Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 585 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29201 3D 17 1423 3-5 30% 17 IA
29202 NSTVB 13-Gloryyellow 1423 1-2 20% 13
29203 MAVA 17-Blue 1423 36-37 49% 17 KY
29204 Legacy 17-Elite south 1423 24-25 49% 17 MI
29205 WILD 15 1423 2-5 29% 15 ND
29206 Western Kansas Elite 16-1 1423 3-4 43% 16 KS
29207 Mem Metro 17-Elite red 1423 19-24 44% 17 TN
29208 DG Warriors 15-White 1423 9-11 45% 15 OH
29209 CVC 12-2 1423 18-21 46% 12 MN
29210 FUSION 13-White 1423 13-15 46% 13 PA
29211 Highlands 16-Black 1423 11-13 46% 16 MO
29212 TPV 13-White 1423 17-19 47% 13 TN
29213 Asphalt Green VBC 16-1 1423 3-4 43% 16 NY
29214 PO1NT 16-1 national 1423 27-21 56% 16 OH
29215 Anthem United 16-Redeemed 1423 20-16 56% 16 GA
29216 Wisconsin Blaze 16-White 1423 19-17 53% 16 WI
29217 NS 16 Stingrays 1423 25-24 51% 16 MI
29218 Rise 16-2 (MA) 1423 4-4 50% 16 MA
29219 K2 15-Frilled lizards 1423 17-24 41% 15 TN
29220 Liberty All-Stars 10 1423 0-3 0% 10 IA
29221 Space Needle Volleyball Foundation 12-Baden 1423 0-3 0% 12 WA
29222 Hemolele 16-S 1423 0-2 0% 16 HI
29223 BW HEAT 14-1 1423 2-6 22% 14 WI
29224 MV 12-Maroon 1423 1-2 25% 12 IA
29225 Asphalt Green VBC 15-White 1423 13-22 37% 15 NY
29226 Sanford Sports 12-Black 1423 10-17 37% 12 SD
29227 Elite 13-S 1423 12-14 46% 13 IL
29228 SNVF 16 VORTEX 1423 25-29 46% 16 WA
29229 CORE Girls 18-Platinum 1422 9-33 21% 18 NJ
29230 Aftershock 15-Yissel 1422 1-4 20% 15 CA
29231 Niagara Athletics Volleyball Club 16 Athletics AMBUSH 1422 2-3 40% 16
29232 Forge 15 1422 8-8 44% 15
29233 Thumb Coast Volleyball Club 16 Thumb Coast Volleyball 1422 10-11 48% 16
29234 TIV 16-National 1422 4-3 57% 16 TX
29235 Charleston VBC 13-1 1422 13-11 54% 13 SC
29236 SBVC Girls 17-Molten 1422 26-26 50% 17 CA
29237 IEV 14-Orange 1422 7-7 50% 14 FL
29238 Battle 18 1422 29-29 48% 18 VA
29239 Sky High Adidas 16-White 1422 29-32 48% 16 IL
29240 SSP Storm 16-Select 1422 28-32 47% 16 FL
29241 Sizzle Academy 13-N1 1422 22-27 45% 13 AZ
29242 Houston Hazard 13-White 1422 10-11 45% 13 TX
29243 CVC 14-Elite 1422 17-22 44% 14 KY
29244 Club Idaho 16-White 1422 6-8 43% 16 UT
29245 Premier Volleyball 17 Premier Shock (CH) 1422 10-11 43% 17 DE
29246 316VBC 18-1 1422 3-4 43% 18 KS
29247 FB Xpress 18 National 1422 15-22 41% 18 TX
29248 Midwest Intensity VBC 13 1422 12-15 41% 13 MO
29249 Blue Crush Volleyball Club- Snyder 16-R 1422 2-3 40% 16 OH
29250 SVCFL 13-Teal-2 1422 2-3 40% 13 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.