2025-2026 Season — Page 584 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29151 | Hot Shotz 18-Black | 1423 | 29-22 | 57% | 18 | WY |
| 29152 | Prime X Volleyball 14-Skyline | 1423 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 29153 | DuPage Elite SS 14-Silver | 1423 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | IL |
| 29154 | 212 14-1 | 1423 | 20-19 | 48% | 14 | TX |
| 29155 | CLVC 11-Black | 1423 | 1-4 | 20% | 11 | NC |
| 29156 | CSDP Volleyball Club 10-1 | 1423 | 3-2 | 43% | 10 | NV |
| 29157 | Intensity 12 | 1423 | 13-19 | 41% | 12 | KY |
| 29158 | TriCounty ATTACK 13-2 | 1423 | 10-7 | 56% | 13 | NY |
| 29159 | LHV Girls 14-4 triumph | 1423 | 14-18 | 44% | 14 | MA |
| 29160 | The HBC 13-Black | 1423 | 13-20 | 39% | 13 | CA |
| 29161 | South Winn 10-1 | 1423 | 0-3 | 0% | 10 | MN |
| 29162 | APVBC 13-1 | 1423 | 5-6 | 45% | 13 | IN |
| 29163 | Team Pineapple 13-Green | 1423 | 20-29 | 41% | 13 | IN |
| 29164 | 928Impact 14-Black | 1423 | 11-12 | 48% | 14 | AZ |
| 29165 | NIVA 13 SILVER | 1423 | 37-32 | 54% | 13 | IN |
| 29166 | DUNES 13-Heat | 1423 | 2-4 | 33% | 13 | IN |
| 29167 | MAVS KC 17-Premier | 1423 | 6-15 | 29% | 17 | KS |
| 29168 | ID Crush 17-Vinson | 1423 | 21-34 | 38% | 17 | ID |
| 29169 | Downstate 17-Red | 1423 | 35-40 | 47% | 17 | NY |
| 29170 | Elevate 15-Pounce squad | 1423 | 31-31 | 50% | 15 | WI |
| 29171 | PCVBC 18 Menninger | 1423 | 12-12 | 50% | 18 | OH |
| 29172 | Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-3 | 1423 | 5-8 | 29% | 16 | MO |
| 29173 | Xcel VB 13-2 navy | 1423 | 9-14 | 38% | 13 | TX |
| 29174 | Houston Hazard 11-Black | 1423 | 6-9 | 40% | 11 | TX |
| 29175 | Renaissance 13-Gray | 1423 | 3-6 | 23% | 13 | PA |
| 29176 | ECJVC 14-Select james | 1423 | 10-12 | 45% | 14 | NC |
| 29177 | Quicksets VBC 18-2 | 1423 | 11-14 | 44% | 18 | HI |
| 29178 | 360 Volleyball Club 17 17 Kaos White | 1423 | 4-5 | 44% | 17 | TX |
| 29179 | HO'OPA 14-Jessica | 1423 | 1-3 | 20% | 14 | HI |
| 29180 | Monti Club JO 13-1 | 1423 | 10-18 | 34% | 13 | MN |
| 29181 | SLAM 15-R grey | 1423 | 15-16 | 48% | 15 | MA |
| 29182 | Black Hills Juniors 12-White | 1423 | 0-4 | 0% | 12 | WY |
| 29183 | Lanier 15-Reg. natalie | 1423 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | GA |
| 29184 | MVA 17 Oscar | 1423 | 42-30 | 58% | 17 | FL |
| 29185 | Avalanche Volleyball Club 16 Avalanche Kyle | 1423 | 2-4 | 33% | 16 | MI |
| 29186 | JAGS 15-1 | 1423 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | MN |
| 29187 | CVC 16 SILVER | 1423 | 17-30 | 36% | 16 | OH |
| 29188 | Little Red Volleyball Club 14 Little Red Flame (XL) (13) | 1423 | 5-6 | 38% | 14 | NY |
| 29189 | IVBA SOAR 13 REN | 1423 | 13-21 | 38% | 13 | MS |
| 29190 | CFV 12 | 1423 | 9-15 | 38% | 12 | WI |
| 29191 | SVC Girls 15-1 | 1423 | 38-58 | 39% | 15 | NY |
| 29192 | ACT 15-Lexy | 1423 | 21-31 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 29193 | Power 12-Purple | 1423 | 14-18 | 40% | 12 | TX |
| 29194 | EEVC 15-S gold | 1423 | 12-21 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 29195 | Academy 11-E force | 1423 | 16-28 | 36% | 11 | IN |
| 29196 | Atlanta Extreme 15 Ray | 1423 | 17-32 | 34% | 15 | GA |
| 29197 | Mizuno Club North Volleyball 15-2 | 1423 | 2-3 | 33% | 15 | MO |
| 29198 | SVC 16-Leone | 1423 | 5-10 | 33% | 16 | CO |
| 29199 | AVA 15-V | 1423 | 9-9 | 47% | 15 | OH |
| 29200 | Panther Girls 16-White | 1423 | 16-17 | 48% | 16 | CO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.