Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 541 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
27001 Bandits Volleyball Club 15-Jolene 1443 3-4 43% 15 AL
27002 Integrity 18-Intense red 1443 10-24 26% 18 PA
27003 Crossfire 17-2 1443 30-45 40% 17 MN
27004 UVC 12-Sam/damon 1443 22-31 42% 12 CA
27005 SKC 16-1 1443 2-5 29% 16 KS
27006 KC Force 16-1 1443 6-6 50% 16 MO
27007 West VBC 14 1443 13-13 50% 14 CO
27008 WENTZVILLE HEAT 16-1 navy 1443 16-18 38% 16 MO
27009 Sunshine 12-Premier 1443 15-13 54% 12 CA
27010 LIV 14-Adidas 1443 23-26 46% 14 LA
27011 Core 15-Ervin 1443 9-7 50% 15 NJ
27012 Princeton 18-1 1443 4-4 50% 18 MN
27013 Next Level 14-Naupaka 1443 14-21 40% 14 NV
27014 Upontop 11-S claudia 1443 1-3 25% 11 FL
27015 ELITE PRIMETIME 12-1 1443 3-6 25% 12 TX
27016 Baker Volleyball Club 14 1443 3-2 60% 14
27017 SOINE 10-2 1443 4-7 36% 10 KY
27018 EC Power Chesapeake 14-Black 1442 3-12 20% 14 PA
27019 NW Force G15-1 1442 2-3 40% 15 MO
27020 O4G FORCE 13 1442 2-3 40% 13
27021 clubSAV 15-Nat'l chandler 1442 1-4 20% 15 GA
27022 Oakville Thunder Volleyball Club 16 Surge 1442 2-3 40% 16 ON
27023 FPVC 14-Ethan 1442 2-3 40% 14 CA
27024 Avalanche Volleyball Club 16 Avalanche Marlene 1442 2-3 40% 16 MI
27025 GTVC 16-24 1442 2-3 40% 16 MT
27026 STVA 15-White-1 1442 27-28 49% 15 TX
27027 Defensa 13 13Rob 1442 5-5 50% 13 ON
27028 Tribe VBA 12 Tribe VBA (HO) 1442 15-15 50% 12 IN
27029 OCV 14-1 1442 10-10 50% 14 ID
27030 TXP 16-Luis 1442 3-3 50% 16 TX
27031 MN Attack 16-Purple 1442 10-10 50% 16 MN
27032 Vancouver Thunder Volleyball Club 15-Blue 1442 3-4 43% 15
27033 Blocskport 13-R 1442 3-3 38% 13
27034 MATRIX 12-Logan 1442 1-4 20% 12 CA
27035 949 12-Black 1442 21-29 42% 12 CA
27036 LuMaDe 14-White 1442 11-5 69% 14 FL
27037 Momentum Volleyball 10-Shelby 1442 6-9 40% 10 CO
27038 Starlings 16-S 1442 1-3 20% 16 NE
27039 CVA 14-Maroon 1442 12-11 52% 14 LA
27040 TEAM Kiwi 17-Columbia 1442 37-31 54% 17 FL
27041 Morgantown Volleyball Club 13-1 1442 17-28 35% 13 OH
27042 Eagles 16-1 1442 0-2 0% 16 MN
27043 RAJO 18-S 1442 5-7 42% 18 MN
27044 Pure Aloha 15-1 1442 2-5 29% 15 HI
27045 VVBC 15 1442 3-5 38% 15 HI
27046 EEVC 17-1 1442 7-5 50% 17 NY
27047 Shenandoah Surge Volleyball Club 15 15U Shenandoah Surge MD 1442 15-17 43% 15 MD
27048 Buckeye 15-Red 1442 3-6 33% 15 OH
27049 SA Destination 14-1 1442 13-11 50% 14 TX
27050 Angelo Rise 14-2 1442 23-27 46% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.