Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 587 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29301 Fusion 15-Titanium 1422 27-37 42% 15 CA
29302 MN Blizzard 14-1 1422 2-2 50% 14 MN
29303 Chicago Elite 13-Force 1422 17-15 53% 13 IL
29304 BSVBC 12 Silver 1422 11-16 39% 12 IL
29305 SA Magic 14 GOLD 1422 15-20 43% 14 TX
29306 Rival 13-Silver 1422 1-3 25% 13 NY
29307 AEV 14 Regional 1422 15-16 48% 14 TX
29308 OPVC 10-Moe 1422 1-3 25% 10 OH
29309 RAVC 14-Gold 1422 4-6 40% 14 NC
29310 SMASH 12-Maroon force 1422 7-11 39% 12 MO
29311 Uno Girls 16-Blue 1422 16-18 47% 16 IL
29312 Evolution 13-Red 1422 5-9 36% 13 IA
29313 NEVA 18-Black lexi 1422 15-14 48% 18 UT
29314 KC Vipers 15-1 black 1422 5-7 42% 15 TX
29315 Crossfire 14-Yellow 1422 4-6 40% 14 MN
29316 NPJ Seattle 14-Orange 1422 21-36 37% 14 WA
29317 Panorama Juniors 14 1422 1-4 20% 14 WA
29318 Instinct VBC 14-Wild black 1422 1-6 14% 14 MN
29319 Kaboom 14-S 1422 11-18 37% 14 MN
29320 208 15-White 1422 9-18 33% 15 ID
29321 Ichiban 14-3 christie/roxie 1422 2-3 40% 14 GA
29322 NPJ Seattle 14-White 1422 24-34 41% 14 WA
29323 Infinity 14-White 1422 12-12 50% 14 OH
29324 WTX Blazers 11-Black 1422 2-7 22% 11 TX
29325 Club 1890 18-1 1422 2-2 50% 18 OH
29326 SC Rockstar 17-Jo 1422 11-17 39% 17 CA
29327 Effingham Elite 13-R 1422 5-5 50% 13 NY
29328 S-N-P 16-Coach yasmeen 1421 1-6 14% 16 CA
29329 Shout 14-1 1421 7-18 28% 14 OR
29330 NPJ Portland 14-White 1421 29-27 52% 14 OR
29331 Gold Cal Jrs 14-Air 1421 1-6 14% 14 NV
29332 VEVA Impact 13-Black 1421 18-40 31% 13 PA
29333 Lockdown VBC 17-Raptors 1421 20-20 50% 17 MA
29334 ATHENA VB 14-8 opal regional 1421 16-17 48% 14 OR
29335 VCN Lincoln 15-Adidas 1421 15-9 63% 15 NE
29336 Juggernaut 11-Regional 1 1421 18-20 47% 11 CO
29337 BEV 16-Elite 1421 19-25 43% 16 NY
29338 Aus Velocity 14-6 topaz 1421 18-17 50% 14 TX
29339 TAV Houston 14-Royal 1421 13-18 39% 14 TX
29340 Spiketown Central 14-Blue 1421 5-8 38% 14 WI
29341 Tribe 15-Regional blue 1421 18-20 47% 15 FL
29342 ArkJrs. MH 14-S black 1421 2-2 50% 14 AR
29343 KIVA 14-Victoria 1421 0-2 0% 14 KY
29344 MVVC 15-Pink 1421 18-29 38% 15 CA
29345 IconVBC 15-Elite mariela 1421 16-18 47% 15 CA
29346 Vibe VBC 15-3 1421 1-6 14% 15 CA
29347 Center Stars 11 1421 1-3 25% 11 WI
29348 BPR 12-1 1421 4-7 36% 12 PR
29349 SC Rockstar 14-Ghie 1421 18-34 35% 14 CA
29350 Sunset West 12-Sapphires 1421 1-3 20% 12 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.