Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 550 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
27451 Optimus Volleyball 16-2 1439 20-25 44% 16 PA
27452 CYVBC Surge 14-Blue 1439 12-16 43% 14 OH
27453 IMPACT Elite 15-Black 1439 3-4 43% 15
27454 MILTON EDGE 16 Milton Edge Blackout (CA) 1439 1-4 20% 16
27455 OTown U12-Black 1439 1-3 25% 12 WA
27456 WTNVB 16-1 1439 1-3 25% 16 TN
27457 MVP FL 14-Black 1439 0-2 0% 14 FL
27458 Impact White 12-S 1439 0-2 0% 12 HI
27459 MCJO 10-S black 1439 0-4 0% 10 MN
27460 KC Thunder 14-Black 1439 3-4 43% 14 WA
27461 Aftershock 15-Ena-lexus 1439 3-4 43% 15 CA
27462 Blues 18-1 gold 1439 12-11 52% 18 OR
27463 Colorado Xtreme VBC 14-Black 1439 13-12 52% 14 CO
27464 Midwest Jrs. 12-2 1439 8-4 53% 12 KS
27465 Adversity-WI 18-1 1439 29-26 53% 18 WI
27466 Action 17 1439 2-5 29% 17 BC
27467 K1 15-Ruben 1439 2-4 33% 15 PR
27468 AVC CLE 10-White 1439 3-7 30% 10 OH
27469 KIVA 10 Ella 1439 2-4 33% 10 KY
27470 Shockwave VB Academy 13-2 1439 2-4 33% 13 KS
27471 Momentous VBC 13-Erin 1438 18-20 47% 13 CA
27472 Stars 14-Silver 1438 9-8 50% 14 ND
27473 Lions South 15-S 1438 25-26 49% 15 IL
27474 3CVBC 11 Kim 1438 19-20 48% 11 TX
27475 SA Spartans 13 Omega 1438 13-14 48% 13 TX
27476 Galaxy 17 James 1438 14-16 47% 17 NC
27477 SEVA 15 Crimson 1438 22-25 47% 15 TN
27478 Next Level 18-Sage 1438 7-10 41% 18 MI
27479 Queen City VBC 17 Queen City Black 1438 4-6 40% 17 PA
27480 CinciVB Acad 12-5 1438 1-3 25% 12 OH
27481 Sask Stealth Stealth 15-S 1438 3-5 38% 15
27482 PVC LEAD 14 1438 7-7 47% 14
27483 Charged Up 13-White 1438 6-5 55% 13 MI
27484 All Set 14-Ice 1438 4-4 50% 14 AK
27485 Elite 14-Select 1438 2-3 40% 14 MO
27486 adidas DYNASTY 11-4 1438 2-2 40% 11 KS
27487 Jaguars 14u Black 1438 21-24 44% 14 NY
27488 SVA Girls 16-Red 1438 2-4 33% 16 MN
27489 Northfield 16-Gold 1438 20-24 45% 16 MN
27490 KOKUA 12-1 1438 9-17 35% 12 WA
27491 MVA 15 Travel 1438 18-27 40% 15 MD
27492 WI Flight 14 Antigo 1438 2-3 40% 14 WI
27493 NWI Premier NWI 13-Blue 1438 2-3 40% 13 IA
27494 Prairie VBC 13 1438 5-6 38% 13 IA
27495 Maverick 14 Maroon 1438 18-28 39% 14 OH
27496 Kidron VBC Davis-Walsh-Knouff 14 1438 6-7 46% 14 OH
27497 PCVBC 14-Charge 1438 13-12 52% 14 OH
27498 LBK 15-2 1438 7-7 50% 15 OH
27499 Code Blue 15-Shock 1438 13-15 46% 15 OK
27500 SCVB 12-Zak 1438 19-24 44% 12 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.