Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 580 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
28951 MemphisVBAcademy 14-Black 1425 19-22 45% 14 MS
28952 LaVille 10-White 1425 1-3 25% 10 IN
28953 Chewblocka 13 1425 1-4 20% 13 NV
28954 AAVC 13-1 1425 1-3 25% 13 NV
28955 NVC Peak 18 1425 5-7 42% 18 WA
28956 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 15 MOCO (MD) Momentum 1425 2-3 40% 15 MD
28957 Anamosa 14-S 1425 1-3 25% 14 IA
28958 HPRIME 11-Black 1425 0-2 0% 11 TX
28959 Club UV 16 UV Lydia 1425 3-7 23% 16 UT
28960 Red Rock 15-Devin hybrid - redwood city 1425 9-27 25% 15 CA
28961 BBVC 12 1425 9-6 60% 12 KY
28962 Club One AZ 14-Red 1425 17-11 61% 14 AZ
28963 Cache Valley Volleyball Club 16-1 1425 2-4 29% 16 UT
28964 PVC 16-Downs 1425 6-9 32% 16 NV
28965 Powerwest Volleyball Club 15-White 1425 2-5 29% 15
28966 Rose City VBC 16-1 1425 9-17 35% 16 OR
28967 RJS Sports 13-1 1425 8-12 40% 13 NJ
28968 KIVA 16-Grey 1425 21-34 38% 16 KY
28969 TCV 14 14-C 1425 2-4 33% 14 TX
28970 3s Up VBA 13-1 1425 15-26 37% 13 SC
28971 High Line 16-Renegades 1425 11-21 34% 16 PA
28972 Select 16-Local 1425 2-5 25% 16 ND
28973 DUNES 16-Silver mike 1425 1-3 25% 16 IN
28974 TAV 14-White (NTR) 1425 17-20 41% 14
28975 TxINV 14 1425 6-9 33% 14
28976 OVVC 14-Aqua 1425 6-11 35% 14 OH
28977 GPVBC 15-1 1425 4-6 40% 15 OK
28978 GCVA 12-1 coast 1425 11-15 42% 12 TX
28979 LTX SELECT 14-Black 1425 8-11 42% 14 TX
28980 Club SyrV 15-New york 1425 18-22 42% 15 NY
28981 Madison Elite 14-Black 1425 29-38 43% 14 WI
28982 OCVBC 16-1 1425 3-4 43% 16 MO
28983 Ballyhoo 16-Black 1425 26-35 43% 16 PA
28984 MVP 60450 14-White 1425 12-15 43% 14 IL
28985 Kairos 13-Green 1425 11-13 44% 13 SD
28986 BYVA 14-1 1425 5-8 38% 14 MN
28987 El Paso Fury 13 EP Fury Gems (SU) 1425 5-12 25% 13 TX
28988 Flashes 11-1 1425 8-12 40% 11 CA
28989 FPVC 16-Lydia 1425 2-3 40% 16 CA
28990 Sunshine 10-Hotshots 1425 7-9 44% 10 CA
28991 575 13-Wsr andres 1425 24-29 45% 13 GA
28992 Seal Beach 11-Black 1425 15-18 45% 11 CA
28993 Mighty Mo 14-Saiers 1425 12-9 46% 14 MT
28994 A5 Gwinnett 14-Sarai 1425 13-14 48% 14 GA
28995 GRV 16-White-shyanne 1425 13-14 48% 16 IN
28996 Playeros 15-1 mari 1425 20-20 50% 15 FL
28997 575 14-Wsr laura 1425 19-18 51% 14 GA
28998 Legacy 13-Select east 1425 22-15 59% 13 MI
28999 Southside Swarm VBC 18-1 1425 3-2 60% 18 MO
29000 Indians 14 1425 3-2 60% 14 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.