Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 579 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
28901 OK Charge 14-1 stillwater 1425 8-10 42% 14 OK
28902 SVBC Spirit 14-Teal 1425 1-4 20% 14 IA
28903 Club Z 18-Peanut 1425 21-16 57% 18 NM
28904 Altitude 14 Elevate 1425 14-10 56% 14 AZ
28905 UP North Jr's DSN 14-Navy 1425 6-8 43% 14 WI
28906 BCS Skyline H 14 Molten 1425 7-9 44% 14 TX
28907 Maverick 14-White 1425 7-9 44% 14 OH
28908 Konza Volleyball Club 15-2 1425 3-5 38% 15 KS
28909 Prime 12-1 taylor 1425 2-5 29% 12 CA
28910 MVC Elite 14-1 1425 8-6 57% 14 AR
28911 Drive Nation 18-Black 1425 3-19 14% 18 TX
28912 Juggernaut 17-National 2 1425 33-36 48% 17 CO
28913 360 16-National red 1425 8-8 42% 16 NV
28914 BCS Skyline H 12-Black 1425 7-14 33% 12 TX
28915 Princeton Volleyball Club 14 1425 17-18 49% 14 NJ
28916 Amarillo Xtreme 11 Blast 1425 12-20 38% 11 TX
28917 NIVA South 12-Giraffes 1425 1-3 25% 12 IN
28918 ASHOK 12-1 1425 14-24 36% 12 GA
28919 IA Juniors 15-Black 1425 20-38 34% 15 IA
28920 Panthers 18 1425 2-2 50% 18 FL
28921 352Elite 18-G green 1425 25-30 45% 18 FL
28922 Impact VB 14-Surge 1425 9-16 35% 14 SD
28923 CPAC 14-White 1425 1-3 20% 14 SD
28924 Guns Up VBC 16 Elite 1425 22-35 39% 16 TX
28925 SPVC 13-Adidas 1425 21-33 39% 13 CA
28926 HOT 15-Elite 1425 9-13 41% 15 NY
28927 HP South 17-Premier 1425 24-41 36% 17 MO
28928 GVC 14-Golden 1425 8-6 57% 14 FL
28929 LI Fury 18-Mangan 1425 9-9 50% 18 NY
28930 Storm 11-Black 1425 6-19 22% 11 CO
28931 CJV 13-Select navy 1425 13-22 37% 13 NC
28932 EKJV 17-Regional 1425 10-9 53% 17 KY
28933 RVA G16-Pink 1425 36-37 49% 16 WI
28934 Velocity Volleyball Club 15 U16 Royal (CA) (33) 1425 6-5 55% 15 AZ
28935 CLUB 43 14-2 1425 16-17 48% 14 MN
28936 PAO Southside 13-Rda cmg 1425 17-27 38% 13 MO
28937 CSF 18-Legacy 1425 13-20 39% 18 NC
28938 New Age 15-Showcase 1425 17-24 41% 15 TX
28939 Ka Ulukoa 12-Hula 1425 4-4 50% 12 HI
28940 HVCC 17-1 1425 1-3 25% 17 SD
28941 Burlington Elite 11-Black 1425 8-10 44% 11 WI
28942 Rev 12-White (GL) 1425 6-5 55% 12 IL
28943 CinciVB Acad 18-2 1425 12-24 33% 18 OH
28944 Matrix 15-S girls 1425 2-5 29% 15 AZ
28945 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 17 SWVC RS18-POMRENKE 1425 1-10 9% 17 WY
28946 T4 Volleyball Club (IL) 12 T4 Volleyball (IL) 12G Navy (GL) 1425 8-8 50% 12 IL
28947 El Paso Fury 13 EPFury Onyx (SU) 1425 9-14 35% 13 TX
28948 A5 11-2 1425 2-6 25% 11 GA
28949 Sting 10 Honeybees 1425 15-22 41% 10 WI
28950 OVBC 10-Black 1425 8-11 38% 10 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.