Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 542 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
27051 Sky High 18-Bob 1442 14-15 45% 18 IL
27052 501 Volley 11-Pink 1442 10-11 48% 11 AR
27053 BCO 17-Black 1442 1-7 13% 17 WA
27054 SYA Club 16 SYA Titans 1442 15-17 47% 16
27055 Gators 15-Green 1442 18-21 46% 15 MA
27056 Munciana 15 Lycan 1442 25-40 38% 15 IN
27057 BAVC 16-Regional dawnell 1442 17-24 41% 16 CA
27058 Phoenix G13-Red 1442 10-23 30% 13 OH
27059 Kali 15-F zuly 1442 3-5 38% 15 PR
27060 Crush 16-1 murray 1442 13-12 52% 16 GA
27061 MHVBC 16-1 1442 4-3 57% 16 CA
27062 Napa Storm 13-Black 1442 13-16 45% 13 CA
27063 IMPACT 15-1 alaska 1442 14-19 41% 15 AK
27064 Premier Nebraska 13-Black 1442 3-29 9% 13 NE
27065 KNVBC 15-Topeka power 1442 7-7 50% 15 KS
27066 NK 16-Blizzard 1442 5-6 38% 16 ND
27067 H2 14 1442 5-6 45% 14 NC
27068 LCVC 13-White 1442 8-10 44% 13 IN
27069 BAMVC 17-Pink 1442 17-22 44% 17 KY
27070 Independent 13-Woodill 1442 1-3 25% 13 IN
27071 Club One 13-3 grey 1442 1-3 25% 13 OH
27072 EVC 14-Green 1442 9-5 64% 14 IL
27073 Mhvc 13-1 1442 10-10 50% 13 CA
27074 3D BLACK 14 1442 1-3 25% 14 IA
27075 TNT 14-Queen 1442 5-7 29% 14 PA
27076 Altitude 16-White 1442 21-17 53% 16 AZ
27077 FVA 17-2 1442 21-29 42% 17 MO
27078 Madtown 13-1 select 1442 21-24 47% 13 WI
27079 SMASH Raiders 18-3 1442 5-5 50% 18 OH
27080 SC VB Project 14-Red 1442 1-4 20% 14 CA
27081 No Limits 12-Regional 1442 8-10 36% 12 NV
27082 ClubOne 15 Gold 1442 22-21 51% 15 CO
27083 Lewistown 18-1 1442 6-9 35% 18 MT
27084 Unified 13-Blue 1442 19-17 53% 13 MI
27085 IV Force 14-Regional 1442 8-13 38% 14 CA
27086 RVC 12 Ken 1442 20-23 47% 12 VA
27087 Tribe 12-Premier cardinal 1442 20-16 56% 12 FL
27088 ABBA Volleyball Club 15 16-Eclebery (OV) 1442 2-7 22% 15 OH
27089 Synergy 15 Ascend 1442 20-25 43% 15 PA
27090 MAVA 16-Blue 1442 32-37 46% 16 KY
27091 Devils Tower 14 1442 1-3 25% 14 WY
27092 BVB 16 1442 3-2 60% 16 MN
27093 Guns Up VBC 12-Red 1442 18-14 56% 12 TX
27094 Upper Valleyball Club 14-2 forza 1442 1-3 25% 14 WA
27095 Pakmen VC Black 18 1442 5-8 38% 18 ON
27096 WVBA 16-Molten 1442 32-31 51% 16 WA
27097 Elmwood Chargers 10 1442 16-22 42% 10 IL
27098 NE Top Flight 17-Gold 1442 1-3 25% 17 NE
27099 Unified 12-Sky 1442 4-5 44% 12 MI
27100 MEVC 13 American 1442 23-28 42% 13 MD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.