2025-2026 Season — Page 589 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29401 | JVA 12-Blue | 1421 | 3-5 | 38% | 12 | FL |
| 29402 | STL Crossfire 17 R2 | 1421 | 18-18 | 49% | 17 | MO |
| 29403 | NW Force 10-1 | 1421 | 1-2 | 20% | 10 | MO |
| 29404 | Belle Plaine 16-2 | 1421 | 5-7 | 42% | 16 | MN |
| 29405 | Athletic Empire 16 | 1421 | 14-14 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 29406 | Tsunami 15-1e taylor | 1421 | 23-28 | 45% | 15 | GA |
| 29407 | Rapid Fire 17-Purple | 1421 | 9-11 | 45% | 17 | IL |
| 29408 | KVA Kako'o VBA 15-Kaci | 1421 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | NV |
| 29409 | Burns VBC 14-1 | 1421 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | ID |
| 29410 | Southside Swarm VBC 14-1 | 1421 | 5-2 | 63% | 14 | MO |
| 29411 | PCVBC 16-Tnt | 1421 | 8-8 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 29412 | Countdown 12-National | 1421 | 25-19 | 57% | 12 | FL |
| 29413 | A5 West 16-3 | 1421 | 7-8 | 47% | 16 | GA |
| 29414 | Starlings Cudahy 16-S doxa | 1421 | 12-9 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 29415 | AVC 16-Red | 1421 | 17-17 | 43% | 16 | PA |
| 29416 | G3VB 16-3 | 1421 | 26-24 | 52% | 16 | OR |
| 29417 | Momentum One 18-Tsunami | 1421 | 22-21 | 51% | 18 | WA |
| 29418 | PCVBC 13 LeCount | 1421 | 7-7 | 50% | 13 | OH |
| 29419 | Elite Volleyball Clubs 11-1 | 1421 | 3-3 | 50% | 11 | KY |
| 29420 | NKJV 12-Black | 1421 | 12-14 | 46% | 12 | KY |
| 29421 | AVBC 16-National red | 1421 | 28-33 | 46% | 16 | MI |
| 29422 | ACVC 13 | 1421 | 11-13 | 46% | 13 | CA |
| 29423 | SPARKS VBC 13-Red | 1421 | 21-28 | 43% | 13 | PA |
| 29424 | Barracuda 15-Sean | 1421 | 15-17 | 47% | 15 | NC |
| 29425 | NPJO 12-Black | 1421 | 8-9 | 47% | 12 | MN |
| 29426 | Midwest United 16-Blue | 1421 | 33-34 | 49% | 16 | MN |
| 29427 | Academy 12-red | 1421 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | IL |
| 29428 | Precision Volleyball Academy 12 Precision Starzs (OV) | 1421 | 5-8 | 38% | 12 | OH |
| 29429 | Orillia Suns 18 18U Blaze | 1421 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | |
| 29430 | Image 16-National | 1421 | 16-21 | 38% | 16 | |
| 29431 | Evaolve 16-Black | 1421 | 1-3 | 20% | 16 | |
| 29432 | SOMD 13-Black | 1421 | 11-13 | 37% | 13 | MD |
| 29433 | BAVC 10-1 royals | 1420 | 18-23 | 41% | 10 | OK |
| 29434 | Lex United 13-Black | 1420 | 42-36 | 54% | 13 | KY |
| 29435 | LS Thunder 11-White | 1420 | 3-5 | 25% | 11 | |
| 29436 | Image 13-Red | 1420 | 13-25 | 31% | 13 | |
| 29437 | Preds 14-Girls eclipse | 1420 | 0-5 | 0% | 14 | OH |
| 29438 | Cincy Crush 14-3 | 1420 | 15-20 | 43% | 14 | OH |
| 29439 | HPRIME 12-Pink | 1420 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | TX |
| 29440 | Sting 13-S | 1420 | 9-13 | 41% | 13 | AR |
| 29441 | i9 Sports 13 | 1420 | 1-2 | 25% | 13 | FL |
| 29442 | GCVA 12-Black | 1420 | 3-5 | 38% | 12 | TX |
| 29443 | CE Stars 13-S | 1420 | 17-25 | 40% | 13 | IN |
| 29444 | Academy 13-R condors | 1420 | 15-26 | 37% | 13 | IN |
| 29445 | HP 16-2 | 1420 | 13-47 | 22% | 16 | MI |
| 29446 | MWVC 13-Roberto | 1420 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | PR |
| 29447 | River City Storm 15-1 | 1420 | 25-26 | 49% | 15 | KY |
| 29448 | Capital Region Volleyball Club 18-1 eagles | 1420 | 7-23 | 23% | 18 | NH |
| 29449 | DCVB White 15-1 | 1420 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | NC |
| 29450 | Tstreet SN 18-Doug | 1420 | 16-12 | 57% | 18 | NV |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.