Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 594 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29651 Allegiant 17-Red 1419 7-12 35% 17 TX
29652 Shockwave 14 1419 0-3 0% 14 WA
29653 SPRING Mini 407 12-Mckenzie 1419 2-4 33% 12 FL
29654 Prodigy 15-2 elite 1419 13-31 30% 15 NY
29655 NLV 15-1 1419 15-17 47% 15 GA
29656 Volitude 15-White 1419 16-18 47% 15 CA
29657 United 16-Bhm black 1419 10-18 36% 16 AL
29658 Carolina Sky 15-Premier 1419 17-15 53% 15 SC
29659 Vital 12-Ydt sophie 1419 4-6 40% 12 MN
29660 Starlings Tucson 12-Blue 1419 22-19 54% 12 AZ
29661 Boom 13-U - teal 1419 1-3 25% 13 OH
29662 AVC CLE 13 Gold 1419 22-33 40% 13 OH
29663 AZRVB 12 Riot 1419 29-32 48% 12 AZ
29664 Impact VBC 12-1 1419 1-3 25% 12 NY
29665 CCJ 16-2 1419 19-20 49% 16 OR
29666 BVC 15-1 (NO) 1419 7-14 32% 15 MN
29667 Swarm 15-Black 1419 4-10 29% 15 MN
29668 Anthracite Attack 15U SILVER 1419 1-3 25% 15 PA
29669 St. Joe Storm 17-2 1419 1-3 25% 17 MO
29670 Invasion Volleyball Club 17-2 1419 1-3 25% 17 MO
29671 MCVC Gold 11-1 1419 3-5 38% 11 IN
29672 Madtown 14-2 regional 1419 9-11 39% 14 WI
29673 Bitterroot Storm 18 Bitterroot Storm 1419 8-7 44% 18
29674 DNA 17-G blue 1418 32-36 47% 17 FL
29675 516 Elite 15-White 1418 15-16 48% 15 NY
29676 VVC 12 1418 1-3 25% 12
29677 Grimsby Volleyball Association 15 15U Grimsby Vipers Invasion (CA) 1418 1-3 25% 15
29678 Southwest Raiders 16 Southwest raiders 1418 1-4 20% 16
29679 Red Rock 14-Eric - redwood city 1418 2-6 25% 14 CA
29680 Vibe 16 Vibe Zen 1418 2-5 29% 16 CA
29681 Sullivan Elite 18 1418 5-7 36% 18 MO
29682 Spiketown Storm 14 1418 17-29 37% 14 WI
29683 Idaho ONE 15-Im hart 1418 19-32 37% 15 ID
29684 Wisconsin Ice 12-White 1418 3-5 38% 12 WI
29685 Lunatics Volleyball Club 13 LVC Lunatics Sydney 1418 3-4 38% 13 UT
29686 Club 1 SS 13 1418 1-3 25% 13 IL
29687 Hunter Dynasty Sports 12 Jr. Raiders 1418 1-3 25% 12 IN
29688 Winter League 12-1 1418 1-3 25% 12 IL
29689 ID Crush 14-Report 1418 3-5 38% 14 ID
29690 RockCity 17 A1 1418 11-13 46% 17 OH
29691 Impact 15-1 1418 13-15 46% 15 MN
29692 SR 17-1 1418 8-10 44% 17 MN
29693 Sanford Sports 14-White 1418 14-23 38% 14 SD
29694 Kimball 14-Gold 1418 0-2 0% 14 MN
29695 EXCELL 14-1 carley select 1418 16-19 46% 14 SC
29696 CYVBC Surge 16-Blue 1418 14-25 36% 16 OH
29697 Premier 15 Premier 1418 6-7 35% 15 UT
29698 CUZINS 10 1418 1-3 25% 10 HI
29699 KIVA Margaret 11-3 1418 3-7 30% 11 KY
29700 ARVC 14-Teal adidas 1418 23-27 45% 14 NM
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.