2025-2026 Season — Page 541 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27001 | Bandits Volleyball Club 15-Jolene | 1443 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | AL |
| 27002 | Integrity 18-Intense red | 1443 | 10-24 | 26% | 18 | PA |
| 27003 | Crossfire 17-2 | 1443 | 30-45 | 40% | 17 | MN |
| 27004 | UVC 12-Sam/damon | 1443 | 22-31 | 42% | 12 | CA |
| 27005 | SKC 16-1 | 1443 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | KS |
| 27006 | KC Force 16-1 | 1443 | 6-6 | 50% | 16 | MO |
| 27007 | West VBC 14 | 1443 | 13-13 | 50% | 14 | CO |
| 27008 | WENTZVILLE HEAT 16-1 navy | 1443 | 16-18 | 38% | 16 | MO |
| 27009 | Sunshine 12-Premier | 1443 | 15-13 | 54% | 12 | CA |
| 27010 | LIV 14-Adidas | 1443 | 23-26 | 46% | 14 | LA |
| 27011 | Core 15-Ervin | 1443 | 9-7 | 50% | 15 | NJ |
| 27012 | Princeton 18-1 | 1443 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | MN |
| 27013 | Next Level 14-Naupaka | 1443 | 14-21 | 40% | 14 | NV |
| 27014 | Upontop 11-S claudia | 1443 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | FL |
| 27015 | ELITE PRIMETIME 12-1 | 1443 | 3-6 | 25% | 12 | TX |
| 27016 | Baker Volleyball Club 14 | 1443 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | |
| 27017 | SOINE 10-2 | 1443 | 4-7 | 36% | 10 | KY |
| 27018 | EC Power Chesapeake 14-Black | 1442 | 3-12 | 20% | 14 | PA |
| 27019 | NW Force G15-1 | 1442 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | MO |
| 27020 | O4G FORCE 13 | 1442 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | |
| 27021 | clubSAV 15-Nat'l chandler | 1442 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | GA |
| 27022 | Oakville Thunder Volleyball Club 16 Surge | 1442 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | ON |
| 27023 | FPVC 14-Ethan | 1442 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 27024 | Avalanche Volleyball Club 16 Avalanche Marlene | 1442 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | MI |
| 27025 | GTVC 16-24 | 1442 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | MT |
| 27026 | STVA 15-White-1 | 1442 | 27-28 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 27027 | Defensa 13 13Rob | 1442 | 5-5 | 50% | 13 | ON |
| 27028 | Tribe VBA 12 Tribe VBA (HO) | 1442 | 15-15 | 50% | 12 | IN |
| 27029 | OCV 14-1 | 1442 | 10-10 | 50% | 14 | ID |
| 27030 | TXP 16-Luis | 1442 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 27031 | MN Attack 16-Purple | 1442 | 10-10 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 27032 | Vancouver Thunder Volleyball Club 15-Blue | 1442 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | |
| 27033 | Blocskport 13-R | 1442 | 3-3 | 38% | 13 | |
| 27034 | MATRIX 12-Logan | 1442 | 1-4 | 20% | 12 | CA |
| 27035 | 949 12-Black | 1442 | 21-29 | 42% | 12 | CA |
| 27036 | LuMaDe 14-White | 1442 | 11-5 | 69% | 14 | FL |
| 27037 | Momentum Volleyball 10-Shelby | 1442 | 6-9 | 40% | 10 | CO |
| 27038 | Starlings 16-S | 1442 | 1-3 | 20% | 16 | NE |
| 27039 | CVA 14-Maroon | 1442 | 12-11 | 52% | 14 | LA |
| 27040 | TEAM Kiwi 17-Columbia | 1442 | 37-31 | 54% | 17 | FL |
| 27041 | Morgantown Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1442 | 17-28 | 35% | 13 | OH |
| 27042 | Eagles 16-1 | 1442 | 0-2 | 0% | 16 | MN |
| 27043 | RAJO 18-S | 1442 | 5-7 | 42% | 18 | MN |
| 27044 | Pure Aloha 15-1 | 1442 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | HI |
| 27045 | VVBC 15 | 1442 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | HI |
| 27046 | EEVC 17-1 | 1442 | 7-5 | 50% | 17 | NY |
| 27047 | Shenandoah Surge Volleyball Club 15 15U Shenandoah Surge MD | 1442 | 15-17 | 43% | 15 | MD |
| 27048 | Buckeye 15-Red | 1442 | 3-6 | 33% | 15 | OH |
| 27049 | SA Destination 14-1 | 1442 | 13-11 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 27050 | Angelo Rise 14-2 | 1442 | 23-27 | 46% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.