Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 577 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
28801 ESA 16-Black 1426 5-4 56% 16 NV
28802 EVC 16 National 1426 24-21 53% 16 IL
28803 Team 27 14-Lynzie 1426 8-7 53% 14 MI
28804 SVC 14-White 1426 9-9 50% 14 FL
28805 KewExp 17-1 1426 3-3 50% 17 IA
28806 Ohana Owls 12 12U Ohana Owls 1426 14-18 44% 12
28807 Tx Outlaws 11-Blue 1426 0-2 0% 11 TX
28808 Buster 14-30 1426 0-5 0% 14 VA
28809 R-Sports Volleyball 16-1 1426 0-3 0% 16 NY
28810 Odyssey 16-Navy 1426 0-2 0% 16 IL
28811 UNITED 16 1426 0-5 0% 16 IL
28812 Club 801 12-Club emilee 1426 5-9 25% 12 UT
28813 NVA 12-Navy 1426 1-3 25% 12 NE
28814 Fireballs 12 1426 1-3 25% 12 MO
28815 Gardiner 16-3 1426 2-4 25% 16 MT
28816 BAVC 13-Comets 1426 1-2 25% 13 IL
28817 Premier 16 Crimson 1426 11-27 28% 16 TX
28818 Girls 16-Elite 1426 14-33 30% 16 NV
28819 WC 15-Pink 1426 5-7 31% 15 GA
28820 CYDI 12-Blue 1426 8-12 36% 12 TX
28821 EAA 12 1426 8-7 53% 12 KY
28822 Ocean 15-Tyler 1426 14-20 41% 15 NJ
28823 Panhandle Powerhouse 16 Blair 1426 2-2 50% 16 WY
28824 ZTV 12-3 gold 1426 7-8 37% 12 MT
28825 HardRock 16 1426 19-30 39% 16 NH
28826 LOTOVC 17 1426 2-3 40% 17 MO
28827 All In 13-Purple 1426 2-3 40% 13 IL
28828 WRJ 13-1 1426 2-3 40% 13 AR
28829 SEV 14-2 1426 5-5 50% 14 MN
28830 Munciana 12-L zebras white 1426 2-3 40% 12 IN
28831 TUVA 14-Elite 1426 8-29 22% 14 NC
28832 MN Attack 14-Silver 1426 3-7 30% 14 MN
28833 SA Elite 12-Medina valley 1426 4-7 36% 12 TX
28834 EVRC 16-Sidney 1426 15-19 44% 16 IN
28835 Parker VC 16-S 1426 6-13 32% 16 AZ
28836 KC Force 14-Black 1426 7-12 37% 14 MO
28837 Momentous VBC 14-Jordan 1426 7-14 33% 14 CA
28838 NC Intensity 12-Madi 1426 9-9 50% 12 NC
28839 AVCA 11 1426 3-4 43% 11
28840 GSVC 16-Navy 1426 31-22 58% 16 NH
28841 GLVBC 13-Green cecilia 1426 9-11 41% 13 MI
28842 Rise 13-2 1426 6-8 43% 13 WV
28843 NORCO 14-Silver 1426 12-10 55% 14 CO
28844 Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 13-2 1426 8-13 33% 13 MN
28845 Medford 12-Black 1426 1-3 25% 12 MN
28846 Pursuit Volleyball Club 18 Pursuit -Hope 1426 6-9 40% 18 CA
28847 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 11-Navy 1426 11-16 41% 11 CO
28848 Anthracite Attack 17U SILVER 1426 1-3 17% 17 PA
28849 Topeka Saints 11 Slater 1426 2-4 33% 11 KS
28850 Tempo Volleyball 15-Girls 1426 3-6 33% 15 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.