Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 583 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29101 LAVA 17-Rachael 1424 7-7 50% 17 NC
29102 OOB 15 Chriss M 1424 3-5 38% 15 NV
29103 AIVA Armstrong 14 1424 2-3 40% 14 PA
29104 Big Sky 14-Challenger 1424 24-25 49% 14 FL
29105 MVC 16-2 1424 4-7 36% 16 OH
29106 Rogue330 Volleyball Club 18 18R THUNDER (OV) 1424 10-9 53% 18
29107 NC Select 15 1424 4-5 44% 15 OH
29108 Cajun Coast Athletics 12 1424 4-9 29% 12 LA
29109 Lakas 13-Premier 1424 21-24 47% 13 CA
29110 SA DESTINATION 18-1 1424 14-20 39% 18 TX
29111 Reef 12-Regional 1424 13-17 43% 12 CA
29112 Banzai VBC 15-Power 1424 2-7 18% 15 NE
29113 LCVC 15-Black 1424 11-11 50% 15 IN
29114 Kali 13-F josé 1424 0-5 0% 13 PR
29115 Believe 18 Premier 1424 16-16 50% 18 CO
29116 St. James Rockers 14 1424 1-3 25% 14 MN
29117 OK Elevate 15-2 1424 18-20 45% 15 OK
29118 MiElite 16-Diamond west 1424 14-13 52% 16 MI
29119 Prime Time 10-Bunnies 1424 6-14 30% 10 IL
29120 WGVA 15-Red 1424 20-37 35% 15 GA
29121 Magnitude VBC 18-R 1423 31-28 53% 18 AZ
29122 757 14-J sydney 1423 2-3 40% 14 VA
29123 674 Manati 12-1 f tatiana 1423 1-3 25% 12 PR
29124 NLVA 16-Teri 1423 11-23 32% 16 CA
29125 AV 17-S 1423 16-18 47% 17 MN
29126 VORTEX VBC 17-1 national des 1423 2-13 13% 17 UT
29127 FeVA 18 1423 12-13 48% 18 WI
29128 Driven 11-Teal 1423 16-19 46% 11 FL
29129 Kaimana 18 1423 4-6 40% 18 HI
29130 Hutchinson 17-S 1423 3-3 50% 17 MN
29131 Stars 14-White 1423 10-8 50% 14 ND
29132 Rosemount Irish 12-3 1423 5-6 45% 12 MN
29133 Munciana 18-L bulldogs 1423 14-17 45% 18 IN
29134 Adrenaline 16-Sam 1423 18-30 37% 16 IA
29135 CleElite 14 GEANURACOS 1423 8-7 53% 14 OH
29136 KIVA 11 Margaret 1423 2-4 33% 11 KY
29137 KeAloha 17-1 cp 1423 14-21 40% 17 IN
29138 Elite 16-National 1423 2-13 13% 16 MO
29139 TC ELITE 17-J 1423 2-6 20% 17 LA
29140 Mighty Mo 16-1 1423 2-5 29% 16 MT
29141 NSSC 15-Pink 1423 19-23 41% 15 MO
29142 CVC 14-3 1423 14-16 45% 14 MN
29143 Kali 14-F joel 1423 0-5 0% 14 PR
29144 Shockwaves 14-1 1423 10-15 34% 14 MT
29145 NC Select 17-Christy 1423 3-3 50% 17 OH
29146 SoDak Juniors 14-Club 1423 8-15 35% 14 MN
29147 NUF 17-Black 1423 22-23 49% 17 IN
29148 KODA 15 Silver 1423 11-14 34% 15 NY
29149 ABBA 17-1 1423 8-10 44% 17 OH
29150 Titans 18 1423 9-9 50% 18 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.