Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 578 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
28851 SLAM 13-Black 1426 11-16 37% 13 TX
28852 Queen 15 1426 1-2 33% 15 WI
28853 Orion Chargers 11-Black 1426 2-5 22% 11 IA
28854 S-MAQ 14-1 silver 1426 8-12 40% 14 OH
28855 ArkJrs 17-S mh 1426 7-11 39% 17 AR
28856 PVA 12-Spark 1426 13-21 37% 12 IL
28857 Downstate 17-Vipers 1426 17-18 49% 17 NY
28858 Rooted VBC 14-1 1426 2-6 25% 14 NV
28859 #951 Elite 17-1 1426 22-29 43% 17 CA
28860 Boiler Jrs 16-R white 1426 21-24 47% 16 IN
28861 CVC 16 Giselle 1426 7-8 37% 16
28862 Vienna Elite 17-Black 1426 28-31 47% 17 VA
28863 VOLT 15-Black 1426 16-29 33% 15 ND
28864 BVC 10-Cubs 1426 2-3 40% 10 IA
28865 Ct Juniors 15-Premier 1426 14-20 41% 15 CT
28866 Kids America 12-R jackson 1426 0-4 0% 12 OH
28867 NET 13-Lightning 1426 11-19 30% 13 NY
28868 Train Up VB 18-1 1426 16-25 39% 18 NJ
28869 Thunderstrike 18-Spring 1426 1-4 20% 18 MI
28870 573 Missouri Juniors G17-2 1426 1-3 25% 17 MO
28871 SAFB 11-Firestorm 1426 6-8 40% 11 TX
28872 REFINE 13 Refine Glenn (SO) 1426 1-2 25% 13 AL
28873 Next Rev VB 14-Silver 1426 18-22 45% 14 VA
28874 LJVBC 12-1 1426 12-7 60% 12 KS
28875 REFINE 12 Refine Hollander (SO) 1426 3-4 33% 12 AL
28876 FTL 14-Nuclear j 1426 10-17 37% 14 FL
28877 RADD Elite 15-1 1426 14-31 31% 15 FL
28878 AVC 17 1426 2-3 40% 17 FL
28879 Premier 15-Red c 1426 12-15 43% 15 TX
28880 Dominate 17-1 1426 20-17 51% 17 TX
28881 KeAloha 15-1 regional 1426 16-15 52% 15 IN
28882 NVPUR 11-Negron luis 1426 5-10 33% 11 PR
28883 Crossfire 17-3 1426 28-32 47% 17 MN
28884 SA Abyss 12-1 black 1426 7-8 47% 12 TX
28885 Waupaca Fire VBC 18 Waupaca Fire 17/18's 1426 6-7 46% 18 WI
28886 Velocity 219 14-Elias 1426 2-3 40% 14 IN
28887 City Beach 15-Mark 1426 2-3 40% 15 CA
28888 Club One AZ 17-Royal 1425 2-5 29% 17 AZ
28889 Rockwall Heat 14-Ignite 1425 4-4 50% 14 TX
28890 VOLT VBC 16 VOLT-Surge (WE) 1425 17-15 52% 16
28891 C2 17-2 reg blue keisha 1425 12-18 40% 17 TN
28892 Kulia 14-S black 1425 8-13 38% 14 HI
28893 CUVC 11-Howl 1425 6-14 27% 11 NC
28894 Max Performance 14-Red 1425 16-20 44% 14 TX
28895 NorCal Volleyball Club 12 NorCal Juniors Kim 6 1425 6-13 32% 12 CA
28896 SouthJamm 13-Black 1425 12-8 50% 13 AL
28897 MOD Regional G14-White 1425 14-12 54% 14 IL
28898 East Bay Volleyball Academy 14-Crimson 1425 8-18 31% 14 FL
28899 Ignite 14-Premier (SC) 1425 20-22 48% 14 CA
28900 Club OAHO 14-White 1425 14-20 41% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.