2025-2026 Season — Page 551 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27501 | Prime 12-Molten | 1438 | 15-20 | 43% | 12 | CA |
| 27502 | NorCal Volleyball Club 12 NorCal Juniors Jaymes 6 | 1438 | 8-12 | 40% | 12 | CA |
| 27503 | London Elite 13-Black | 1438 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | OH |
| 27504 | Aces 16-White | 1438 | 3-5 | 33% | 16 | ND |
| 27505 | Flyers 14-Hfl-rich | 1438 | 2-2 | 40% | 14 | TX |
| 27506 | NVA 10-Navy | 1438 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | NE |
| 27507 | West County 15 | 1438 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | CA |
| 27508 | Lady Warriors 14 | 1438 | 0-4 | 0% | 14 | NM |
| 27509 | CMASS EDGE 13-White | 1438 | 16-21 | 43% | 13 | MA |
| 27510 | Herederas Volley Stars 15 Herederas Richmillie | 1438 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | PR |
| 27511 | C4 16-Red | 1438 | 11-13 | 46% | 16 | SC |
| 27512 | Momentous VBC 14-Troy | 1438 | 0-3 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 27513 | Legends 15-2 javi | 1438 | 6-6 | 50% | 15 | PR |
| 27514 | NIVA 11-Green | 1438 | 12-14 | 46% | 11 | IN |
| 27515 | Schuylkill Eclipse 16-Solar | 1438 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | PA |
| 27516 | C2 Sports 14-City | 1438 | 8-14 | 36% | 14 | TN |
| 27517 | Delaware Juniors 11-Navy | 1438 | 5-5 | 38% | 11 | PA |
| 27518 | IVC 12-Black | 1438 | 2-5 | 20% | 12 | IA |
| 27519 | ATHENA VB 11-1 gold | 1438 | 12-24 | 33% | 11 | OR |
| 27520 | Tstreet SN 15-Sydney | 1438 | 19-23 | 45% | 15 | NV |
| 27521 | Spokane Ignite 12 U12 Ignite (EV) | 1438 | 6-7 | 46% | 12 | |
| 27522 | Cities 17-Jordan | 1438 | 23-21 | 52% | 17 | VA |
| 27523 | 716 United VBC 16U | 1438 | 7-11 | 30% | 16 | NY |
| 27524 | JAGS 13-1 | 1438 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | MN |
| 27525 | Elevate Volleyball 17 Elevate Red | 1438 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | PA |
| 27526 | WSRVC 14-Scheider | 1438 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | WY |
| 27527 | SMASH Volleyball 14-Blue | 1438 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | MA |
| 27528 | Hot Shots 15-1 | 1438 | 7-9 | 44% | 15 | OH |
| 27529 | OTown 14-Black | 1438 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | WA |
| 27530 | Impact VB 13-Elite | 1438 | 15-22 | 41% | 13 | SD |
| 27531 | NJVBC 12-S aces | 1438 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | PA |
| 27532 | MPV 13-National black | 1438 | 16-27 | 33% | 13 | UT |
| 27533 | CVA 17-1 graff | 1438 | 5-8 | 38% | 17 | IA |
| 27534 | ACESZ 16-White | 1438 | 9-7 | 56% | 16 | MI |
| 27535 | HVCC 12-1 | 1438 | 1-2 | 25% | 12 | SD |
| 27536 | Prism 14 Sapphire | 1438 | 18-38 | 32% | 14 | WA |
| 27537 | AsheVC 14-Phil | 1438 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | NC |
| 27538 | Momentum 16-2 | 1438 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | IN |
| 27539 | Conquerors 15 | 1438 | 9-12 | 38% | 15 | FL |
| 27540 | CSRA Heat 12-White | 1438 | 8-12 | 36% | 12 | GA |
| 27541 | REPUBLIC VC 11-1 | 1438 | 9-8 | 53% | 11 | TX |
| 27542 | Montverde Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1438 | 23-31 | 43% | 16 | FL |
| 27543 | NVA 14-Teal | 1438 | 1-2 | 25% | 14 | NE |
| 27544 | GSJ 14-Purple conway | 1438 | 21-18 | 54% | 14 | SC |
| 27545 | Air VBC 15-Black | 1438 | 6-11 | 35% | 15 | WI |
| 27546 | PVC 11 | 1438 | 1-2 | 20% | 11 | IA |
| 27547 | Metro VBC 11-Pink | 1438 | 9-12 | 43% | 11 | IN |
| 27548 | Effingham Elite 14-R | 1438 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | NY |
| 27549 | C-Force VBC 16-Black | 1438 | 27-25 | 52% | 16 | TN |
| 27550 | PVC 15-Blue | 1438 | 9-9 | 45% | 15 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.