Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 540 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26951 JCVC 14-K 1443 12-12 48% 14 TN
26952 Alliance 12-Reg black 1443 5-5 50% 12 TN
26953 KLUB 18-1 1443 3-4 43% 18 NV
26954 Big Sky 16-Eastside 1443 8-13 31% 16 MT
26955 RoVo Juniors 16 1443 16-14 53% 16 VA
26956 Northern Virginia Volleyball Association (NVVA) 16 16 XP-Green 1443 14-18 44% 16 VA
26957 PEVC 13-Sam 1443 15-16 48% 13 SC
26958 928 Impact 12 1443 13-8 62% 12 AZ
26959 GP 15 Elite 1443 50-36 58% 15 FL
26960 Gulf Coast Juniors Volleyball 15 15 Storm 1443 18-19 49% 15 FL
26961 Infinity 14-National 1443 29-26 53% 14 CO
26962 MN Attack 14-Purple 1443 2-7 22% 14 MN
26963 CT Juniors 13-National 1443 14-21 40% 13 CT
26964 Big Cat 13-Purple 1443 4-5 40% 13 IA
26965 QC Lancer Force 15-G 1443 0-2 0% 15 IA
26966 Blues 14-1 gold 1443 14-24 37% 14 OR
26967 Laurel Express 18-1 1443 14-17 41% 18 MT
26968 Texas Storm 11 Teal 1443 5-11 24% 11 TX
26969 AVBC 16-Red 1443 10-10 50% 16 MI
26970 Stanly Extreme 14 Stephen 1443 2-3 40% 14 NC
26971 United VBA 13-White 1443 12-14 46% 13 TX
26972 CADO 15-1 kismet 1443 15-27 32% 15 NY
26973 Sierra Club 17-Pink 1443 9-10 47% 17 CO
26974 LevelUp 14-Juniors 1443 2-3 33% 14 MI
26975 Va Wave 12-Rogue 1443 7-9 44% 12 VA
26976 Inside Out 15-Mizunopurple 1443 18-24 43% 15 MI
26977 Chisago Lakes 13-2 green 1443 1-3 25% 13 MN
26978 Unified 11-2 1443 16-16 50% 11 MI
26979 Eagan Juniors 12-S 1443 3-6 33% 12 MN
26980 ERAA 13-1 1443 17-20 46% 13 MN
26981 Rosemount Irish 12-2 1443 8-11 40% 12 MN
26982 Starlings Tucson 13-Red 1443 16-20 44% 13 AZ
26983 Crush 16-1 1443 5-6 42% 16 PA
26984 Wildcats 12-1 1443 3-6 33% 12 MN
26985 Banzai VBC 16-Performance 1443 0-2 0% 16 NE
26986 London Elite 11-Blue 1443 2-2 50% 11 OH
26987 Kalamazoo Force 15 Kalamazoo Force 1443 2-3 40% 15 MI
26988 CLUB STEEL 12-Zoi 1443 12-8 60% 12 FL
26989 CHAVC 12-Purple 1443 2-2 50% 12 NC
26990 Iowa Select Evolution 13-Elite 1443 1-4 20% 13 IA
26991 Volleyball Hitters 13 1443 1-3 25% 13 NJ
26992 Kaizen Girls 14-Black 1443 16-25 39% 14 OK
26993 Notorious VBC 15 Notorious HIT 1443 14-17 45% 15 LA
26994 NecTr 16-Jailyn 1443 28-27 51% 16 NV
26995 LAVA South 12-Premier 1443 31-39 44% 12 CA
26996 FVA 12-Ember - a1 1443 5-7 38% 12 AK
26997 Htown 14 1443 2-2 50% 14 IN
26998 Own It 16-S bays 1443 10-9 53% 16 KY
26999 Viper 12-Audrey 1443 7-5 58% 12 CA
27000 CVC 12-Regional 1443 17-15 53% 12 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.