Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 581 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
29001 NoDak Juniors 16-4 1425 2-3 40% 16 ND
29002 Tsunami 16-1n bijona 1424 14-16 47% 16 GA
29003 SADDLEBACK 16-Riley 1424 16-18 47% 16 CA
29004 TPV 14-White 1424 20-22 48% 14 TN
29005 Western Wisconsin Smash 16-S 1424 13-13 48% 16 WI
29006 VoltageVB 16-Blue-angelina 1424 19-19 50% 16 FL
29007 MauLoa VBC 12 MauLoa.Hilo Pikake 1424 4-4 50% 12 HI
29008 PVCGA 14-2 1424 8-8 50% 14 GA
29009 PAVC - NC 14-Pearl 1424 2-2 50% 14 NC
29010 Aus Velocity 12-2 emerald 1424 17-15 53% 12 TX
29011 Brookings 13-Black 1424 5-4 56% 13 SD
29012 Tsunami 14-2r 1424 22-16 58% 14 GA
29013 Southernmost 12-Black 1424 6-4 60% 12 FL
29014 Ignition 16 U16 1424 3-5 38% 16 WA
29015 North Scott 11-Gray 1424 0-3 0% 11 IA
29016 TopFlight 15-Alpha 1424 0-4 0% 15 NV
29017 NecTr Athletics 18-Jen 1424 0-0 0% 18 NV
29018 MAVS 816 16-1 1424 0-4 0% 16 KS
29019 XP 11-1 spring red 1424 0-2 0% 11 IL
29020 Thunder 13-S white 1424 1-3 17% 13 MN
29021 HVVC 12-Silver 1424 1-4 20% 12 MI
29022 Direction 12-Silver 1424 1-4 20% 12 NC
29023 Anamosa 15-S 1424 1-3 25% 15 IA
29024 OK Premier 14-2 andrea 1424 1-3 25% 14 OK
29025 Endless VBC 16-Navy willa 1424 2-6 25% 16 TX
29026 MAGIC 15-1 1424 1-3 25% 15 AL
29027 Radiate 18-Black 1424 5-12 26% 18 UT
29028 Seaway Smash 13 1424 6-14 29% 13 NY
29029 NWE 16-3 1424 2-5 29% 16 WA
29030 VCNL 14-Adidas 1424 3-7 30% 14 NE
29031 Independent 14-Vanoverberghe 1424 2-4 33% 14 IN
29032 Highlands Performance VB 17-1 1424 5-10 33% 17 MO
29033 WVBC 14-Sweet revenge 1424 12-22 35% 14 CA
29034 Twisters 15-Brandy 1424 5-9 36% 15 CA
29035 606 United VBC 12 UNITED SPARKS 1424 4-7 36% 12 KY
29036 Power 17-National 1424 7-12 37% 17 CA
29037 Eden Prairie 12-Black 1424 9-14 39% 12 MN
29038 LI Fury 16-Olivia 1424 7-11 39% 16 NY
29039 Palm Beach Jrs 15 Elite 1424 10-16 38% 15 FL
29040 Alamo 13 Silver 1424 17-27 37% 13 TX
29041 Coalition 16-1 1424 15-24 38% 16 CO
29042 Ducks Volleyball Club 14-2 les 1424 2-5 29% 14
29043 Gale Force Volleyball Club 14-Ug 1424 2-5 29% 14
29044 Lions 13-Spring 1424 4-6 40% 13 IL
29045 Chicago Elite 11-Kiwi 1424 6-9 40% 11 IL
29046 Landshark 16-Blue 1424 3-4 43% 16 KS
29047 Conquerors 14 1424 10-11 43% 14 FL
29048 Inspire 12u Purple 1424 6-8 43% 12 LA
29049 RVC 16-Hustle 1424 12-16 43% 16 CO
29050 ENVY 13-Green 1424 4-5 44% 13 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.