Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 592 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29551 TVO 13-Smash 1419 12-12 48% 13 MI
29552 SWMNVB 14-2 1419 15-21 42% 14 MN
29553 Gunners VBC 16 Gunners Fierce 1419 26-19 58% 16 AZ
29554 Club North Volleyball KC 16-1 1419 0-4 0% 16 MO
29555 City Juniors 12-White 1419 4-7 31% 12 TX
29556 Alamo 16-Gold 2 1419 14-27 33% 16 TX
29557 UP North Jr's MQT 14-Grey 1419 4-5 44% 14 WI
29558 Alliance Nashville 13-1 1419 6-9 40% 13 TN
29559 TEJAS 16-Red kellsi 1419 6-13 27% 16 TX
29560 AZ EVJ 16 Navy 1419 21-26 45% 16 AZ
29561 San Antonio Hidden Talent 16 San Antonio Hidden Talent (LS) 1419 3-6 33% 16 TX
29562 ACCV 16-Bk el travels 1419 6-10 30% 16 TX
29563 NNJ 14 Katy 1419 20-21 49% 14 NV
29564 Madison Elite 12-White 1419 3-3 50% 12 WI
29565 Spire VC 17-Getz 1419 6-14 30% 17 OH
29566 Midwest Intensity VBC 17 1419 14-13 48% 17 MO
29567 RCVC 13-N 1419 5-10 33% 13 TN
29568 Thunder 16 1419 20-17 51% 16 MO
29569 Rhythm 11 Jess 1419 13-22 35% 11 TN
29570 HJV 11-Molten 1419 3-8 27% 11 TX
29571 CINCY EAST 11-2 blue 1419 4-7 36% 11 OH
29572 Attack VBC 14-Elite 1419 20-20 50% 14 MI
29573 Velocity 219 12-Jas 1419 3-7 30% 12 IN
29574 Cangrejeras 13-Miriam 1419 6-6 50% 13 PR
29575 AZ REV 13-Green 1419 18-31 37% 13 AZ
29576 L2 Volleyball Club 14-Noho 1419 3-4 43% 14 MI
29577 Jellys 17Black 1419 19-21 48% 17 FL
29578 LEGACY 13-State chris 1419 1-3 25% 13 NY
29579 TCVBC 13-1 1419 21-31 38% 13 NY
29580 Dunes 14-Orange 1419 1-3 25% 14 IN
29581 TrujilloVoli Stepany 17 1419 4-7 36% 17 PR
29582 Club Fusion 14-Heat 1419 6-5 55% 14 IL
29583 NKYVC 10-2 tide 1419 5-10 33% 10 KY
29584 EVA 12-White 1419 10-10 50% 12 AR
29585 EC Power KOP 15-Black 1419 17-40 30% 15 PA
29586 Vision 13 Nick 1419 1-3 25% 13 GA
29587 Alpha Omega Volleyball 15-3 1419 5-3 31% 15 MO
29588 Stingers 16 1419 2-5 25% 16 IA
29589 GCVC 15-Red 1419 11-18 38% 15 OH
29590 Sky High 16-Giustino - spr 1419 9-9 50% 16 IL
29591 BCS Skyline H 14 Premier 1419 4-10 29% 14 TX
29592 OK Elite 14-Black 1419 0-2 0% 14 OK
29593 OCR 16 Maroon 1419 12-14 46% 16 CA
29594 Chisholm 17-1 1419 11-15 42% 17 MN
29595 Reign 16-Black 1419 28-28 47% 16 FL
29596 Top Flight 12-Kappa sp 1419 0-6 0% 12 IL
29597 Vista 12-Blue 1419 4-4 50% 12 NV
29598 Champion 18-Z purple 1419 10-13 43% 18 NC
29599 Eastlake 16-Denise 1419 3-4 43% 16 CA
29600 Starlings S-N-P 16-Coach jessica 1419 4-11 27% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.