Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 582 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29051 Vision 13-Exv gray 1424 17-19 44% 13 TX
29052 EVA 12-Grey 1424 9-11 45% 12 AR
29053 AHAVA 17 1424 10-12 45% 17 TN
29054 Potlatch Timber Volleyball Club 14-Gold 1424 6-7 46% 14 WA
29055 1W 16-Red 1424 8-9 47% 16 WI
29056 Nestor 16-Rachel 1424 1-6 14% 16 CA
29057 WGVBA 12 Royals 1424 11-9 52% 12 TX
29058 GSA 17-Black 1424 12-18 40% 17 NJ
29059 Viper 11-Luci 1424 7-4 64% 11 CA
29060 ATOMIC 11-Smack elite 1424 21-51 29% 11 AZ
29061 SVC 18-Aileen 1424 5-5 50% 18 CA
29062 Ace Volleyball Club 15 U15 Silver EP 1424 4-3 57% 15 CO
29063 ETE 16-S 1424 11-38 22% 16 TN
29064 SA Force 12-White 1424 11-12 48% 12 TX
29065 BAVC 18-National jo 1424 9-6 60% 18 CA
29066 DFVOS 14 Vipers 1424 12-8 60% 14 AZ
29067 NNVC 13-Rilee 1424 5-5 45% 13 NV
29068 L2 Volleyball Club 14 L2 241 (LK) 1424 17-18 49% 14 MI
29069 Next Level 14-Carlie 1424 7-7 50% 14 MI
29070 Ignite Volleyball Club 13-Elite 1424 14-19 42% 13 CA
29071 Top Flight 13-Zeta 1424 6-5 55% 13 IL
29072 Wisconsin Elite 14-Silver 1424 15-18 45% 14 WI
29073 KC Fire Volleyball 15-2 1424 4-6 40% 15 KS
29074 Shockwave VB Academy 15-4 1424 2-4 33% 15 KS
29075 Kairos 18-Blue 1424 3-5 38% 18 NC
29076 Tstreet Inland Empire 17-Ayana 1424 22-34 39% 17 CA
29077 ID Crush TF 11-Kate 1424 4-4 44% 11 ID
29078 Midwest Intensity VBC 15-Red 1424 13-14 45% 15 MO
29079 RADD Elite 18-Red 1424 6-11 35% 18 FL
29080 Red Storm 11-Reg. white 1424 6-7 46% 11 LA
29081 Central Lakes 18-2 1424 7-9 44% 18 MN
29082 Lebanon VBC 14-2 power 1424 8-12 40% 14 OR
29083 Attack VBC 17-Mizuno onyx 1424 12-13 48% 17 MI
29084 Border West 12-U 1424 0-2 0% 12 MN
29085 Legacy 13-Orange 1424 13-9 59% 13 MI
29086 Avoli 14-F carly 1424 1-2 33% 14 PR
29087 Mount Vernon 12-Maroon 1424 2-4 25% 12 IA
29088 KCV 15-#1 rikki 1424 2-4 33% 15 CA
29089 West E 17-Purple 1424 7-8 47% 17 PA
29090 FCA Cowlitz 18 1424 18-24 43% 18 OR
29091 Winona 13-Orange 1424 3-5 33% 13 MN
29092 AZPV 17-S 1424 28-31 47% 17 AZ
29093 Club GSL 13-Comp - mary 1424 12-9 46% 13 UT
29094 Iowa Select 18-Black 1424 15-21 38% 18 IA
29095 Solon Spartans 12-Orange 1424 8-8 42% 12 IA
29096 SoFLO 14-Gold 1424 32-23 58% 14 FL
29097 ECC 16-National bre 1424 20-30 40% 16 NJ
29098 KVA 16-Kaci 1424 3-5 38% 16 HI
29099 Quandomania Girls 15-2 1424 8-14 33% 15 NJ
29100 VC Denver 14-Regional 1424 14-15 48% 14 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.