2025-2026 Season — Page 595 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29701 | Marion Magic 10 | 1418 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | IA |
| 29702 | EVC Black 14-1 | 1418 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | WA |
| 29703 | OVVC 17-Aqua | 1418 | 8-7 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 29704 | SNVF 15-Mount olympus | 1418 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | WA |
| 29705 | Extreme 15-Todd | 1418 | 7-9 | 44% | 15 | WA |
| 29706 | MiElite 15-Scott north | 1418 | 6-3 | 60% | 15 | MI |
| 29707 | AR Metro 14-Regional plus | 1418 | 21-28 | 43% | 14 | AR |
| 29708 | CVS 17-Brandi | 1418 | 24-29 | 45% | 17 | CA |
| 29709 | Shoebox Volleyball 17-2 | 1418 | 12-12 | 48% | 17 | MI |
| 29710 | Empower Volleyball 12 Empower Kidz Power (PM) (16) | 1418 | 1-4 | 17% | 12 | SC |
| 29711 | Galaxy 12 Cindy | 1418 | 11-12 | 48% | 12 | NC |
| 29712 | NoDak Juniors 12 | 1418 | 6-10 | 33% | 12 | ND |
| 29713 | CVH SELECT 12-1 | 1418 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | PR |
| 29714 | A4 Volley 14-Lolo | 1418 | 9-19 | 32% | 14 | CA |
| 29715 | 417 Missouri Juniors 16-1 hawks | 1418 | 0-7 | 0% | 16 | MO |
| 29716 | SynergyForce 14-Spades | 1418 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | CA |
| 29717 | COLAVOL 16 Carolina | 1418 | 19-16 | 54% | 16 | GA |
| 29718 | SLAM 13-R white | 1418 | 10-9 | 53% | 13 | MA |
| 29719 | WVC 15-Wave | 1418 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | MN |
| 29720 | Southern Swing 17-Blue | 1418 | 10-13 | 43% | 17 | TX |
| 29721 | The EDGE 13 Maroon (RM) | 1418 | 22-32 | 41% | 13 | CO |
| 29722 | HI BRED VBC 16-Purple wahine | 1418 | 1-4 | 20% | 16 | HI |
| 29723 | Black Canyon Volleyball Club 13 Black Canyon MK | 1418 | 0-3 | 0% | 13 | CO |
| 29724 | Premier 11-2 white | 1418 | 10-18 | 33% | 11 | AL |
| 29725 | NSVBC 13-Regional black | 1418 | 2-8 | 17% | 13 | WI |
| 29726 | Sedalia Stealth VBC 13-1 | 1418 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | MO |
| 29727 | NE Top Flight 16-Gold | 1418 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | NE |
| 29728 | Ultimate G15 Silver | 1418 | 15-12 | 56% | 15 | IL |
| 29729 | Banzai VBC 16-Select | 1418 | 9-22 | 29% | 16 | NE |
| 29730 | RAGE Volleyball 18 | 1418 | 17-18 | 46% | 18 | WI |
| 29731 | UVC 12-Ellie | 1418 | 4-6 | 40% | 12 | IL |
| 29732 | Ichiban 13 Amazon | 1418 | 19-19 | 48% | 13 | GA |
| 29733 | 575 13-Pcvc all stars | 1418 | 3-4 | 33% | 13 | GA |
| 29734 | Atomic Force 11-White | 1418 | 2-5 | 22% | 11 | MN |
| 29735 | Rockford 14-Purple | 1418 | 10-11 | 48% | 14 | IL |
| 29736 | AP 15-Wilco white | 1418 | 14-18 | 41% | 15 | TX |
| 29737 | CJV 13-Local+ blue | 1418 | 5-11 | 31% | 13 | NC |
| 29738 | CUVC 13-R leah | 1418 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | NC |
| 29739 | Rapid Fire 10-Pink | 1418 | 4-11 | 27% | 10 | IL |
| 29740 | Alpha Volleyball Academy 17-1 | 1418 | 4-8 | 33% | 17 | KS |
| 29741 | CAVA 14-McIntyre | 1418 | 7-9 | 44% | 14 | IN |
| 29742 | ADSV Dev 11-1 | 1418 | 8-12 | 31% | 11 | TX |
| 29743 | WCJ 11-4 | 1418 | 2-4 | 22% | 11 | TX |
| 29744 | Club Focus 14 FOCUS TUA | 1418 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | OH |
| 29745 | OVVC 14-Blue | 1418 | 8-12 | 40% | 14 | OH |
| 29746 | Boiler Jrs 14-2mi onyx | 1418 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | IN |
| 29747 | Apex Volleyball Academy 14-2 | 1418 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | OH |
| 29748 | Northern Revival 17 | 1418 | 20-26 | 43% | 17 | MN |
| 29749 | Big Cat 14-Purple | 1418 | 3-5 | 33% | 14 | IA |
| 29750 | Team Colorado 14-N | 1418 | 25-26 | 49% | 14 | CO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.