Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 549 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
27401 Madelia Blast 16-1 1439 2-3 40% 16 MN
27402 RSVBC 15-1 1439 18-39 32% 15 WA
27403 OTH 13-2 1439 1-3 25% 13 FL
27404 Nebraska ONE 14-Inferno 1439 0-2 0% 14 NE
27405 ECC 14-South red 1439 9-18 33% 14 NJ
27406 Summit Volleyball Club 17-1 1439 1-2 20% 17 MO
27407 Hawks 17-Aviles 1439 22-27 45% 17 CT
27408 AZ SKY 14-N4 1439 21-18 54% 14 AZ
27409 Pine Club Volleyball 18 18U Pine Club 1439 2-3 40% 18 MN
27410 Chi City 12-3 regional 1439 8-11 42% 12 IL
27411 TEAM Kiwi 16-Lime 1439 21-11 66% 16 FL
27412 EAA 14-Black 1439 13-11 54% 14 KY
27413 SoCal Legends Volleyball Club 17-Gold 1439 11-15 42% 17 CA
27414 Cap City 16-Select purple 1439 9-17 29% 16 MT
27415 Dunes 11-Orange 1439 8-9 47% 11 IN
27416 G3 13-Elite ryan 1439 18-18 49% 13 MO
27417 Casper Aces 13 1439 2-3 40% 13 WY
27418 Lomanview 12-U aleysa 1439 1-2 33% 12 PR
27419 ECJVC 17-Premier 1439 15-21 42% 17 NC
27420 Spiketown Door County 13 1439 8-11 42% 13 WI
27421 NEVA 16-White jetta 1439 15-15 43% 16 UT
27422 REPUBLIC VC 15-Red 1439 26-17 60% 15 TX
27423 SA Magic 15 PREMIER 1439 22-30 42% 15 TX
27424 River City Jrs 13-Silver 1439 12-14 43% 13 IA
27425 Rogue 14-Elite 1439 15-27 36% 14 OH
27426 Spiketown Volleyball Club 14-3 1439 5-5 50% 14 OH
27427 Lakeland 12 1439 2-3 40% 12 IN
27428 ONEva 17-Black 1439 4-4 50% 17 NE
27429 YVA 18-Nicole 1439 7-8 47% 18 MT
27430 SPVB 13-C-fed 1439 27-34 44% 13 IL
27431 GW.Wentzville Heat 15-1 navy 1439 6-2 60% 15 MO
27432 ATHENAVB Bend 14-1 gold 1439 20-38 34% 14 OR
27433 SOUTHEAST VOLLEYBALL 15-1 1439 9-13 41% 15 OH
27434 MVA 16-2 1439 2-5 29% 16 GA
27435 CC Storm 13-Elite erika 1439 14-14 50% 13 TX
27436 C2 17-2 regional blue keisha 1439 7-7 50% 17 TN
27437 BGCNRI Riptide 14-Blue 1439 11-16 38% 14 RI
27438 Eclipse 16 Solar 1439 25-23 52% 16 WI
27439 OYA 15-Aloha 1439 14-19 42% 15 CA
27440 BRUSA 15-3 carlos 1439 4-6 40% 15 CA
27441 IMUA UVC 15-Aqua 1439 13-13 50% 15 CA
27442 TX Infinity 14-S red 1439 9-16 36% 14 TX
27443 Heroes 14-Raider 1439 9-12 39% 14 TX
27444 Storm 14-Regional purple 1439 6-6 50% 14 TX
27445 CPA 12 Coupland 1439 6-6 50% 12 WA
27446 EVA 13-Green victoria 1439 12-14 46% 13 KY
27447 OPVBC 16 Bainbridge 1439 20-14 59% 16 WA
27448 Clark Fork Juniors 16-1 1439 9-6 60% 16 WA
27449 AVC 15-Gray 1439 3-3 50% 15 PA
27450 Blast Volleyball Club 15 15U Blast Black 1439 5-7 36% 15 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.