Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 593 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29601 MDJRS 14-Elite yellow 1419 23-32 40% 14 MD
29602 KC Twisters 17-1 1419 6-3 55% 17 MO
29603 Festus Fire 17-Pink 1419 15-16 48% 17 MO
29604 clubSAV 14-Local blue 1419 5-7 42% 14 GA
29605 Lake Country Storm 12 1419 7-6 50% 12 VA
29606 Club V South 12 1419 0-6 0% 12 UT
29607 DSV 18-1 1419 3-3 50% 18 AZ
29608 Wrecking Crew 13-2 1419 1-3 20% 13 TX
29609 Elite Volleyball Clubs 12-1 1419 2-2 50% 12 KY
29610 BVC 14-2 regional-robert 1419 13-15 46% 14 AL
29611 Red Viper 16-Red 1419 0-2 0% 16 CO
29612 WOVC 14-1 1419 3-4 43% 14 FL
29613 Spikers 17-1 1419 2-3 40% 17 KS
29614 North Point 13-Elite 1419 16-19 39% 13 TX
29615 Empower 18-National blue 1419 23-22 51% 18 CA
29616 Utah Ice 18 Utah Ice Keysha 1419 1-6 14% 18 UT
29617 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 12-1 1419 0-4 0% 12 KS
29618 CEVC 18 Regional 1419 15-15 45% 18 NY
29619 ID ONE 16-Melba 1419 5-7 42% 16 ID
29620 Cutthroat 16-2 1419 9-8 47% 16 MT
29621 Apex NW 14-Ascent 1419 1-3 25% 14 WA
29622 SSWolfpack 15-Whitewolves 1419 7-9 29% 15 MA
29623 EVC 13 Select 1419 28-23 55% 13 IL
29624 LES 12-Storm 1419 7-8 44% 12 NY
29625 Alpha Omega 13-Regional 1419 5-10 33% 13 MO
29626 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-3 1419 2-4 33% 13 KS
29627 HP Illinois 13-1 future 1419 10-12 43% 13 MO
29628 Spa City 12-Coral 1419 16-19 46% 12 NY
29629 Houston Stars Red 11 1419 0-2 0% 11 TX
29630 Piedmont VBC 17 NIKE 1419 23-34 40% 17 NC
29631 West TN Elite 17 C3 (WTE) 18-1 1419 2-3 40% 17
29632 purple storm 11-1 1419 1-3 20% 11 AL
29633 307 Impact Impact 10 1419 9-8 53% 10 WY
29634 Volley Pro 15-1 1419 1-6 14% 15 NV
29635 Mahoning Valley Premier VBC 16-Silver 1419 6-7 46% 16 OH
29636 The EDGE 14 White (RM) 1419 22-25 47% 14 CO
29637 Essex 15-South 1419 2-3 40% 15 NJ
29638 Mem Metro 13-Trvl blk 1419 14-12 54% 13 TN
29639 CWSG 15-1 1419 2-4 33% 15 HI
29640 Next Level 15-Lindsey 1419 10-7 59% 15 MI
29641 Bemidji 16-Hayli 1419 5-3 63% 16 ND
29642 REFINE 13 Refine Roussell (SO) 1419 1-6 11% 13 AL
29643 AVA Volleyball Club 17-Elite 1419 8-7 53% 17 MA
29644 Princeton 16-1 national 1419 7-17 29% 16 NJ
29645 Liga Lomanview 14 Lomanview Eddie (PU) 1419 2-5 29% 14 PR
29646 NFC 14-1 1419 15-15 50% 14 FL
29647 BAVC 17-1 1419 6-6 50% 17 CA
29648 757 13-Teal 1419 23-29 44% 13 VA
29649 TNVBC 13 1419 14-19 42% 13 CA
29650 RVJ 13 Elite 1419 17-27 39% 13 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.