2025-2026 Season — Page 588 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29351 | Manhattan Mayhem 16-2 | 1421 | 0-4 | 0% | 16 | KS |
| 29352 | Hana Hou 18 | 1421 | 5-9 | 29% | 18 | HI |
| 29353 | Junior Jays 13 | 1421 | 3-6 | 33% | 13 | MN |
| 29354 | Titus Volleyball Club 16 TVC Elite | 1421 | 1-3 | 25% | 16 | |
| 29355 | Tenacity 14 Regional | 1421 | 21-21 | 50% | 14 | TN |
| 29356 | MPCG-FS 16-1 | 1421 | 2-5 | 22% | 16 | ND |
| 29357 | IHT Elite 16-2 | 1421 | 10-12 | 45% | 16 | ND |
| 29358 | RVC 16-Allen ryan | 1421 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | UT |
| 29359 | OVVC 16-Aqua | 1421 | 7-10 | 41% | 16 | OH |
| 29360 | Midwest Penguins 13-R | 1421 | 23-25 | 48% | 13 | WI |
| 29361 | VPS 10-1 | 1421 | 3-4 | 43% | 10 | PR |
| 29362 | LPA 14-Black | 1421 | 0-2 | 0% | 14 | MN |
| 29363 | Club Tonka 14-2 | 1421 | 21-19 | 53% | 14 | MN |
| 29364 | Surge 12-Black | 1421 | 2-6 | 22% | 12 | PA |
| 29365 | Ghost Elite 14 | 1421 | 21-12 | 60% | 14 | WY |
| 29366 | Lady Raiders 12-Gold | 1421 | 10-14 | 42% | 12 | IL |
| 29367 | NVA 16-Future narces | 1421 | 1-2 | 33% | 16 | FL |
| 29368 | Crush 13-1 malolo | 1421 | 12-13 | 46% | 13 | GA |
| 29369 | Dig Deep 16-Platinum | 1421 | 12-31 | 28% | 16 | NH |
| 29370 | Battle 17 | 1421 | 30-29 | 49% | 17 | VA |
| 29371 | SC Elite 13-White-jen | 1421 | 13-25 | 34% | 13 | SC |
| 29372 | Indians 13 | 1421 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | PR |
| 29373 | STL Crossfire 12 R1 | 1421 | 13-21 | 38% | 12 | MO |
| 29374 | Mt. Hood 17-1 timberline | 1421 | 16-24 | 40% | 17 | OR |
| 29375 | NWVC Wolves 16-2 | 1421 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | AB |
| 29376 | JM 12 Silver | 1421 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 29377 | WVBA 11-Regional black | 1421 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | FL |
| 29378 | Konza Volleyball Club 17-2 | 1421 | 2-5 | 29% | 17 | KS |
| 29379 | Fusion 12-Maddie | 1421 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | UT |
| 29380 | SynVBC 15-1 | 1421 | 9-12 | 43% | 15 | NY |
| 29381 | Legend 11 | 1421 | 19-37 | 34% | 11 | CA |
| 29382 | Phoenix 14-Yellow | 1421 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | OH |
| 29383 | MVP 14-Yellow | 1421 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | OH |
| 29384 | NVA 11-Futuro alice | 1421 | 14-11 | 56% | 11 | FL |
| 29385 | Radiate 17-Gold | 1421 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | UT |
| 29386 | Idaho LUV 14-Liz | 1421 | 6-18 | 24% | 14 | ID |
| 29387 | Velocity 14-Red 2 | 1421 | 12-12 | 48% | 14 | MS |
| 29388 | CR Westside 14 | 1421 | 7-8 | 39% | 14 | IA |
| 29389 | Mighty Mo 12-Hillman | 1421 | 12-10 | 48% | 12 | MT |
| 29390 | NJVBC 14-Inferno | 1421 | 7-7 | 50% | 14 | NJ |
| 29391 | Hana Hou Perlas 14 | 1421 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | HI |
| 29392 | 1 Flight VBC 15-2 | 1421 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | OR |
| 29393 | LTVC 17-2 | 1421 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | NV |
| 29394 | Synergy 17 Mercury | 1421 | 13-21 | 38% | 17 | PA |
| 29395 | Northridge 12-Jones | 1421 | 2-4 | 33% | 12 | IN |
| 29396 | FLIGHT 14-Kenzie | 1421 | 10-10 | 48% | 14 | MI |
| 29397 | FAUCONS 16-Black | 1421 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | MA |
| 29398 | Forza1 Volleyball North 16-National black | 1421 | 12-15 | 44% | 16 | CA |
| 29399 | Evolution 15-Red | 1421 | 7-14 | 29% | 15 | IA |
| 29400 | Voltage 16 | 1421 | 5-9 | 33% | 16 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.