2025-2026 Season — Page 535 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26701 | Rockwood 10-Yellow | 1446 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | MO |
| 26702 | CCV 14-The rebellion | 1446 | 15-15 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 26703 | 865VB 16-Blue | 1446 | 19-15 | 56% | 16 | TN |
| 26704 | Ohana Storm 14-Alyssa | 1446 | 15-15 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 26705 | SPVC 14-Jacquie | 1446 | 10-10 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 26706 | Pursuit 14-1 | 1446 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 26707 | Forza 14-Power | 1446 | 32-36 | 47% | 14 | IL |
| 26708 | RDEVA 16-Alex | 1446 | 23-30 | 43% | 16 | CO |
| 26709 | HVVC 16-2 | 1446 | 16-13 | 53% | 16 | OR |
| 26710 | Crushers 16-Black | 1446 | 27-28 | 49% | 16 | OR |
| 26711 | Academy Skyline 14-1 | 1446 | 10-10 | 48% | 14 | TX |
| 26712 | De Pere Diggers 12-S | 1446 | 7-10 | 41% | 12 | WI |
| 26713 | MT NW 18-Lacy | 1446 | 9-16 | 31% | 18 | MT |
| 26714 | DYNASTY 14-Black (GL) | 1446 | 9-13 | 41% | 14 | TX |
| 26715 | LBK 17-2 | 1446 | 9-10 | 47% | 17 | OH |
| 26716 | FSVC 18-Elite | 1446 | 28-31 | 47% | 18 | FL |
| 26717 | Courthouse 16-Red | 1445 | 16-17 | 47% | 16 | OR |
| 26718 | Troy 14-Black | 1445 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | |
| 26719 | Cleveland Wave Volleyball Club 16 CWAVE McHugh | 1445 | 19-19 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 26720 | FC Elite North 16-S | 1445 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | WI |
| 26721 | Katy United 12-Molten | 1445 | 16-21 | 43% | 12 | TX |
| 26722 | C-Force VBC 18-Black | 1445 | 20-18 | 53% | 18 | TN |
| 26723 | Athlete HQ 17-Martin | 1445 | 19-22 | 46% | 17 | OH |
| 26724 | Champion 12-R black | 1445 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | NC |
| 26725 | Surfside 16-Pv fabi | 1445 | 12-15 | 44% | 16 | CA |
| 26726 | Amarillo Xtreme 12 Sharks | 1445 | 16-15 | 52% | 12 | TX |
| 26727 | Evolution 17-Red | 1445 | 1-3 | 14% | 17 | IA |
| 26728 | Precision One 14-Instate green | 1445 | 1-2 | 25% | 14 | IA |
| 26729 | TX Ridgebacks 15-Red | 1445 | 21-19 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 26730 | Conquest 17-Rey | 1445 | 8-16 | 30% | 17 | NJ |
| 26731 | HDVC 13-Brittany | 1445 | 5-6 | 45% | 13 | TN |
| 26732 | Empire Volleyball Club 13 U14 Empire White (NO) | 1445 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | |
| 26733 | OKC Ignite 18-1 | 1445 | 8-9 | 44% | 18 | OK |
| 26734 | RAGE 16-Riley | 1445 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | CA |
| 26735 | CITY 13-1 | 1445 | 8-10 | 38% | 13 | NY |
| 26736 | New Wave 14-S dannee | 1445 | 16-20 | 44% | 14 | CA |
| 26737 | Tribe 14-Harington | 1445 | 6-8 | 43% | 14 | OH |
| 26738 | 208 U18-Blue | 1445 | 16-10 | 62% | 18 | ID |
| 26739 | CVC 11 SILVER | 1445 | 12-24 | 33% | 11 | OH |
| 26740 | Renaissance 17-Red | 1445 | 18-27 | 40% | 17 | OH |
| 26741 | Black Canyon Volleyball Club 13 Black Canyon Shane | 1445 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | CO |
| 26742 | Elkhart 10-Gold | 1445 | 1-2 | 33% | 10 | IN |
| 26743 | Maine Juniors Volleyball Club 17-Gold | 1445 | 5-4 | 56% | 17 | MA |
| 26744 | Lakas 14-Power | 1445 | 23-21 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 26745 | MVP Club 17-1 | 1445 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | WI |
| 26746 | OK Premier 14-1 jerry | 1445 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | OK |
| 26747 | NW Jrs 15-Blue | 1445 | 26-33 | 44% | 15 | WA |
| 26748 | ATTACK 18 | 1445 | 1-2 | 33% | 18 | ND |
| 26749 | Controlled Chaos 15 Controlled Chaos Green (KE) (15) | 1445 | 1-4 | 20% | 15 | PA |
| 26750 | Alpha Omega Volleyball 18-1 | 1445 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.