Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 543 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
27101 MOD Regional 12-Pink 1442 6-5 55% 12 IL
27102 LevelUp 13-Juniors 1442 0-1 0% 13 MI
27103 Philly Starlings 18 1442 4-5 44% 18 PA
27104 Centennial Volleyball Club 13-1 1442 13-19 41% 13 MN
27105 Krush VBC 12-Elite 1442 12-20 38% 12 MI
27106 Impact Volleyball 14 10 1442 1-3 25% 10 NV
27107 Dynamite 12-Premier 1442 17-19 47% 12 MI
27108 Eclipse 14-S purple 1442 12-14 46% 14 WY
27109 AVC 13-David 1442 15-18 39% 13 TX
27110 NW Illini 10-Gray 1442 0-2 0% 10 IL
27111 TAV South 15-White 1442 21-20 48% 15 TX
27112 3CE 13-Reign 1442 16-26 34% 13 TX
27113 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 13-5 1442 2-4 33% 13 KS
27114 Crank It 16-Black 1442 22-24 48% 16 MI
27115 E2 15-Emerald 1442 15-16 48% 15 KY
27116 Lex United 15-Black 1442 32-27 54% 15 KY
27117 CSF 13-Black 1442 10-12 45% 13 NC
27118 MN CORE 12-2 1442 7-8 47% 12 MN
27119 Max Performance 17-Kayla 1442 25-21 52% 17 MA
27120 North AL 16 1442 5-7 38% 16 AL
27121 Surge 15-S 1442 1-3 25% 15 LA
27122 NK 14-Onyx 1442 1-2 33% 14 ND
27123 NOALL 14-Black 1442 5-6 38% 14 ND
27124 Morgan Hill 15-Black 1442 29-28 51% 15 CA
27125 Crush 15-S black 1442 19-20 49% 15 CA
27126 Lineshot 12-Purple american plus 1442 6-9 40% 12 OH
27127 Club West 16-Rage 1442 3-4 43% 16 NE
27128 Exile Black 16 1441 1-2 25% 16 IA
27129 Aces 10 11 1441 4-6 36% 11 MT
27130 Five-Four-Zero Volleyball Academy 18 18 Victory 1441 3-5 38% 18 VA
27131 Reign 14-Blue 1441 18-15 55% 14 FL
27132 FL HYPE 14-Blue 1441 1-3 25% 14 FL
27133 Sharks VC 12 1441 17-20 46% 12 GA
27134 JJVA Club 14-I 1441 7-8 47% 14 FL
27135 Club Fire 13-Green 1441 2-4 20% 13 MN
27136 SCBandits 13-3 white 1441 3-3 50% 13 ON
27137 Cape Coast 12-Cosmo 1441 1-2 33% 12 FL
27138 District 12 12 PEANUTS LOCAL 1441 1-2 33% 12 FL
27139 FWFIRE 12-B 1441 12-17 35% 12 TX
27140 Junior Mints 12-White 1441 4-5 31% 12 TX
27141 JM 12-White 1441 0-2 0% 12 TX
27142 A-E Edge 10-Blue 1441 1-3 25% 10 MN
27143 NHVB 13-2 1441 5-7 42% 13 MN
27144 MVP 13-National 1441 16-18 44% 13 TX
27145 SF Elite 13-Premier 1441 15-20 43% 13 CA
27146 FAV 13 Maverick 1441 4-11 27% 13 CA
27147 Latitude 41 Volleyball Club 15 15 Elite (OV) (15) 1441 1-4 20% 15 OH
27148 #951 Elite 13-1 1441 13-20 39% 13 CA
27149 Maverick 15-Maroon 1441 16-35 31% 15 OH
27150 LAVA East 13 Premier 1441 15-19 44% 13 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.