Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 584 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29151 Hot Shotz 18-Black 1423 29-22 57% 18 WY
29152 Prime X Volleyball 14-Skyline 1423 3-4 43% 14 TX
29153 DuPage Elite SS 14-Silver 1423 2-3 40% 14 IL
29154 212 14-1 1423 20-19 48% 14 TX
29155 CLVC 11-Black 1423 1-4 20% 11 NC
29156 CSDP Volleyball Club 10-1 1423 3-2 43% 10 NV
29157 Intensity 12 1423 13-19 41% 12 KY
29158 TriCounty ATTACK 13-2 1423 10-7 56% 13 NY
29159 LHV Girls 14-4 triumph 1423 14-18 44% 14 MA
29160 The HBC 13-Black 1423 13-20 39% 13 CA
29161 South Winn 10-1 1423 0-3 0% 10 MN
29162 APVBC 13-1 1423 5-6 45% 13 IN
29163 Team Pineapple 13-Green 1423 20-29 41% 13 IN
29164 928Impact 14-Black 1423 11-12 48% 14 AZ
29165 NIVA 13 SILVER 1423 37-32 54% 13 IN
29166 DUNES 13-Heat 1423 2-4 33% 13 IN
29167 MAVS KC 17-Premier 1423 6-15 29% 17 KS
29168 ID Crush 17-Vinson 1423 21-34 38% 17 ID
29169 Downstate 17-Red 1423 35-40 47% 17 NY
29170 Elevate 15-Pounce squad 1423 31-31 50% 15 WI
29171 PCVBC 18 Menninger 1423 12-12 50% 18 OH
29172 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-3 1423 5-8 29% 16 MO
29173 Xcel VB 13-2 navy 1423 9-14 38% 13 TX
29174 Houston Hazard 11-Black 1423 6-9 40% 11 TX
29175 Renaissance 13-Gray 1423 3-6 23% 13 PA
29176 ECJVC 14-Select james 1423 10-12 45% 14 NC
29177 Quicksets VBC 18-2 1423 11-14 44% 18 HI
29178 360 Volleyball Club 17 17 Kaos White 1423 4-5 44% 17 TX
29179 HO'OPA 14-Jessica 1423 1-3 20% 14 HI
29180 Monti Club JO 13-1 1423 10-18 34% 13 MN
29181 SLAM 15-R grey 1423 15-16 48% 15 MA
29182 Black Hills Juniors 12-White 1423 0-4 0% 12 WY
29183 Lanier 15-Reg. natalie 1423 2-3 40% 15 GA
29184 MVA 17 Oscar 1423 42-30 58% 17 FL
29185 Avalanche Volleyball Club 16 Avalanche Kyle 1423 2-4 33% 16 MI
29186 JAGS 15-1 1423 2-3 40% 15 MN
29187 CVC 16 SILVER 1423 17-30 36% 16 OH
29188 Little Red Volleyball Club 14 Little Red Flame (XL) (13) 1423 5-6 38% 14 NY
29189 IVBA SOAR 13 REN 1423 13-21 38% 13 MS
29190 CFV 12 1423 9-15 38% 12 WI
29191 SVC Girls 15-1 1423 38-58 39% 15 NY
29192 ACT 15-Lexy 1423 21-31 40% 15 CA
29193 Power 12-Purple 1423 14-18 40% 12 TX
29194 EEVC 15-S gold 1423 12-21 36% 15 CA
29195 Academy 11-E force 1423 16-28 36% 11 IN
29196 Atlanta Extreme 15 Ray 1423 17-32 34% 15 GA
29197 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 15-2 1423 2-3 33% 15 MO
29198 SVC 16-Leone 1423 5-10 33% 16 CO
29199 AVA 15-V 1423 9-9 47% 15 OH
29200 Panther Girls 16-White 1423 16-17 48% 16 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.