 MO
31123 Las Guapas 18-1 javier 1405 1-4 20% 18 PR
31124 AirStrike 14 (MI) 1405 7-10 41% 14 MI
31125 CEV Onyx 15-3 1405 5-6 45% 15 OH
31126 Maks 18 1405 9-19 32% 18 ID
31127 SLAM 14-Black 1405 14-28 33% 14 TX
31128 Titans 17 1405 7-11 35% 17 VA
31129 Impulse 11-Black 1405 4-7 36% 11 IN
31130 Santa Barbara 14-Elite 2 1405 3-5 38% 14 CA
31131 1915 Excel VC 17-1 1405 3-5 38% 17 FL
31132 JC Serv-ivors Black 13 1405 14-18 40% 13 IL
31133 Game Day 14-3 1405 15-21 41% 14 OR
31134 PVCGA 17-1 1405 9-13 41% 17 GA
31135 Riverton Volleyball Association 15 Riverton Volleyball Association 1405 1-4 20% 15
31136 South Shore Royals 14 1405 2-7 22% 14
31137 SAVAGES VC 18-1 1405 18-23 42% 18 TX
31138 T4 Volleyball 12-G navy 1405 6-8 43% 12 IL
31139 JRBISON 17 1405 11-13 46% 17 WY
31140 Alabama Perf 13-N red 1405 28-28 50% 13 AL
31141 BWVC 12 Premier 1405 20-20 50% 12 FL
31142 Club Unite 13-Knox gold 1405 16-15 52% 13 TN
31143 Renaissance 16-Red 1405 17-28 38% 16 OH
31144 TriCounty ATTACK 14-Blue 1404 3-9 25% 14 NJ
31145 Fort McMurray Thunder 14-Blue 1404 1-6 14% 14
31146 ICV 16-Vargas 1404 1-4 20% 16
31147 Net Force 14-Blaze 1404 1-3 25% 14 IA
31148 The EDGE 17 Maroon 1404 26-41 39% 17 CO
31149 City Beach 11-Black 1404 22-29 43% 11 CA
31150 Renaissance 17-White 1404 4-6 40% 17 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.