2025-2026 Season — Page 543 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27101 | MOD Regional 12-Pink | 1442 | 6-5 | 55% | 12 | IL |
| 27102 | LevelUp 13-Juniors | 1442 | 0-1 | 0% | 13 | MI |
| 27103 | Philly Starlings 18 | 1442 | 4-5 | 44% | 18 | PA |
| 27104 | Centennial Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1442 | 13-19 | 41% | 13 | MN |
| 27105 | Krush VBC 12-Elite | 1442 | 12-20 | 38% | 12 | MI |
| 27106 | Impact Volleyball 14 10 | 1442 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | NV |
| 27107 | Dynamite 12-Premier | 1442 | 17-19 | 47% | 12 | MI |
| 27108 | Eclipse 14-S purple | 1442 | 12-14 | 46% | 14 | WY |
| 27109 | AVC 13-David | 1442 | 15-18 | 39% | 13 | TX |
| 27110 | NW Illini 10-Gray | 1442 | 0-2 | 0% | 10 | IL |
| 27111 | TAV South 15-White | 1442 | 21-20 | 48% | 15 | TX |
| 27112 | 3CE 13-Reign | 1442 | 16-26 | 34% | 13 | TX |
| 27113 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-5 | 1442 | 2-4 | 33% | 13 | KS |
| 27114 | Crank It 16-Black | 1442 | 22-24 | 48% | 16 | MI |
| 27115 | E2 15-Emerald | 1442 | 15-16 | 48% | 15 | KY |
| 27116 | Lex United 15-Black | 1442 | 32-27 | 54% | 15 | KY |
| 27117 | CSF 13-Black | 1442 | 10-12 | 45% | 13 | NC |
| 27118 | MN CORE 12-2 | 1442 | 7-8 | 47% | 12 | MN |
| 27119 | Max Performance 17-Kayla | 1442 | 25-21 | 52% | 17 | MA |
| 27120 | North AL 16 | 1442 | 5-7 | 38% | 16 | AL |
| 27121 | Surge 15-S | 1442 | 1-3 | 25% | 15 | LA |
| 27122 | NK 14-Onyx | 1442 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | ND |
| 27123 | NOALL 14-Black | 1442 | 5-6 | 38% | 14 | ND |
| 27124 | Morgan Hill 15-Black | 1442 | 29-28 | 51% | 15 | CA |
| 27125 | Crush 15-S black | 1442 | 19-20 | 49% | 15 | CA |
| 27126 | Lineshot 12-Purple american plus | 1442 | 6-9 | 40% | 12 | OH |
| 27127 | Club West 16-Rage | 1442 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | NE |
| 27128 | Exile Black 16 | 1441 | 1-2 | 25% | 16 | IA |
| 27129 | Aces 10 11 | 1441 | 4-6 | 36% | 11 | MT |
| 27130 | Five-Four-Zero Volleyball Academy 18 18 Victory | 1441 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | VA |
| 27131 | Reign 14-Blue | 1441 | 18-15 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 27132 | FL HYPE 14-Blue | 1441 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | FL |
| 27133 | Sharks VC 12 | 1441 | 17-20 | 46% | 12 | GA |
| 27134 | JJVA Club 14-I | 1441 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | FL |
| 27135 | Club Fire 13-Green | 1441 | 2-4 | 20% | 13 | MN |
| 27136 | SCBandits 13-3 white | 1441 | 3-3 | 50% | 13 | ON |
| 27137 | Cape Coast 12-Cosmo | 1441 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | FL |
| 27138 | District 12 12 PEANUTS LOCAL | 1441 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | FL |
| 27139 | FWFIRE 12-B | 1441 | 12-17 | 35% | 12 | TX |
| 27140 | Junior Mints 12-White | 1441 | 4-5 | 31% | 12 | TX |
| 27141 | JM 12-White | 1441 | 0-2 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 27142 | A-E Edge 10-Blue | 1441 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | MN |
| 27143 | NHVB 13-2 | 1441 | 5-7 | 42% | 13 | MN |
| 27144 | MVP 13-National | 1441 | 16-18 | 44% | 13 | TX |
| 27145 | SF Elite 13-Premier | 1441 | 15-20 | 43% | 13 | CA |
| 27146 | FAV 13 Maverick | 1441 | 4-11 | 27% | 13 | CA |
| 27147 | Latitude 41 Volleyball Club 15 15 Elite (OV) (15) | 1441 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | OH |
| 27148 | #951 Elite 13-1 | 1441 | 13-20 | 39% | 13 | CA |
| 27149 | Maverick 15-Maroon | 1441 | 16-35 | 31% | 15 | OH |
| 27150 | LAVA East 13 Premier | 1441 | 15-19 | 44% | 13 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.