Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 588 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29351 Manhattan Mayhem 16-2 1421 0-4 0% 16 KS
29352 Hana Hou 18 1421 5-9 29% 18 HI
29353 Junior Jays 13 1421 3-6 33% 13 MN
29354 Titus Volleyball Club 16 TVC Elite 1421 1-3 25% 16
29355 Tenacity 14 Regional 1421 21-21 50% 14 TN
29356 MPCG-FS 16-1 1421 2-5 22% 16 ND
29357 IHT Elite 16-2 1421 10-12 45% 16 ND
29358 RVC 16-Allen ryan 1421 2-5 29% 16 UT
29359 OVVC 16-Aqua 1421 7-10 41% 16 OH
29360 Midwest Penguins 13-R 1421 23-25 48% 13 WI
29361 VPS 10-1 1421 3-4 43% 10 PR
29362 LPA 14-Black 1421 0-2 0% 14 MN
29363 Club Tonka 14-2 1421 21-19 53% 14 MN
29364 Surge 12-Black 1421 2-6 22% 12 PA
29365 Ghost Elite 14 1421 21-12 60% 14 WY
29366 Lady Raiders 12-Gold 1421 10-14 42% 12 IL
29367 NVA 16-Future narces 1421 1-2 33% 16 FL
29368 Crush 13-1 malolo 1421 12-13 46% 13 GA
29369 Dig Deep 16-Platinum 1421 12-31 28% 16 NH
29370 Battle 17 1421 30-29 49% 17 VA
29371 SC Elite 13-White-jen 1421 13-25 34% 13 SC
29372 Indians 13 1421 2-3 40% 13 PR
29373 STL Crossfire 12 R1 1421 13-21 38% 12 MO
29374 Mt. Hood 17-1 timberline 1421 16-24 40% 17 OR
29375 NWVC Wolves 16-2 1421 3-4 43% 16 AB
29376 JM 12 Silver 1421 0-2 0% 12 TX
29377 WVBA 11-Regional black 1421 1-3 25% 11 FL
29378 Konza Volleyball Club 17-2 1421 2-5 29% 17 KS
29379 Fusion 12-Maddie 1421 1-2 33% 12 UT
29380 SynVBC 15-1 1421 9-12 43% 15 NY
29381 Legend 11 1421 19-37 34% 11 CA
29382 Phoenix 14-Yellow 1421 1-3 25% 14 OH
29383 MVP 14-Yellow 1421 2-3 40% 14 OH
29384 NVA 11-Futuro alice 1421 14-11 56% 11 FL
29385 Radiate 17-Gold 1421 4-3 57% 17 UT
29386 Idaho LUV 14-Liz 1421 6-18 24% 14 ID
29387 Velocity 14-Red 2 1421 12-12 48% 14 MS
29388 CR Westside 14 1421 7-8 39% 14 IA
29389 Mighty Mo 12-Hillman 1421 12-10 48% 12 MT
29390 NJVBC 14-Inferno 1421 7-7 50% 14 NJ
29391 Hana Hou Perlas 14 1421 2-3 40% 14 HI
29392 1 Flight VBC 15-2 1421 2-5 29% 15 OR
29393 LTVC 17-2 1421 2-3 40% 17 NV
29394 Synergy 17 Mercury 1421 13-21 38% 17 PA
29395 Northridge 12-Jones 1421 2-4 33% 12 IN
29396 FLIGHT 14-Kenzie 1421 10-10 48% 14 MI
29397 FAUCONS 16-Black 1421 3-5 38% 16 MA
29398 Forza1 Volleyball North 16-National black 1421 12-15 44% 16 CA
29399 Evolution 15-Red 1421 7-14 29% 15 IA
29400 Voltage 16 1421 5-9 33% 16 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.