2025-2026 Season — Page 593 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29601 | MDJRS 14-Elite yellow | 1419 | 23-32 | 40% | 14 | MD |
| 29602 | KC Twisters 17-1 | 1419 | 6-3 | 55% | 17 | MO |
| 29603 | Festus Fire 17-Pink | 1419 | 15-16 | 48% | 17 | MO |
| 29604 | clubSAV 14-Local blue | 1419 | 5-7 | 42% | 14 | GA |
| 29605 | Lake Country Storm 12 | 1419 | 7-6 | 50% | 12 | VA |
| 29606 | Club V South 12 | 1419 | 0-6 | 0% | 12 | UT |
| 29607 | DSV 18-1 | 1419 | 3-3 | 50% | 18 | AZ |
| 29608 | Wrecking Crew 13-2 | 1419 | 1-3 | 20% | 13 | TX |
| 29609 | Elite Volleyball Clubs 12-1 | 1419 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | KY |
| 29610 | BVC 14-2 regional-robert | 1419 | 13-15 | 46% | 14 | AL |
| 29611 | Red Viper 16-Red | 1419 | 0-2 | 0% | 16 | CO |
| 29612 | WOVC 14-1 | 1419 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | FL |
| 29613 | Spikers 17-1 | 1419 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | KS |
| 29614 | North Point 13-Elite | 1419 | 16-19 | 39% | 13 | TX |
| 29615 | Empower 18-National blue | 1419 | 23-22 | 51% | 18 | CA |
| 29616 | Utah Ice 18 Utah Ice Keysha | 1419 | 1-6 | 14% | 18 | UT |
| 29617 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1419 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | KS |
| 29618 | CEVC 18 Regional | 1419 | 15-15 | 45% | 18 | NY |
| 29619 | ID ONE 16-Melba | 1419 | 5-7 | 42% | 16 | ID |
| 29620 | Cutthroat 16-2 | 1419 | 9-8 | 47% | 16 | MT |
| 29621 | Apex NW 14-Ascent | 1419 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | WA |
| 29622 | SSWolfpack 15-Whitewolves | 1419 | 7-9 | 29% | 15 | MA |
| 29623 | EVC 13 Select | 1419 | 28-23 | 55% | 13 | IL |
| 29624 | LES 12-Storm | 1419 | 7-8 | 44% | 12 | NY |
| 29625 | Alpha Omega 13-Regional | 1419 | 5-10 | 33% | 13 | MO |
| 29626 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-3 | 1419 | 2-4 | 33% | 13 | KS |
| 29627 | HP Illinois 13-1 future | 1419 | 10-12 | 43% | 13 | MO |
| 29628 | Spa City 12-Coral | 1419 | 16-19 | 46% | 12 | NY |
| 29629 | Houston Stars Red 11 | 1419 | 0-2 | 0% | 11 | TX |
| 29630 | Piedmont VBC 17 NIKE | 1419 | 23-34 | 40% | 17 | NC |
| 29631 | West TN Elite 17 C3 (WTE) 18-1 | 1419 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | |
| 29632 | purple storm 11-1 | 1419 | 1-3 | 20% | 11 | AL |
| 29633 | 307 Impact Impact 10 | 1419 | 9-8 | 53% | 10 | WY |
| 29634 | Volley Pro 15-1 | 1419 | 1-6 | 14% | 15 | NV |
| 29635 | Mahoning Valley Premier VBC 16-Silver | 1419 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | OH |
| 29636 | The EDGE 14 White (RM) | 1419 | 22-25 | 47% | 14 | CO |
| 29637 | Essex 15-South | 1419 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | NJ |
| 29638 | Mem Metro 13-Trvl blk | 1419 | 14-12 | 54% | 13 | TN |
| 29639 | CWSG 15-1 | 1419 | 2-4 | 33% | 15 | HI |
| 29640 | Next Level 15-Lindsey | 1419 | 10-7 | 59% | 15 | MI |
| 29641 | Bemidji 16-Hayli | 1419 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | ND |
| 29642 | REFINE 13 Refine Roussell (SO) | 1419 | 1-6 | 11% | 13 | AL |
| 29643 | AVA Volleyball Club 17-Elite | 1419 | 8-7 | 53% | 17 | MA |
| 29644 | Princeton 16-1 national | 1419 | 7-17 | 29% | 16 | NJ |
| 29645 | Liga Lomanview 14 Lomanview Eddie (PU) | 1419 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | PR |
| 29646 | NFC 14-1 | 1419 | 15-15 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 29647 | BAVC 17-1 | 1419 | 6-6 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 29648 | 757 13-Teal | 1419 | 23-29 | 44% | 13 | VA |
| 29649 | TNVBC 13 | 1419 | 14-19 | 42% | 13 | CA |
| 29650 | RVJ 13 Elite | 1419 | 17-27 | 39% | 13 | VA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.